Houston Rockets to court high school crush today after meeting with ex on Tuesday

Just a few years removed from seeing him turn his nose up at their overtures, the Houston Rockets today will finally have their date with Carmelo Anthony.  They’ll get to make their pitch on their home-court and show him their newly renovated facilities.  Anthony then will get on a plane and head to Dallas where Mark Cuban will do much of the same, except with a presumptuous look on his face.  There won’t be any late-night dinner and soaking in of the Houston skyline (?) as there was last night in Chicago.  But still, Houston will get the shot they hadn’t gotten before.  They’re thin now and their acne has cleared up.  They now hope to project that newfound confidence upon Anthony with Dwight Howard in the room.

There are those who believe that the timing of these meetings holds no significance, that it is merely a coincidence of geography.  I tend to disagree.  It means nothing that he visited Chicago first, with its proximity to New York.  But that Anthony spent the entire day with the Bulls while only apportioning half-day meetings with the Rockets and Mavericks should give reason for pause.  His heart is in Chicago: the glitz and glamour the big city has to offer, the same stuff to which he’s become accustomed over the past few years.  The duration of these meetings should not be seen as insignificant.  If all else were equal, I think Anthony would already be a Bull.

But all else isn’t equal as signing Anthony would require some cap gymnastics.  It appears that even after trading highly valuable swingman Jimmy Butler, the Bulls could only offer Anthony a contract starting at around $17million.  Giving Anthony something closer to his actual max would require the Knicks taking back Carlos Boozer in a sign&trade, something they, at the moment, appear unwilling to do.

Houston, on the other hand, from most indications, can free up close to $20million after unloading the contracts of Jeremy Lin, Donatas Motiejunas, and Isaiah Canaan.  This ontop of the tax savings makes Houston the more preferable destination, financially.

This whole decision could be in Phil Jackson’s hands.  We’ve beaten the merits of each destination firmly into the ground.  Would Phil budge on taking back Boozer if Mirotic is included?  Keeping Boozer altogether would put the Knicks in luxury tax hell, but they could look to trade him as an expiring later in the year.  I don’t think ‘Melo can use the bluff of signing with Houston outright to bait Phil into a sign&trade: letting Anthony walk is preferable to taking Boozer.  But what if Houston offers its own sign&trade package?  Would a package featuring Jeremy Lin and the Pelicans pick convince Jackson to lend a hand?  If Carmelo Anthony wants his money, this thing very well could come down to what package Phil Jackson is willing to take.

In any event, Houston will have its meeting with Anthony later today.  It will go well and the Rockets will come out confident because that is how everyone in the history of meetings has described themselves to the media afterward.

-The other news yesterday was that Houston tried to smooth things over with former point guard Kyle Lowry.  The team reportedly made an offer, which Lowry is mulling over, also approaching Toronto with a sign&trade.  The whole scenario leads one to wonder what the hell is going on or whether some of these reports are inaccurate.  Had Lowry committed to signing with the Rockets into their cap space, the Anthony dream would be over; had Lowry been acquired for Lin, the Anthony dream would be over; had Lowry been swapped for Chandler Parsons, well, this whole thing would be really awkward…Houston reportedly plans to make its pitch today to Anthony with Parsons’ presence on the roster as a part of the presentation.

You can bet money that Daryl Morey has drawn up several contingency plans upon which to act in the event of any number of preceding events.  He’s been playing chess for some years now: he’s not exactly going to get caught with his pants down if striking out on Anthony and say, “f*** it, I’ll offer Jordan Hill 5 years at $50million.”  The guy that would have done that is now enjoying a senior consulting role within the organization, very, very safely away from these decisions, please rest assured.  My hunch is that the media has simply caught wind of various fragments of conversations, from different parties, and the result, manifested in these reports, is a scattered plan.  Houston may very well strike out, and the odds lean in that favor.  But they won’t panic and any move made will be rational.

-A final note, on Marcin Gortat, who just extracted $60million at 5 years.  I think Omer Asik will command a higher annual figure.  But more strangely, lately, I’ve been personalizing these contracts to a degree at which I never had before.  Can you imagine the feeling of signing a contract that will guarantee you receive $60million?  I simply can’t.

There will certainly be news today.  Follow me on Twitter if you haven’t.  I’ll rant about something.

View this discussion from the forum.

This entry was posted in essays. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
Login to leave a comment.
Total comments: 19
  • txtdo1411 says 1 month ago

    The proof is in the pudding here, look at the coaching tree of Pop, look at the gm tree of Buford, look at all the players that revived their career playing under Pop. I don't think it's an accident Spurs had evolved over time, from a Duncan centric team to Parker/Manu, and Leonard next. Duncan is individually greatest PF of all time, sure, but Parker/Manu/Leonard weren't sure things at all. Compare where they were drafted to where Morey drafted his players you'd get a clear understanding of the pros/cons of the asset collection management style vs player/staff development management style.

    I disagree with what you said about getting players to believe in your cause because the team sees them as an asset. Every player in the league should have one main goal which is to win, and if that isn't your main objective, then like Dwight said "we don't want you here".

    As far as comparing where Manu and Parker were drafted note that they were drafted in a different eariler time. The Spurs were one of the first teams to really explore the European market. There wasn't as much exposure and hype as there is now. It was a brilliant strategy by them, but I do believe with the access to information we have nowadays, it is going to be harder to find those European "gems" in the late 1st/2nd rd. As far as Leonard goes, there were plenty of teams to pass on him, and if they expect to pass the torch from Duncan (greatest PF of all time) to him, I think they are going to be extremely disappointed. He is a really good role player and defender, but he is not a generational great like Duncan.

  • qwer says 1 month ago

    I find myself more and more wanting to create an equivalent for the LOF tag, but in reference to the Spurs' Lovers. It's getting out of hand.

    They are mortal. Even with one of the greatest players of all time, one of the greatest coaches of all time, and top flight players at key positions throughout the past 15 years they have lost 10 times. Does anyone actually believe that once Duncan retires (or finally takes that last step to being this generation's Robert Parrish), Parker loses a step, and Manu's legs finally fall off that they will be the same?

    Perhaps "Spur-rockets" would work...."Sprockets"? You could make your posts like this: complain about the Rockets, wonder why we can't be more like the Spurs, and then conclude every post with, "And now we dance!"

    sprockets-o.gif

    :lol:

    So let's just look at the organization point of view. Morey is following the Heats model, where you get 3 top 20 players and fill out the roster. Essentially, due to CBA's current limit of "superstar" contract value, that is the best allocation of salary cap. Thus, Morey talks about "assets" he want to gather in order to get to that 3 superstars.

    Let's just think about this for a moment, unless you're one of the top 3 players the team identified as superstars, you're not a person/player, you're just an asset. I'm sure Morey is smarter than all of us, but generally speaking, you won't get people to believe in your cause if you treat them like a stepping stone. There are plenty of management theories that speak to the advantage of believing in your underlings with an eye of helping them to achieve their future.

    The proof is in the pudding here, look at the coaching tree of Pop, look at the gm tree of Buford, look at all the players that revived their career playing under Pop. I don't think it's an accident Spurs had evolved over time, from a Duncan centric team to Parker/Manu, and Leonard next. Duncan is individually greatest PF of all time, sure, but Parker/Manu/Leonard weren't sure things at all. Compare where they were drafted to where Morey drafted his players you'd get a clear understanding of the pros/cons of the asset collection management style vs player/staff development management style.

  • majik19 says 1 month ago

    The other thing about the Spurs is they tuned their team and systemto beat the Heat. Remember how they struggled against Dallas? Don't get me wrong - it's a beautiful, well polished machine and they could absolutely win again next year. But the Rockets would have the talent to compete against them (we just have to shore up the bench - and I mean the coaching bench).

  • Cooper says 1 month ago

    Really if ibaka doesn't get hurt or the okc owners aren't too cheap to pick up someone so that derek fisher isn't playing big minutes in the playoffs the spurs likely don't make the finals. They're really good but not the only quality team/organization out there not everyone has to emulate everything they do.

  • thejohnnygold says 1 month ago

    I find myself more and more wanting to create an equivalent for the LOF tag, but in reference to the Spurs' Lovers. It's getting out of hand.

    They are mortal. Even with one of the greatest players of all time, one of the greatest coaches of all time, and top flight players at key positions throughout the past 15 years they have lost 10 times. Does anyone actually believe that once Duncan retires (or finally takes that last step to being this generation's Robert Parrish), Parker loses a step, and Manu's legs finally fall off that they will be the same?

    Perhaps "Spur-rockets" would work...."Sprockets"? You could make your posts like this: complain about the Rockets, wonder why we can't be more like the Spurs, and then conclude every post with, "And now we dance!"

    sprockets-o.gif

    :lol:

  • qwer says 1 month ago

    I'm not discounting the Spurs' system, which definitely helps, but Morey will be able to find guys like these (maybe he already has in some of our draft picks this year).

    There is no question Morey can find cheap alternative guys that fit his "system". There are two follow up question here. First, can Rockets' system beat Spurs' system? Second, Pop seem to have the ability to develop players within the Spurs system. Does McHale have that capability?

  • timetodienow1234567 says 1 month ago Lol. Nice Finding Nemo reference.
  • thejohnnygold says 1 month ago

    The retention rate around here is atrocious. So many things have been addressed time and again; yet, here we are asking the same questions and making the same incorrect assumptions. :blink:

    Dory.gif

  • majik19 says 1 month ago

    I'm pretty sure Rahat already addressed that, but I'll reiterate: Morey has consistently been able to unearth cheap role players (via 2nd round picks, castoffs, etc.) Stars have only come through trades and free agency.

    Morey will be able to build up the supporting cast once the stars are set. Even if we strike out this summer and end up paying Parsons 10 mil/yr, we'll still have room on the edges to upgrade.

    Remember that many of the Spurs' rotation players were late draft picks and castoffs - that is where Morey specializes. Examples from the Spurs:

    Boris Diaw - castoff as a fat has been by Charlotte, starred for SA in the finals.

    Patty Mills - made near the minimum last year, minimal interest until SA signed him

    Danny Green - was nearly out of the league until the Spurs revived his career

    Marco Belinelli - signed for less than 3 mil/year last year in free agency.

    I'm not discounting the Spurs' system, which definitely helps, but Morey will be able to find guys like these (maybe he already has in some of our draft picks this year).

  • Cooper says 1 month ago

    Trading one player to be able to sign one better player makes us less deep?

  • bladad says 1 month ago

    Trading away a key part of the bench to land a superstar. Hmmm. Didn't the Spurs prove that having a great bench is necessary to get through the hyper competitive Western Conference?

  • Steven says 1 month ago

    I'm going to guess a chunk of that 40.1million dollar profit Houston Rockets generated this past season was from Lin's appeal in China.(That profit ranked #3 in the league behind Lakers 100mil and Bulls 61 mil, figures from Zack Lowe's article on grantland). This is, after all, a business for Les Alexander. My guess is, Lin alone generated more cash for the Rockets than any other individual players. Another part of reason why he's not traded yet, along with D-Mo and Canaan's salary to get to that 20mil range of max offer.

    Ummm, jersey sales in other countries are split evenly amongst the 30 teams, just like all merchandise sales in the US, excluding in arena and team stores sales.
  • uojoe82 says 1 month ago

    I think that the Rockets should trade Lin as soon as they have a deal lined up. Waiting to see what Melo does is risky. If you're a GM of another team and you know the Rockets have to trade Lin to get Melo than you have ALL the leverage in the world. You could ask for multiple picks. T Jones or D MO, basically you could ask for the world because the Rockets would have no choice.

    If the Rockets strike out on Melo they could easily use the stretch provision to free up cap space to sign a Lowry, Ariza, Deng, and eventually Parsons. The stretch provision could stretch Lins cap hit to three seasons (years left times 2 plus an additional year). So instead of Lin's cap hit being $8.5 million next year it would be around $2.84 for the next three years. And now you don't have to give up assets to get rid of Lin's contract.

    A couple other thoughts:

    - I think Melo signs with the Bulls (if he does leave NY). The competition of the west compared to the competition of the east is night and day. Even without a healthy D Rose I think the Bulls (substitute Melo for Boozer) are easily a top 3 team in the east next year. Add a healthy Rose to the equation and Eastern Conference finals should be a lock. The west is so competitive that teams with championship aspirations go out in the first round.

    -What happens if some team offers Parson's the max (either to be a [PLEASE STOP USING PROFANITY PEOPLE!!!> to the Rockets or because they have cap space)? If the Rockets match they lose all flexibility in upcoming years and if they arent able to get a third star this year Parson's now has to become the third leg of the big three tripod based on salary alone. I think this is a realistic scenario if the Rockets plan to match at all costs.

  • Buckko says 1 month ago

    I'm going to guess a chunk of that 40.1million dollar profit Houston Rockets generated this past season was from Lin's appeal in China.(That profit ranked #3 in the league behind Lakers 100mil and Bulls 61 mil, figures from Zack Lowe's article on grantland). This is, after all, a business for Les Alexander. My guess is, Lin alone generated more cash for the Rockets than any other individual players. Another part of reason why he's not traded yet, along with D-Mo and Canaan's salary to get to that 20mil range of max offer.

    Rockets are the trademark franchise in china with or without lin.

  • slick shoes says 1 month ago

    If Toronto loses Lowry (a good chance) they could also become a viable option.

    Another great fit for Lin IMO. Should we attempt to sign Nelson to the vet minumum to bring in for leadership or does his past relationship with DH12 keep anything like that from happening?

  • qwer says 1 month ago

    I'm going to guess a chunk of that 40.1million dollar profit Houston Rockets generated this past season was from Lin's appeal in China.(That profit ranked #3 in the league behind Lakers 100mil and Bulls 61 mil, figures from Zack Lowe's article on grantland). This is, after all, a business for Les Alexander. My guess is, Lin alone generated more cash for the Rockets than any other individual players. Another part of reason why he's not traded yet, along with D-Mo and Canaan's salary to get to that 20mil range of max offer.

  • thejohnnygold says 1 month ago

    Some reports saying Rockets has deals lined up for Lin trade. I wonder it was just a smoke screen Morey blew with his cigar.

    Why didn't he pull the trigger if they really have a deal? Even if it was true that others have interests, why in the wold do they think other team will wait and wait for Lin's deal. Every Lin related stories are unbelievable.

    Consider, if you will, that each deal may be part of a bigger plan. Perhaps there are some three-team deals and, depending on which free agent we are going after, the other team prefers certain assets to others which we can gain from said Lin trades. It's not solely about getting the money off our books.

    (a gentle reminder for all: please don't spam the boards. Nobody wants to read the same post in multiple threads. Say your bit and move on)

    Since Lin is the topic (for some reason) the recent signings of players like Meeks and Bradley help us because now Lin's $8.3M cap hit doesn't look so bad. Compared to what Stephenson is about to get he'll be a bargain.

    Sacramento may be back in consideration if they can't hang onto Thomas. A Lin-Cousins pick n roll with Gay/McLemore/Landry around them could do some damage. It would put them in the tax, but only for one season. Ranadive probably won't mind the expense if it makes his team more appealing to free agents.

    If Toronto loses Lowry (a good chance) they could also become a viable option. The Magic are still in play as well.

  • Buckko says 1 month ago

    Because they will obviously have to dump assets to get rid of lin, and they wouldn't want to waste assets without a guarantee from a FA as they could just lin expire in 2015 for nothing. Unlike asik where they gained assets.

  • dbd says 1 month ago

    Some reports saying Rockets has deals lined up for Lin trade. I wonder it was just a smoke screen Morey blew with his cigar.

    Why didn't he pull the trigger if they really have a deal? Even if it was true that others have interests, why in the wold do they think other team will wait and wait for Lin's deal. Every Lin related stories are unbelievable.