A reader writes:
I like this roster. I like this team. I would prefer we keep it as is unless some team puts a stud PG/PF on a fire sale and gives them away for, essentially, nothing. There has been lots of concern over our depth (somewhat unwarranted)–what would we have left if we trade it for an upgrade to a starter? Capela and NJ? Yikes!
I think if a trade happens this season it will be minor and will likely be to reinforce the bench.
Of course, one never wants to rush to trade, just to trade. And it is still very early. But at least initially, I would have to strongly, strongly disagree for two primary reasons:
- The league is more wide open this season than I can remember in some time, and we don’t know when such a window will again present itself. Injuries to Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook will bury the Thunder to a bottom seed. The Pacers don’t figure to be a factor. Derrick Rose is still rounding into form, and it will take the Cavs some time to gel. At least one of these situations will not be the case next season. Now one could easily argue that there are unique circumstances every year. Sure. But I don’t quite remember a time when so many heavyweights were crippled. And Houston always has matched up well with the Spurs.
- The Pelicans pick: You have to trade it this season. I don’t think bringing in a rookie next season onto a team with title aspirations represents very good return. You could point to Big Papa as a counter-argument, but I’d mention that he’s a seasoned veteran from his play overseas.
You never want to tinker with a winning formula. But I also would not want to enter the postseason feeling like I did not load up on all the ammunition I could get my hands on.
View this discussion from the forum.
