Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox 
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General NBA Free Agency Discussion Thread
#41
Guest_RedStewie_*
Posted 01 July 2012 - 11:36 PM
McGee and Hibbert- especially Hibbert has produced as starters. McGee has a higher ceiling both offensively and defensively than Asik and Hibbert, if he can get it together
#42
Posted 01 July 2012 - 11:46 PM
#43
Posted 01 July 2012 - 11:52 PM
Probably something like $5mil,$5.2mil and either $14.5mil and a signing bonus @ $400-500,000 or the last yr is assumed to be @ $14.9mil w/a higher Cap at that point.
Interesting they only went 3 yrs.
#44
Posted 01 July 2012 - 11:59 PM
And if they can still pull off a Dwight trade,for first couple of seasons he's at just $5mil a yr,reasonable for a decent back-up C. They'll worry about that third yr later.(And even a Gasol trade still works as Gasol is just signed for two yrs,the yrs Asik gets $5mil. Altho I think the Gasol ship has sailed for Rockets.)
#45
Posted 02 July 2012 - 12:00 AM
#46
Posted 02 July 2012 - 12:04 AM
Asik is not proven, he doesn't play starter minutes even when Noah was hurt.
McGee and Hibbert- especially Hibbert has produced as starters. McGee has a higher ceiling both offensively and defensively than Asik and Hibbert, if he can get it together
McGee will never be as good of an offensive player as Hibbert. His ceiling, in my opinion is Tyson Chandler. We have no shot at Hibbert. Asik is one of the top post defenders in the league right now. McGee has value as an off the ball defender, but Asik can also guard on the ball. Offensive stats on the Nuggets are kind of like offensive stats on the old Warriors. They get so many possessions of course he is going to score. He runs the floor well, but his offensive game is limited as well.
Interestingly, in the Asik deal, by the time he would cost a lot of money he is an expiring contract. If he's not producing he may have value as a guy to save money for the future, a la Martin.
#47
Posted 02 July 2012 - 12:06 AM
Feigen corrected to 3 yrs,w/third yr @ $15mil.
Probably something like $5mil,$5.2mil and either $14.5mil and a signing bonus @ $400-500,000 or the last yr is assumed to be @ $14.9mil w/a higher Cap at that point.
Interesting they only went 3 yrs.
I think Morey probably preferred to put all of the backloading into one year because it means if Asik doesn't work out he's only crippling the cap situation for one season. It's also a smart move because it puts Chicago in a situation where they can't really say yes because of the amount they're going to be paying Rose and Boozer in that year.
ST
#48
Guest_RedStewie_*
Posted 02 July 2012 - 12:32 AM
Or they could do what Orlando did with Gortat, match the salary, retain him, then trade him during the season before luxury tax hits
#49
Posted 02 July 2012 - 12:33 AM
#50
Posted 02 July 2012 - 12:33 AM
He does actually get paid 5/5/14, so if he was traded in the third year of his contract, he would be expiring at $14m. Very nice to have a trade chip like that and not actually have all $14M against the cap
ST
#51
Posted 02 July 2012 - 12:35 AM
To match his salary, Chicago does not have to match the contract type. For example, all they need to do is match the overall money over the same time period- while we might offer more money the last year, they can spread it all.
Or they could do what Orlando did with Gortat, match the salary, retain him, then trade him during the season before luxury tax hits
Nope, Chicago is over the cap so they are limited to the MLE. They are unable to offer him more than $5M this year, which is why the contract is structured that way.
ST
EDIT: Here's how the Gilbert Arenas provision works: http://www.cbafaq.co...larycap.htm#Q44
#52
Guest_RedStewie_*
Posted 02 July 2012 - 12:39 AM
Match his contract and then trade him later
#53
Posted 02 July 2012 - 12:52 AM
But Chicago can do what Orlando did with Gortat a few years ago instead of losing him to free agency.
Match his contract and then trade him later
That's true. Although they'd have to take back approximately the same amount of salary in any trade deal - even if they're saving themselves 25% they're still on the hook for $10M. Alternatively they could amnesty Boozer at some point down the line. You're right that it's not impossible for Chicago to match, but it does create an irritating problem for them that might be sufficient to convince them to he's not worth it.
One thing this does mean is that if Chicago decides to match his offer sheet, they are not allowed to trade him to Houston for the next year. So it's this gambit or nothing as far as acquiring Asik is concerned.
ST
#54
Guest_RedStewie_*
Posted 02 July 2012 - 12:55 AM
And then you never know, there is always a team willing to trade for an expiring contract.
I'm just hoping they match because i doubt he's has the caliber to be a starting C.
We have a lot of unproven players as it is on our team, i dont want another one
#55
Posted 02 July 2012 - 01:00 AM
"Will Rocket jerseys sell in Turkey?"
-Alexander
#56
Posted 02 July 2012 - 01:02 AM
#57
Posted 02 July 2012 - 01:06 AM
#58
Posted 02 July 2012 - 01:09 AM
#59
Posted 02 July 2012 - 01:21 AM
#60
Posted 02 July 2012 - 01:23 AM
Heard something funny on Twitter, figured I'd share.
"Rockets and Omer Asik agree to an 8 million a year contract, this could be the worst contract since weight watchers signed Charles Barkley"
HAHAHA!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










