Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  Mario Peña : (23 June 2018 - 02:50 AM) Oh no! What can this CP leak be about?
@  thejohnnygold : (20 June 2018 - 04:44 PM) It's probably LA trying to drive the asking price down ;)
@  Mario Peña : (19 June 2018 - 09:37 PM) I wonder who is leaking the injury concerns regarding Kawhi. That can’t be good for him if they get any traction.
@  thejohnnygold : (16 June 2018 - 04:45 PM) I doubt anyone says no to Kawhi, but reports are he wants to go to LA.
@  rocketrick : (16 June 2018 - 12:07 PM) Kawhi Leonard? Just wondering as this site continues to fade away..........
@  rocketrick : (10 June 2018 - 09:35 AM) Up for Debate. It is OK. The Author has some interesting points in his commentary but this Rockets site is dying because apparently the author is also thin skinned and not willing to open up further discussion.
@  Losthief : (09 June 2018 - 03:37 AM) I think that was a forbes article...i don't know the rules for copy pasting it wholesale...but im guessing not allowed.
@  rocketrick : (07 June 2018 - 11:17 PM) Still don't see the Capela article but I will comment on that if that should ever appear to comment upon. Still, Capela averaging a double/double with a number of highlight reel blocked shots during the series, well, I am still speechless what the author attempted to convey regarding Capela. He certainly didn't cause us to lose to the Warriors by any stretch......
@  thejohnnygold : (06 June 2018 - 03:15 PM) Got ya fixed, Rick. FYI, you can create these posts as well. Just start a new topic and copy+paste the article text.
@  rocketrick : (05 June 2018 - 07:47 PM) Speechless
@  rocketrick : (05 June 2018 - 07:46 PM) Who only averaged a double-double during the 7 game slugfest
@  rocketrick : (05 June 2018 - 07:46 PM) What an author states in an article..... in this case regarding Capela
@  rocketrick : (05 June 2018 - 07:45 PM) Once again I am aghast at the fact I do not have the opportunity on this site to discuss what an article author states.
@  thejohnnygold : (02 June 2018 - 03:58 PM) Got you all set up, Rick. Fire away on Ariza!
@  rocketrick : (01 June 2018 - 01:49 PM) I have some comments and ideas about Rahat's article on Trevor Ariza but unfortunately that is no longer possible directly on this site...Rahat's article on "The Challenges in Playing Trevor Ariza"
@  DenverRocket : (29 May 2018 - 04:26 PM) So disappointed, but I agree, great effort. To even be that close despite losing CP3, experiencing such a massive statistical outlier from 3 and some very questionable officiating calls, is just crazy. I feel bad, my youngest was heartbroken going to bed. I told him we'll be back next year :-)
@  rocketrick : (29 May 2018 - 11:30 AM) IMO, the Rockets are clearly on the right track. Like D'Antoni stated in his presser after Game 7, make a few tweeks and let's go again
@  rocketrick : (29 May 2018 - 11:27 AM) Just guessing, so 80% of the time the home team wins Game 7 in the NBA and 99.99% of the time NBA teams don't go 0/27 on 3 pointers. So combine those odds along with the fact CP3 is injured.........
@  rocketrick : (29 May 2018 - 11:25 AM) Looking forward to seeing Nate Silver's statistical breakdown of the Rockets tragic 3 point shooting on his 538 site later today or tomorrow
@  redfaithful : (29 May 2018 - 07:10 AM) Indeed great season, too bad it ended due to injury. First time in very long time that someone made the Warriors look vulnarable

Photo

Recap: OKC Thunder 120, Houston Rockets 98


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 Red94

Red94

    Senior Member

  • Administrators
  • 1,547 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 04:23 AM

New post: Recap: OKC Thunder 120, Houston Rockets 98
  • 0

#2 Johnny Rocket

Johnny Rocket

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 221 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 05:50 AM

There was little doubt we would lose, but in some ways I was surprised that we had several chances to cut the lead to eight early in the 4th before losing steam. My major worry after this game is that a stronger, more physical team essentially man-handled our backcourt. This seems to be a persistent weakness with the Rockets, especially on the road, though Parson's absence made it worse.
  • 0

#3 Stephen

Stephen

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 359 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 04:31 PM

What the hell has happened to Terrence Jones?
The aggressive dude from Pre-Season and his first couple of games? The one who was going to replace Pat any second?

In his brief 2Q stint he got the ball for a wide open 3,hesitated,dribbled a couple of steps in then made a pass that was easily picked off. Running back on D he seemed to think about going for the block,but stopped and the OKC player made an easy lay-up.
Somewhere Jones has gotten lost and he needs a major rehab to become a rotation player.
But there's some hope,in his second stint he was trailing Durant,stopped and went to cover an outside shooter before Durant made the pass. A nice basketball play.
  • 0

#4 SamC

SamC

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 50 posts
  • LocationConnecticut

Posted 29 November 2012 - 05:21 PM

Let me start off by saying that I'm a Lin fan and I had to listen to the game instead of watching the game because of block out rules with my mobile league pass but from what I could hear, it seems like Lin had a lot less touches in that game. And I see a concerted effort by Lin to take better shots and not force it. Harden is definitely a talented player but when it's not your night, I'd rather have him try to get his teammates going rather than play hero ball.
  • 0

#5 Jeby

Jeby

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 210 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 05:57 PM

As disappointing as it was to see Harden and Lin struggle, I think you have to blame the blowout on Parsons being out. He matched up with Durant really well last year, has been playing like a stud this month, and is worlds better than Replacement Player (aka Dequan Cook).
Not saying the Rockets would have won with Parsons in, but yet would have made it a game.
  • 0

#6 Sir Thursday

Sir Thursday

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,309 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 29 November 2012 - 10:53 PM

As disappointing as it was to see Harden and Lin struggle, I think you have to blame the blowout on Parsons being out. He matched up with Durant really well last year, has been playing like a stud this month, and is worlds better than Replacement Player (aka Dequan Cook).
Not saying the Rockets would have won with Parsons in, but yet would have made it a game.


I agree with this, I think. Parsons being out really disrupts our rotations and there was absolutely nobody else who stood a chance against Durant (Morris was really struggling). If both he and Delfino are out for any stretch of time I would expect us to lose quite a few games.

The Rockets need to figure out a way to deal with these double teams they're throwing at Harden a bit better. It has been shown several times now that if you put a strong primary defender on him (Iguodala, Allen, Sefolosha) and trap him in the pick and roll he will struggle mightily. That's the scouting report on him now and until he or the team figures out how to get around this he's not going to be able to provide the offence we signed him for.

Loving the performance of Patterson and Asik over the past couple of games. They've been really solid and their combined offence has really been driving the team forwards. That was especially the case in this game with the backcourt misfiring. One of the OKC announcers called Asik 'The Big Eclipse' during the game. Not especially clear where that comes from ("MY REVERSE LAYUPS WILL BLOT OUT THE SUN!", maybe?), but it's a pretty awesome one.

Finally, I thought Daequan Cook played pretty well in his first chance to get some burn tonight. He made some threes, showed a vague semblance of a handle, and did the best he could when asked to check Durant (which admittedly, was never going to be enough to make much difference). He made a case for getting a few more minutes in the rotation when Parsons comes back. Dunno that there'll be room for him once Delfino is healthy too though.

ST
  • 1

#7 Cooper

Cooper

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,321 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 03:27 AM

Parsons is really the only guy on the team that can play the 3. With him it would have been closer but the thunder are just overall better and deeper. Harden couldn't do anything driving on thabo with ibaka/Durant/perkins waiting to help.
  • 0

#8 Bigtkirk

Bigtkirk

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 99 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 10:56 PM

Despite Patterson's good game against OKC, my sense is that he is at best a backup PF. Although his offensive skills are improved this season, he appears to be a subpar defender and rebounder. And while his range has increased a bit this season, it is still not good enough to achieve the floor spacing in the half court that Harden and Lin need to maximize efficiency. It's time to start giving some of Patterson's minutes to Motiejunas and Jones and see what they bring to the table.
  • 0

#9 rocketrick

rocketrick

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,894 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 11:26 PM

Despite Patterson's good game against OKC, my sense is that he is at best a backup PF. Although his offensive skills are improved this season, he appears to be a subpar defender and rebounder. And while his range has increased a bit this season, it is still not good enough to achieve the floor spacing in the half court that Harden and Lin need to maximize efficiency. It's time to start giving some of Patterson's minutes to Motiejunas and Jones and see what they bring to the table.


I don't understand people that are dissing Patrick Patterson this season. Last year, I can understand. This season, Patrick Patterson is a much improved player in my humble opinion. He does spread the floor with his much improved 3 point shooting (non-existant last season) and I was at the game the other night and saw him blow by Ed Davis and hammered it home. Is Patrick Patterson a one on one elite defender? Not really, but he knows his role in the team defensive scheme and is simply not a sieve on defense.

BTW, Jones is now back to the D-League so it doesn't look like he'll be replacing Pat anytime soon.

As a Rocket season ticket holder (since 2004-2005 and previously during the championship years), I WANT the Rockets to make it to the playoffs, that is why I buy season tickets!! Starting a rookie just for the sake of starting a rookie isn't gonna happen. IF T Jones or Motie or anyone else can prove they are a better player than Pat in practice and in the precious time they get in games (typically against other 2nd teamers by the way), then yes, that would be the time to consider making the move. As I have mentioned several times already on these boards I just don't see anyone knocking Patterson out of the starting lineup this season.
  • 0

#10 Bigtkirk

Bigtkirk

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 99 posts

Posted 01 December 2012 - 01:20 AM

I don't have the stats, but I suspect that the Rockets have been a more efficient team during the time that Morris has been playing the PF this season rather than Patterson. The point is not that Patterson is a bad player. The point is that over-playing him may not maximize the efficiency of the team. My sense is that spreading some of his minutes to D Mo and Morris may end up increasing the Rockets' efficiency. Not certain, of course. But we pretty much know what we have in Patterson. Not so with Morris and D Mo.
  • 0

#11 Sir Thursday

Sir Thursday

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,309 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 01 December 2012 - 01:52 AM

With Parsons and Delfino out it means Morris has to play more time at the three. That opens up some backup PF minutes for somebody. But whoever we put in a regular rotation spot has to be someone who is actually capable of holding it down. This is a young team where everybody is hungry for minutes, and IMO those minutes should go to the ones who are the most capable at the moment. Key to developing a good team is getting the internal culture right, and IMO meritocracy is the right way to go in that department.

After some promising minutes in his first few games, TJones has gone completely off the boil (he was awful in the last game when he played - hesitant and static), and it definitely makes sense to put him down in the D-League for a while. So perhaps D-Mo might be able to get himself a few spot minutes at the 4? We'll see. Does anyone know the status of Aldrich? He seemed to be in a suit against OKC. If Sampson decides he doesn't want to play D-Mo, then he'll have to either play small ball or slide Greg Smith over to the 4 and play Aldrich as a backup 5. The latter, of course, requires Aldrich to be healthy...

ST
  • 0

#12 RocketMan

RocketMan

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 69 posts
  • LocationSouthern California

Posted 03 December 2012 - 02:41 PM

Does anyone want to talk about how many shots Harden got blocked in this game? Does he just not do a good job protecting the ball or was it just the fact that OKC had his number? I've noticed he has had a good number of his shots blocked compared to other guys on the team. Any comments?
  • 0

#13 Sir Thursday

Sir Thursday

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,309 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 03 December 2012 - 03:03 PM

Does anyone want to talk about how many shots Harden got blocked in this game? Does he just not do a good job protecting the ball or was it just the fact that OKC had his number? I've noticed he has had a good number of his shots blocked compared to other guys on the team. Any comments?


Harden tends to hold the ball out in front of him when he drives for layups to try and draw defenders into slapping at his arms in an attempt to strip the ball. The problem is that, well, sometimes they do manage to strip the ball. Furthermore, the OKC guys will be the most familiar with this tendency and have a good idea about where and when his point of release is going to be, and if you can predict that then the shot becomes a lot easier to block.

But generally I would agree it does feel like we get a lot of shots blocked, certainly more than we manage to repel ourselves. Part of this is that the Rockets do not really have an athletic shot-blocking frontline like a Denver or an OKC, so in comparison our percentage of shot blocked looks worse. The numbers bear this out - we are 25th in the league in blocked shot totals (not a particularly good measurement - I'd prefer to find a Block % stat, but not sure where to find that) and 24th in the league for opposition blocked shots.

Both Lin and Harden drive to the rim a lot, and on nights where they're a bit out of control and the opposition has someone waiting for them in the paint they are going to get rejected a fair bit. But IMO blocked shots are more morale sapping than they are actually damaging on the court - a lot depends on whether you can recover the ball after the block and get another shot in.

ST
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users