Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  slick shoes : (21 June 2017 - 04:28 PM) Morey is locked in for four more years. Glad to have some stability at the helm after everything we've seen the last couple of weeks.
@  slick shoes : (16 June 2017 - 04:31 PM) It's a shame we don't have a first rounder this year. I did notice that the W's and the Cavs have 0 picks this year (not that they need them).
@  thejohnnygold : (16 June 2017 - 03:57 PM) Whoever picks him is going to be a happy camper
@  slick shoes : (16 June 2017 - 02:00 PM) De'Aaron Fox giving Bev a shout at the end of this piece
http://www.espn.com/...var-ball-chorus
@  slick shoes : (22 May 2017 - 05:25 PM) I can't decide if I want them to draft Ball or not.
@  thejohnnygold : (21 May 2017 - 02:50 PM) Don't worry...they'll find a way to screw it up.
@  slick shoes : (17 May 2017 - 03:52 PM) Is anyone else annoyed that the league reached out and helped the Lakers secure a top 3 pick to keep them from long term ruin?
@  Mario Peña : (13 May 2017 - 11:56 AM) It would appear James will take games off next year which is probably a good thing. Perhaps we will see some evolution from emphasis on regular season to being playoff ready both from a physical as well as a strategy standpoint.
@  rocketrick : (12 May 2017 - 05:26 AM) I personally will be rooting for the Spurs in their next matchup with Golden State in the Western Conference Finals
@  rocketrick : (12 May 2017 - 05:26 AM) Congratulations to the Spurs and Coach Pop. They completely destroyed the Rockets last night (understatement of the year)
@  DenverRocket : (12 May 2017 - 02:55 AM) Very disappointing end to an otherwise great season.
@  DenverRocket : (12 May 2017 - 01:10 AM) Stunningly bad. Out played, out coached and no one is stepping up :-(
@  slick shoes : (12 May 2017 - 01:07 AM) Well, it can't get any worse right?
@  slick shoes : (12 May 2017 - 12:35 AM) It's like Dekker has been waiting to play or something.
@  08huangj : (11 May 2017 - 12:08 PM) It is utterly baffling to me why MDA is not utilizing Dekker and Harrell. These two were integral to our dominant regular season bench!
@  DenverRocket : (10 May 2017 - 03:18 AM) Everything the TNT analysts said, I was screaming during OT. MDA blamed it on fatigue - no kidding sherlock, when you only use a 7 player rotation!
@  DenverRocket : (10 May 2017 - 03:17 AM) Sorely disappointed with that. Huge missed opportunity. I thought McHale was coaching again in overtime!
@  slick shoes : (10 May 2017 - 03:02 AM) No offensive scheme in overtime. No Parker, and no Leonard through all of overtime and you STILL can't close it out?!
@  thejohnnygold : (10 May 2017 - 02:57 AM) So much profanity in my home tonight...
@  Mario Peña : (08 May 2017 - 06:57 PM) Right Johnnygold! That was a good game!

Photo

[Woj] Samuel Dalembert traded to Milwaukee


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:31 PM

Adrian Wojnarowski has reported we sent him to Milwaukee as part of a package


Dalembert and the 14th pick go the Bucks for the 12th pick, Jon Brockman, Jon Leurer and Brockman, sources tell Y!

Shaun Livingston also goes to the Rockets as part of the package, sources tell Y!

Edited by Ostrow, 27 June 2012 - 07:36 PM.

  • 0

#2 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:34 PM

I don't know why it posted twice....
  • 0

#3 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,626 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:40 PM

What's livingstons contract look like?
  • 0

#4 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,626 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:45 PM

Heard it also includes brockman and leurer.
  • 0

#5 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:48 PM

Livingston has a team option for 3.5, Brockman is 1mil for next year, Leuer has a TO for 760,000 next year
  • 0

#6 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,626 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:00 PM

Not a bad pickup. Back up pg spot may be sealed.
Did you wind up getting a Twitter? if so hit up my thread in offtopic
  • 0

#7 Lyfestyle

Lyfestyle

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 182 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:09 PM

I gotta be honest, I thought Dally's contract (with its buy-out) would be worth more. There were rumors that Sacramento really wanted it.
  • 0

#8 Cooper

Cooper

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,317 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:13 PM

Not bad only move up two spots but we can dump Livingston and probably buyout brokman. Leuer is actually a decent player might be worth keeping around.
  • 0

#9 rockets best fan

rockets best fan

    glad you're on board, but I been on this boat since it left

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,299 posts
  • Locationhouston

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:17 PM

this is a good stepping stone trade.
  • 0

My new years resolution.....drink that special bottle of wine, take your son on that fishing trip, live each day as if it were my last because everyday of LIFE is special B)


#10 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:18 PM

apparently, as of now, we are keeping all three
  • 0

#11 Lyfestyle

Lyfestyle

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 182 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:21 PM

apparently, as of now, we are keeping all three


I think that assumes we'll be dumping most of the roster in the next couple of days. If we can't make a big move we'll have to get out the ol' cutting knife.
  • 0

#12 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:28 PM

that's why i said "as of now." I believe they'll all be traded for cap for for other teams
  • 0

#13 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:30 PM

Conflicting reports not Ken Berger saying we might be going after Gasol, Ford says we aren't pursuing anymore

Berger: http://www.cbssports...at-howard-gasol
Ford: http://espn.go.com/n...e-bucks-move-12
  • 0

#14 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,626 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:35 PM

Apparently the Hawks are pursuing Gasol for Smith. Just got home, havent read much yet.
  • 0

#15 Alituro

Alituro

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 549 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:44 PM

Not Bad... Livingston can help now and Leuer has some potential, Brockman will go though... So we now have #12, #16 and #18? Still need to break into top 10 if we hope ORL will talk.
  • 0

#16 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,626 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:52 PM

Keeping Livingston almost assures us of getting rid of Lowry OR letting Dragic walk. Only reason I say it is because there are still a few who think we keep both Lowry/Dragic.
  • 0

#17 Sir Thursday

Sir Thursday

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,309 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 27 June 2012 - 10:25 PM

Seems like a really good deal for us. We improve our pick, and Dalembert wasn't going to figure in our long-term plans anyway. From what I saw last year, Leuer played pretty well for the Bucks, not sure why they let him go. Really liking that acquisition, even if it makes our PF situation even more congested. And Livingston is a pretty serviceable backup PG - which I think is actually a good thing. In previous years we've had two PGs competing for the starting spot and getting in each other's way, but having an established starter will hopeful mean we avoid tensions within the squad.

Whether it helps us get those top picks...I'm not sure. Maybe Morey's planning on moving up incrementally? Perhaps his plan is to convince Detroit to trade down - they really want a big man, and all the projections I've seen show Leonard and Zeller being available a bit lower down than #9. And once you've got the #9, maybe you can find the next step on the ladder who's willing to trade with you...kind of ambitious though, and we'd be shedding a lot of assets to make it happen. But that's what they're for :P.

ST
  • 0

#18 Dan G

Dan G

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 261 posts
  • LocationEast Texas

Posted 27 June 2012 - 10:34 PM

Not the trade I wanted to hear but if the 12th pick is more enticing and helps us in the grand scheme than the 14th pick, I guess a small hooray is in order.
  • 0

:lol: All in the game, yo, :D all in the game :lol:!


#19 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,626 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 10:40 PM

Kings may have wanted slightly better than 14 and 16, maybe the 12 is to get that trade going again?
I like the point you made about recently having 2 starter quality PGs constantly battling/worrying about their job. Livingston is a good defender with great size, works well if Parsons/Lee are starting next year brings some defense to the 2nd unit. As far as Leuer, per 40mins he was one of 5 rookies that averaged 15pts and 10rebs-works for me..
  • 0

#20 Sir Thursday

Sir Thursday

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,309 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 27 June 2012 - 10:58 PM

So in what way is #12 better than #14? You get to pick ahead of Milwaukee and Phoenix, which you'd want to do if you suspected you were going after similar players to those teams. Milwaukee wanted a big man, and AFAIK Phoenix are looking for a wing (they keep getting linked to SG types). The sort of players who would be available at that stage...Zeller, Leonard are the primary big men, Ross and Lamb are probably the wing players. Do Sacramento want any of those guys? They've already got a glut of players at the wing, so I can't imagine they're looking there. I guess they could want another big man to pair with Cousins, so Zeller might fit - he's supposed to have a bit of range, which would complement Cousins quite well...

ST
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users