Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  DenverRocket : (07 December 2016 - 09:06 PM) Maybe it is salvageable after all? http://www.espn.com/...nce-offer-sheet
@  ale11 : (07 December 2016 - 08:20 PM) ditto, great read :)
@  DenverRocket : (07 December 2016 - 07:02 PM) Great read, thanks!
@  thejohnnygold : (07 December 2016 - 04:09 PM) Possibly the best article about Morey and what goes into his process. If the balance between subjective and objective decision-making intrigues you then read this article. LINK
@  thejohnnygold : (06 December 2016 - 11:48 PM) Bad, D-Mo! Bad!
@  slick shoes : (06 December 2016 - 07:01 PM) We are in the power position at this point. He can continue to sit out and not get paid while we continue to play without him and build a team that doesn't include him while controlling any move(s) he wants to make. Not smart.
@  DenverRocket : (06 December 2016 - 06:17 PM) Wow! Motiejunas' agent, B.J. Armstrong: "We have our rights. We're not going to show up. We'll see what happens. We'll see what the Rockets do."
@  DenverRocket : (06 December 2016 - 05:40 PM) Rockets could return Motiejunas to restricted free agent status. Working through what happened.
@  DenverRocket : (06 December 2016 - 05:34 PM) According to Feigen: Donatas Motiejunas was a no show for his physical this morning, source said. Rockets weighing options.
@  thejohnnygold : (06 December 2016 - 04:56 PM) But the kids!!!! :)
@  ale11 : (06 December 2016 - 04:34 PM) Read that first paragraph....that dude represents D-Mo....smh
@  ale11 : (06 December 2016 - 04:33 PM) https://theringer.co...acb3#.oarxz63ux
@  DenverRocket : (05 December 2016 - 10:24 PM) He has to pass a physical first (which seems a bit bizarre considering the team doctors know all about his back etc...): ‚Äč
http://www.espn.com/...8078114806362-4
@  DenverRocket : (05 December 2016 - 10:11 PM) Well we've matched it according to Woj
@  thejohnnygold : (03 December 2016 - 05:48 AM) Looking at the structure of the deal I think we match it...unless Morey is concerned about messing up team chemistry.
@  DenverRocket : (03 December 2016 - 12:44 AM) Signed. 4yrs, $37 million. We have 3 days to match.
@  DenverRocket : (01 December 2016 - 05:24 PM) D-Mo close to signing Nets offer sheet according to Woj https://t.co/AGtJj532y0
@  Jatman20 : (29 November 2016 - 03:35 AM) D-Mo took bad advice from his agent. We shall see how it plays out. If he gets multiple deals or works things out with Houston.
@  Jatman20 : (29 November 2016 - 03:33 AM) D-Mo still ends up having to prove himself for one yr for about slightly less than what Houston offered for one yr.
@  Jatman20 : (29 November 2016 - 03:31 AM) probably break even financially....because t everyone loses

Photo

[Woj] Samuel Dalembert traded to Milwaukee


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:31 PM

Adrian Wojnarowski has reported we sent him to Milwaukee as part of a package


Dalembert and the 14th pick go the Bucks for the 12th pick, Jon Brockman, Jon Leurer and Brockman, sources tell Y!

Shaun Livingston also goes to the Rockets as part of the package, sources tell Y!

Edited by Ostrow, 27 June 2012 - 07:36 PM.

  • 0

#2 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:34 PM

I don't know why it posted twice....
  • 0

#3 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,622 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:40 PM

What's livingstons contract look like?
  • 0

#4 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,622 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:45 PM

Heard it also includes brockman and leurer.
  • 0

#5 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:48 PM

Livingston has a team option for 3.5, Brockman is 1mil for next year, Leuer has a TO for 760,000 next year
  • 0

#6 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,622 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:00 PM

Not a bad pickup. Back up pg spot may be sealed.
Did you wind up getting a Twitter? if so hit up my thread in offtopic
  • 0

#7 Lyfestyle

Lyfestyle

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 182 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:09 PM

I gotta be honest, I thought Dally's contract (with its buy-out) would be worth more. There were rumors that Sacramento really wanted it.
  • 0

#8 Cooper

Cooper

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,311 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:13 PM

Not bad only move up two spots but we can dump Livingston and probably buyout brokman. Leuer is actually a decent player might be worth keeping around.
  • 0

#9 rockets best fan

rockets best fan

    glad you're on board, but I been on this boat since it left

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,299 posts
  • Locationhouston

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:17 PM

this is a good stepping stone trade.
  • 0

My new years resolution.....drink that special bottle of wine, take your son on that fishing trip, live each day as if it were my last because everyday of LIFE is special B)


#10 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:18 PM

apparently, as of now, we are keeping all three
  • 0

#11 Lyfestyle

Lyfestyle

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 182 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:21 PM

apparently, as of now, we are keeping all three


I think that assumes we'll be dumping most of the roster in the next couple of days. If we can't make a big move we'll have to get out the ol' cutting knife.
  • 0

#12 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:28 PM

that's why i said "as of now." I believe they'll all be traded for cap for for other teams
  • 0

#13 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:30 PM

Conflicting reports not Ken Berger saying we might be going after Gasol, Ford says we aren't pursuing anymore

Berger: http://www.cbssports...at-howard-gasol
Ford: http://espn.go.com/n...e-bucks-move-12
  • 0

#14 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,622 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:35 PM

Apparently the Hawks are pursuing Gasol for Smith. Just got home, havent read much yet.
  • 0

#15 Alituro

Alituro

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 549 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:44 PM

Not Bad... Livingston can help now and Leuer has some potential, Brockman will go though... So we now have #12, #16 and #18? Still need to break into top 10 if we hope ORL will talk.
  • 0

#16 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,622 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:52 PM

Keeping Livingston almost assures us of getting rid of Lowry OR letting Dragic walk. Only reason I say it is because there are still a few who think we keep both Lowry/Dragic.
  • 0

#17 Sir Thursday

Sir Thursday

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,297 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 27 June 2012 - 10:25 PM

Seems like a really good deal for us. We improve our pick, and Dalembert wasn't going to figure in our long-term plans anyway. From what I saw last year, Leuer played pretty well for the Bucks, not sure why they let him go. Really liking that acquisition, even if it makes our PF situation even more congested. And Livingston is a pretty serviceable backup PG - which I think is actually a good thing. In previous years we've had two PGs competing for the starting spot and getting in each other's way, but having an established starter will hopeful mean we avoid tensions within the squad.

Whether it helps us get those top picks...I'm not sure. Maybe Morey's planning on moving up incrementally? Perhaps his plan is to convince Detroit to trade down - they really want a big man, and all the projections I've seen show Leonard and Zeller being available a bit lower down than #9. And once you've got the #9, maybe you can find the next step on the ladder who's willing to trade with you...kind of ambitious though, and we'd be shedding a lot of assets to make it happen. But that's what they're for :P.

ST
  • 0

#18 Dan G

Dan G

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 257 posts
  • LocationEast Texas

Posted 27 June 2012 - 10:34 PM

Not the trade I wanted to hear but if the 12th pick is more enticing and helps us in the grand scheme than the 14th pick, I guess a small hooray is in order.
  • 0

:lol: All in the game, yo, :D all in the game :lol:!


#19 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,622 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 10:40 PM

Kings may have wanted slightly better than 14 and 16, maybe the 12 is to get that trade going again?
I like the point you made about recently having 2 starter quality PGs constantly battling/worrying about their job. Livingston is a good defender with great size, works well if Parsons/Lee are starting next year brings some defense to the 2nd unit. As far as Leuer, per 40mins he was one of 5 rookies that averaged 15pts and 10rebs-works for me..
  • 0

#20 Sir Thursday

Sir Thursday

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,297 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 27 June 2012 - 10:58 PM

So in what way is #12 better than #14? You get to pick ahead of Milwaukee and Phoenix, which you'd want to do if you suspected you were going after similar players to those teams. Milwaukee wanted a big man, and AFAIK Phoenix are looking for a wing (they keep getting linked to SG types). The sort of players who would be available at that stage...Zeller, Leonard are the primary big men, Ross and Lamb are probably the wing players. Do Sacramento want any of those guys? They've already got a glut of players at the wing, so I can't imagine they're looking there. I guess they could want another big man to pair with Cousins, so Zeller might fit - he's supposed to have a bit of range, which would complement Cousins quite well...

ST
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users