Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  jorgeaam : (29 September 2014 - 09:01 PM) It was a joke, it seemed like Injury Report in there
@  Cooper : (29 September 2014 - 04:03 PM) you're quick
@  jorgeaam : (28 September 2014 - 04:35 AM) Paul George out for the season
@  Buckko : (28 September 2014 - 02:07 AM) Tyreke Evans out 3-5 weeks.
@  Cooper : (27 September 2014 - 01:05 AM) rondo out 6-8 weeks
@  rocketrick : (25 September 2014 - 02:06 PM) I'm not a huge Bill Simmons fan as his "inside information" related to NBA player movement at times is a reach, but today I LOVE me some Bill Simmons! He is willing to say what most everyone feels about one Roger Goodell. Should be a lesson for the NBA prior to the start of the regular season.
@  Cooper : (25 September 2014 - 01:58 AM) Worth the gamble for the suns but was not the best option for the rockets.
@  rocketrick : (25 September 2014 - 12:28 AM) Wow, early reports this morning was 4 years around $50 million and by late this afternoon that had changed to 5 years at $70 million for Eric Bledsoe. Good for him! Much too expensive for the Rockets in my opinion.
@  thenit : (24 September 2014 - 11:51 PM) 5for 70 is what I have seen
@  rocketrick : (24 September 2014 - 01:24 PM) $50 million moreorless per reports.
@  rocketrick : (24 September 2014 - 01:24 PM) Like I posted on numerous occasions, chasing Bledsoe was a waste of time. Reports this morning indicate he is close to signing a 4-year deal for P million moreorless, to stay a Sun going forward.
@  thejohnnygold : (24 September 2014 - 12:37 AM) I believe it is that Harden is insanely good playing off the ball...we simply lack a better ball handler/creator. Hence, Rondo.
@  2016Champions : (23 September 2014 - 05:32 PM) I heard Morey loves Rondo though so there must be something I'm missing.
@  2016Champions : (23 September 2014 - 04:56 PM) Bledsoe played off the ball a lot next to Dragic, right? So wouldn't that make him the better fit in contrast to the ball dominant Rondo?
@  YaoMan : (22 September 2014 - 04:29 PM) Personally I'd rather have Rondo over Bledsoe by far but I'm not sure the chances of getting Rondo are that high but I am hoping
@  redfaithful : (21 September 2014 - 11:40 AM) So many overpaid players in Minnesota... Including a couple ex-Rockets
@  Cooper : (20 September 2014 - 12:48 AM) Bennet? Or they have a couple other young guys.
@  txtdo1411 : (19 September 2014 - 10:29 PM) Did anybody else see that Minny offered Bledsoe a max? I believe they are over the cap, so it would have to be a S&T. I wonder who the Wolves feel they can deal to get Bledsoe.
@  thejohnnygold : (17 September 2014 - 10:46 PM) Nice article about Trevor Ariza. LINK
@  feelingsuper... : (15 September 2014 - 09:01 PM) Okay, I may have been a little harsh down below in my earlier comments but at the very least I agree with Bird, Paul George's comments were thoughtless. Thanks for the link jorgeaam.

Photo

[Woj] Samuel Dalembert traded to Milwaukee


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:31 PM

Adrian Wojnarowski has reported we sent him to Milwaukee as part of a package


Dalembert and the 14th pick go the Bucks for the 12th pick, Jon Brockman, Jon Leurer and Brockman, sources tell Y!

Shaun Livingston also goes to the Rockets as part of the package, sources tell Y!

Edited by Ostrow, 27 June 2012 - 07:36 PM.

  • 0

#2 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:34 PM

I don't know why it posted twice....
  • 0

#3 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,498 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:40 PM

What's livingstons contract look like?
  • 0

#4 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,498 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:45 PM

Heard it also includes brockman and leurer.
  • 0

#5 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 07:48 PM

Livingston has a team option for 3.5, Brockman is 1mil for next year, Leuer has a TO for 760,000 next year
  • 0

#6 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,498 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:00 PM

Not a bad pickup. Back up pg spot may be sealed.
Did you wind up getting a Twitter? if so hit up my thread in offtopic
  • 0

#7 Lyfestyle

Lyfestyle

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 182 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:09 PM

I gotta be honest, I thought Dally's contract (with its buy-out) would be worth more. There were rumors that Sacramento really wanted it.
  • 0

#8 Cooper

Cooper

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,182 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:13 PM

Not bad only move up two spots but we can dump Livingston and probably buyout brokman. Leuer is actually a decent player might be worth keeping around.
  • 0

#9 rockets best fan

rockets best fan

    glad you're on board, but I been on this boat since it left

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,966 posts
  • Locationhouston

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:17 PM

this is a good stepping stone trade.
  • 0

you can only warn a man that the bridge is out.....if he keeps driving he's on his own B)


#10 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:18 PM

apparently, as of now, we are keeping all three
  • 0

#11 Lyfestyle

Lyfestyle

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 182 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:21 PM

apparently, as of now, we are keeping all three


I think that assumes we'll be dumping most of the roster in the next couple of days. If we can't make a big move we'll have to get out the ol' cutting knife.
  • 0

#12 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:28 PM

that's why i said "as of now." I believe they'll all be traded for cap for for other teams
  • 0

#13 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:30 PM

Conflicting reports not Ken Berger saying we might be going after Gasol, Ford says we aren't pursuing anymore

Berger: http://www.cbssports...at-howard-gasol
Ford: http://espn.go.com/n...e-bucks-move-12
  • 0

#14 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,498 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:35 PM

Apparently the Hawks are pursuing Gasol for Smith. Just got home, havent read much yet.
  • 0

#15 Alituro

Alituro

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:44 PM

Not Bad... Livingston can help now and Leuer has some potential, Brockman will go though... So we now have #12, #16 and #18? Still need to break into top 10 if we hope ORL will talk.
  • 0

#16 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,498 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:52 PM

Keeping Livingston almost assures us of getting rid of Lowry OR letting Dragic walk. Only reason I say it is because there are still a few who think we keep both Lowry/Dragic.
  • 0

#17 Sir Thursday

Sir Thursday

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,019 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 27 June 2012 - 10:25 PM

Seems like a really good deal for us. We improve our pick, and Dalembert wasn't going to figure in our long-term plans anyway. From what I saw last year, Leuer played pretty well for the Bucks, not sure why they let him go. Really liking that acquisition, even if it makes our PF situation even more congested. And Livingston is a pretty serviceable backup PG - which I think is actually a good thing. In previous years we've had two PGs competing for the starting spot and getting in each other's way, but having an established starter will hopeful mean we avoid tensions within the squad.

Whether it helps us get those top picks...I'm not sure. Maybe Morey's planning on moving up incrementally? Perhaps his plan is to convince Detroit to trade down - they really want a big man, and all the projections I've seen show Leonard and Zeller being available a bit lower down than #9. And once you've got the #9, maybe you can find the next step on the ladder who's willing to trade with you...kind of ambitious though, and we'd be shedding a lot of assets to make it happen. But that's what they're for :P.

ST
  • 0

#18 Dan G

Dan G

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 182 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 10:34 PM

Not the trade I wanted to hear but if the 12th pick is more enticing and helps us in the grand scheme than the 14th pick, I guess a small hooray is in order.
  • 0

#19 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,498 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 10:40 PM

Kings may have wanted slightly better than 14 and 16, maybe the 12 is to get that trade going again?
I like the point you made about recently having 2 starter quality PGs constantly battling/worrying about their job. Livingston is a good defender with great size, works well if Parsons/Lee are starting next year brings some defense to the 2nd unit. As far as Leuer, per 40mins he was one of 5 rookies that averaged 15pts and 10rebs-works for me..
  • 0

#20 Sir Thursday

Sir Thursday

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,019 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 27 June 2012 - 10:58 PM

So in what way is #12 better than #14? You get to pick ahead of Milwaukee and Phoenix, which you'd want to do if you suspected you were going after similar players to those teams. Milwaukee wanted a big man, and AFAIK Phoenix are looking for a wing (they keep getting linked to SG types). The sort of players who would be available at that stage...Zeller, Leonard are the primary big men, Ross and Lamb are probably the wing players. Do Sacramento want any of those guys? They've already got a glut of players at the wing, so I can't imagine they're looking there. I guess they could want another big man to pair with Cousins, so Zeller might fit - he's supposed to have a bit of range, which would complement Cousins quite well...

ST
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users