I know the question sounds ridiculous. I don’t mean to ruffle feathers or be provocative, I am just curious if I am the only one biased enough to believe that, over the next 5 years, Asik might bring at least as much to the table as Howard.
In order to help you identify my delusions, I have laid out my premises below.
- Dwight Howard’s back surgery looks like it could be one of the most dramatic turning points in NBA history. Prior to his back surgery, Dwight Howard was indisputably one of the best two or three players in the league, and now he’s maybe one of the top 30. To put that in perspective (using ESPN’s NBA Rank), that would be like Kevin Durant or Chris Paul dropping to the level of Pau Gasol or Damian Lillard.
- If Dwight Howard is still not fully recovered from his back surgery 606 days later – and Dwight himself said he isn’t in this radio show yesterday – then it looks unlikely that he will ever return to his former self.
- I worry that Howard could suffer another major injury at any moment, rendering his contract a giant sinkhole in the Rockets’ flexibility. Asik, on the other hand, seems surprisingly stout for a big man, and it wouldn’t be contractual doom even if he were to go down.
- Asik is currently one of the top 40 players in the league, and that’s being conservative. I believe he’s not far behind Joakim Noah or Roy Hibbert, and in fact in RAPM they were dead even last year.
- Layups and corner threes are the most efficient shots in basketball, and the Rockets will get more of those shots with Asik rather than Howard simply because Howard demands post touches, which are less than efficient, to put it delicately.
- Asik will likely improve at a faster rate than Howard simply because he’s a little younger and a lot less experienced. (Also, rumor is that Asik is a much more of a gym rat than Howard, but I have no evidence to support that claim.)
- Asik is likely to age much more gracefully than Howard simply because his game relies much less on athleticism.
Even if you’re not convinced that Asik could be as valuable as Howard over the next 5 years (I’m not convinced myself), you might at least agree that the difference is not awfully large. And if it isn’t, then you have to wonder why the Rockets aren’t also considering trade options for Howard.
Think of it this way. We know that the Rockets cannot get much in return for Asik (sorry, Millsap, Young, and Verejao, but in my book you don’t count as “much”), but presumably the Rockets could get quite a bit in return for Howard. Like, say, Kevin Love? And wouldn’t Asik + Love be a much more devastating front court than post-surgery Howard + your choice of Millsap, Young, or Verejao?
Of course Howard for Love isn’t going to happen, I’m just dabbling in hypotheticals as sports fans do. I’m curious to hear other opinions on this.
View this discussion from the forum.