I can see both sides. TJG believes those were good to great defensive teams, if I'm not mistaken. I agree. 2016 believes that those teams were not as stout defensively than their opponents. Again, most of those matchups I agree with. But they were CLOSE. If our Houston defense came against any of the finals teams in the last 10 years, we'd lose by 40. Just because they weren't the better defensive team, didn't mean they didn't play good to great defense. Shaq was a top notch defender. Not as good as Duncan, but still good nonetheless. Kobe, when dialed in was pretty good defensively. Both sides are valid, but TJG seems to believe that you're belittling those team's defenses by calling them "okay" and "decent." If that was your point, then I agree with him. But if your point was that the other team was better defensively, then I agree. It would be like the Nuggets defense versus the Grizzlies' defense. Both are great defenses, but it's clear that the Grizz are better with Gasol. If the Nuggets won that matchup it would be the offense winning over the defense. But to say that the Grizz had an "okay" defense after the fact would be asinine.