Comments on: On McGrady – Part 1

By: On McGrady – Part 3 | Red94 | essays and musings on the nba & houston rockets

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:35:04 +0000

[...] I explained in Part 1, Tracy McGrady possesses this ability. However, it still remains to be seen whether he can be [...]

By: ugg outlet

ugg outlet — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:51:28 +0000

I love you.

By: Thoughts on Nuggets – Rockets: More on McGrady | Red94 | essays and musings on the nba & houston rockets

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:48:16 +0000

[...] I said in Part 1, the question is whether the positives Tracy brings from his court vision can outweigh his lack of [...]

By: ugg outlet

ugg outlet — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:18:25 +0000

I love you.

By: Thoughts on Pistons – Rockets: McGrady’s Debut | Red94 | essays and musings on the nba & houston rockets

Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:06:07 +0000

[...] I said earlier, the above play is how I envision McGrady fitting into this offense. If he is physically capable, [...]

By: NIJ

NIJ — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:59:28 +0000

I don’t think it would require a drastic adjustment. All those times the Rockets dump it into Chuck Hayes to initiate the set, which is quite often, can be McGrady instead. I see PLENTY of offensive sets from the Rockets where someone is holding/dribbling the ball for 5 or more seconds. McGrady’s ‘ball-stopping’ affecting the Rockets motion offense is overblown.

By: VBG

VBG — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:35:08 +0000

Excellant post. I agree 100%. If T-Mac can come back to a reasonable level, we can still run a motion offense but it would be through him.

He can elevate the Rockets into quite a solid playoff team capable of upsetting anyone.