NBA Analyst Confirms: Anthony Edwards Shines Despite Game 4 Loss!

Anthony Edwards, noted as a potential new icon of the NBA by leading his team, the Minnesota Timberwolves, towards the Finals, managed to score 16 points by shooting 5-of-13 in a crucial Game 4 defeat against the Oklahoma City Thunder on Monday night. Edwards, constantly pressured by the Thunder’s defense, was compelled to play more as a playmaker rather than a scorer, resulting in him turning the ball over five times. This was clearly not what Minnesota hoped for, and the situation was exacerbated by a mere five-point contribution from Julius Randle. Despite this, Edwards was reluctant to admit he had a bad game when questioned about his performance afterwards.

“I don’t see it as a struggle,” Edwards remarked. “They implemented a strong game plan that forced us to pass the ball. For me, it was really about finding myself heavily guarded, but I believe I made the right decisions throughout the night, so I wouldn’t say I struggled. I didn’t shoot enough to consider it a struggle.”

Ultimately, this boils down to a matter of semantics that does not alter the fact that Edwards was unable to deliver what his team needed in their most critical game of the season. It’s not vitally crucial to precisely dissect how much of this outcome was due to the Thunder’s efforts and how much fault lies with Edwards himself. If he truly believes that taking more than 13 shots would lead to victory, it would be surprising not to see him assert himself more with the season at stake.

On Get Up Tuesday morning, Kendrick Perkins voiced agreement with Edwards’s self-assessment.

“He didn’t have a bad game,” the analyst stated. “They put up 126 points in regular time. They hit 51 percent of their shots from the field and 43 percent from three. It was their defense that let them down, not his scoring.”

There’s some truth in that. Scoring 126 points in a 48-minute game typically should secure a win. Thus, it’s hard to argue that Edwards’s lower scoring directly placed them at a disadvantage. However, it’s difficult to envision another superstar receiving such fervent defense after failing to take the lead in a crucial game. It’s entirely possible that both the team’s defense was lacking and Edwards scoring 30 points could have made victory easier.

There’s a need for a nuanced understanding here.

Stephen A. Smith approached it differently, not dwelling on the term “struggle” but rather focusing on the essence of what defines a superstar and their responsibilities.

Game 5 of this series is set for Wednesday night at 8:30 p.m. ET.

More NBA Coverage on Sports Illustrated