Sept 5 Police Confirm Skull Is Julian Story — Here’s What Changes Now

Created on:

By: Jessica Morrison

South Australia Police confirmed on Sept 5 that a skull found July 31 belongs to Julian Story, the 39‑year‑old whose beheaded body was discovered in June. This new forensic ID turns an already harrowing case into a clearer criminal timeline and raises fresh questions about motive, disposal, and public safety. Sources: People magazine reporting and an SA Police statement. Opinion: the confirmation tightens prosecutorial options but also risks reopening community trauma. What will investigators do next — and how might this change bail, charges, or public appeals?

What The Sept 5 Skull ID Reveals About This Reality TV Murder

Police announced on Sept 5 that forensic testing confirmed the skull recovered July 31 is Julian Story’s, a key new fact that links the July remains to the June homicide. The victim’s body — found June 19 without a skull — and the later skull recovery close the evidentiary gap investigators have chased for months. For readers: this confirmation narrows the timeline and may influence how prosecutors frame dismemberment in charging documents. It also intensifies scrutiny on the accused’s movements between June 17 (estimated time of death) and July 31 (skull recovery). What questions should you ask about forensic delays and evidence handling?

5 Fast Facts That Change What You Know About This Case Today

  • Tamika Chesser, 34, is charged after Julian Story’s remains were found at their apartment.
  • The beheaded body was discovered by police on June 19, 2025.
  • A skull was recovered by a member of the public on July 31, 2025.
  • South Australia Police confirmed the skull identification on Sept 5, 2025.
  • Authorities continue to ask the public for information about Chesser’s movements.

Each bullet states who, what, when, and immediate impact — quick facts to orient you as the story develops.

Why The Skull ID On Sept 5 Changes The Investigation Now

The confirmed skull ID turns previously separated evidence into a single forensic narrative: body discovered June 19, skull found July 31, ID confirmed Sept 5. That sequence strengthens the prosecution’s ability to argue dismemberment and concealment rather than an isolated death, and it narrows windows for witness timelines. For readers: that matters because tighter timelines usually increase pressure for new witness testimony and forensic re‑examination. Investigators can prioritize CCTV, phone pings, and public tips tied to those exact dates — and you may see renewed public appeals.

What The Forensic Timeline Shows: June 17 Estimate To July 31 Recovery

Police estimate the killing occurred around June 17; the body was located June 19, missing its skull. The skull’s recovery on July 3142 days later — prompted forensic comparison and the Sept 5 identification. That multi‑week gap explains why the case remained incomplete and why DNA/forensic labs required time to confirm identity. For readers worried about delays: forensic work can be slow but the eventual match is often decisive in court.

Key Case Metrics: Ages, Dates, And Evidence Chain That Matter

KPI Value + Unit Change/Impact
Victim Identified Julian Story, 39 Skull ID confirms remains
Suspect Charged Tamika Chesser, 34 Arrested June; faces murder charge
Evidence Timeline Body June 19 → Skull July 31 → ID Sept 5 Confirms dismemberment, extends probe

Final insight: The timeline now gives prosecutors firmer dates to pursue witness, phone, and CCTV leads.

What The Police Timeline And Forensics Mean For Legal Steps Ahead

With the skull formally identified, prosecutors can refine charges and evidence lists; defense teams will respond by questioning timelines, lab processing and chain‑of‑custody. Expect faster pretrial motions, renewed public appeals for witnesses, and possible forensic re‑tests. For families and neighbors: this confirmation may bring painful closure but also reopen emotional wounds; for readers, it signals the case will stay active in court and media for months. How will new evidence shift plea talks or trial strategies?

What Sept 2025 Confirmation Means For The Victim’s Family, The Public, And The Case

This Sept 5 ID is both a forensic milestone and a public moment: it validates investigators’ work and gives the victim’s family a specific conclusion about remains. It also fuels fresh questions about when and how the skull was moved and whether others have information. The investigation continues — and the police are asking anyone with details about movements around June 17-July 31 to contact Crime Stoppers. Will new witnesses step forward now that identity is confirmed?

Final engagement loop: If You Had One Tip Linked To Those Dates, Would You Call Now Or Wait — What Would Make You Speak Up?

Sources

  • https://people.com/reality-star-accused-beheading-boyfriend-dog-found-skull-11804224
  • https://www.police.sa.gov.au/sa-police-news-assets/front-page-news/remains-located-in-port-lincoln-identified
  • https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2025/sep/05/australia-news-live-albanese-trump-tariffs-meeting-porepunkah-police-officer-funerals-ntwnfb

Similar posts:

Leave a Comment