The Disney+/Hulu/Max Bundle Saves You $847 Annually
Max Streams These 8 Oscar Winners Nobody’s Watching
“We’re going to kill people.” The line landed like a shockwave after remarks made on Oct. 23, 2025, and it instantly raised legal and diplomatic alarms. Within days reporters, rights groups and allied governments pressed for answers as the White House defended recent maritime strikes tied to a counter-drug campaign. Officials confirm 9 strikes and at least 37 deaths linked to the operations, a fact that makes the comment a global flashpoint. How should citizens and lawmakers respond as the fallout unfolds this month?
What you need to know about the “We’re going to kill people” remark
• The president said the line on Oct. 23, 2025, sparking immediate diplomatic alarm.
• U.S. forces have carried out 9 strikes tied to alleged drug-trafficking vessels.
• At least 37 people have died in those strikes, prompting international inquiries.
Why this line hit like a bombshell in October 2025
The remark arrived as a blunt summary of an escalating military campaign against suspected drug shipments, and it reframed the strikes as policy rather than isolated operations. Legal scholars quickly questioned whether the president can authorize lethal force without a congressional declaration, while allies demanded details about targets and evidence. If you follow U.S. foreign-policy fallout, this matters because the comment turns an enforcement tactic into a headline-making doctrine that could reshape oversight.
The Constitution doesn’t permit a president to act as the legislature and judiciary on top of being the chief executive.
If it’s war, he must go to Congress.
If it’s crime, he must go to court.
When there’s no imminent danger, there’s no justification for unilateral strikes. https://t.co/cBm8ri5EBB
— Justin Amash (@justinamash) October 23, 2025
Night Flight Plus Streams Cult Classics Cable Won’t Touch Anymore
Rotate Your Subscriptions Like This to Save $1,200 This Year
Who is backing or blasting this move, and why are reactions so fierce today
Supporters frame the line as decisive action against cartels blamed for U.S. overdose deaths, arguing speed saves lives. Critics call it extrajudicial and dangerous, pointing to civilian deaths – including a Colombian fisherman whose family denies any cartel ties. Media and politicians traded raw takes this week, and human-rights groups want independent investigations. Which side do you trust when the evidence is classified and casualties mount?
https://t.co/gMJuvDR8Nz https://t.co/QtJfNsF3ou pic.twitter.com/3m7TbQ0mLu
— Stuart Stevens (@stuartpstevens) October 24, 2025
Numbers that show the clash and immediate fallout this week
| KPI | Value + Unit | Change/Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Strikes authorized | 9 strikes | Rapid escalation versus last month |
| Deaths reported | 37 people | Civilian deaths increased scrutiny |
| Remark date | Oct. 23, 2025 | Sparked diplomatic and legal fallout |
Who spoke these words – and why the speaker matters now
“Quote,” said Donald Trump, President of the United States, when reporters asked about plans to target suspected traffickers. The president’s title gives the line immediate policy weight because only the executive can order military operations, and only Congress can declare war. That duality is why the identity matters: a statement from a private citizen would be one thing, but this was presidential, and its legal and diplomatic ripple effects are already visible.
What lasts beyond this quote in 2025 – and what will change for Americans?
Expect continued political fights over oversight, legal memos, and congressional hearings after these 9 strikes and 37 deaths. If investigations find insufficient evidence, U.S. partnerships and border strategy could shift significantly. Will lawmakers force new limits on military action in 2025?
Sources
- https://people.com/trump-says-just-going-to-kill-people-who-are-allegedly-trafficking-drugs-abroad-11836283
- https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/22/politics/us-military-strike-pacific-8th
- https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdjzw3gplv7o
Jessica Morrison is a seasoned entertainment writer with over a decade of experience covering television, film, and pop culture. After earning a degree in journalism from New York University, she worked as a freelance writer for various entertainment magazines before joining red94.net. Her expertise lies in analyzing television series, from groundbreaking dramas to light-hearted comedies, and she often provides in-depth reviews and industry insights. Outside of writing, Jessica is an avid film buff and enjoys discovering new indie movies at local festivals.