Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox
|
ESPN: Rockets set sights on moving up in draft (targeting Drummond/Dwight)
#41
Posted 26 June 2012 - 12:56 PM
#42
Posted 26 June 2012 - 02:08 PM
#43
Posted 26 June 2012 - 02:19 PM
I really cannot see Drummond being a Hasheem. Hasheem was no where near the athlethe Drummond is. Drummond could easily come in as a rookie and put up a solid 10PPG and 7RPG and 2BPG. Not great but he will grow into a player. He will score easy buckets from running the floor and catching the alley. The problem with Hasheem was that he never really played much american basketball and was surrounded with no talent at center to coach or groom him into a player. Drummond will have Camby/McHale and Hakeem leading the way for him.
My problem is more with labeling guys "Dwight 2.0" or some such nonsense. If he truly was Dwight 2.0, he'd be the undisputed #1 pick rather than being projected as about the 5th overall pick. He's got virtually no offensive game not to mention that his motor and overall interest in the game of basketball have been questioned, which makes me skeptical of his ability to score by simply running the floor. I think the team that drafts him will have a Derrick Favors-like situation: hopefully he'll be good enough in 3 or 4 years to warrant significant minutes (around the time he hits free agency and commands $12m a year due to his size).
#44
Posted 26 June 2012 - 02:40 PM
Not sure what it would take to get ATL interested, but they're paying Joe Johnson and Al Horford 32-35 mil per year through 15/16 (Johnson makes 25 million at the end of his contract, is this real life?) and that's a lot of money to finish outside of the top 4 in your division every year. Gotta figure Smith wants out next season and that Hawks team is bereft of any sort of real depth.
I guess the big problem with this is what would ATL want from the Rockets, assuming they've given up the speculated 5th & 8th picks, plus Dalembert and KMart to match salaries.
#45
Posted 26 June 2012 - 02:51 PM
Everyone knows DH is a great player and it takes no complex math to figure that out. We pay Morey big bucks to use his math thingamafloggies and whirlygigs to find the best value in any player available. Now is his best ever opportunity to shine. I say let him go to work on the draft and see what he can pull out of his (hat). A perfect opportunity to evaluate Morey's merit. Take Drummond for instance, He's way more athletic than say, Leonard or Zeller, but Morey's math may give more value to the latter two, who knows at this point? After stewing a couple days over this, I say no to DH. I'd rather take my chances on developing the DH-Diva-Killer. I could see DH pulling something like a minor or fake injury, blackmailing for a trade or just whining constantly about his situation, he strikes me as that type of a B****, with his shenanigans in ORL. It's a shame that we're losing Lowry this summer and not letting him pout with DH.
Two top tens is something we shouldn't pass up, and it's a much cheaper gamble with much higher potential IMO. Maybe Morey is playing the "get DH" angle only to snooker TOR and SAC to give their picks up, with their respective GMs uttering "yeah right, he'll never stay" under their breath.
#46
Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:12 PM
Chase, loved seeing you fly at the rim and light on fire from behind the 3-pt line, but you would disappear WAY too often in big moments.
#47
Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:15 PM
The question is what it would take to land him. You've already lost Lowry and the picks for Howard, presumably. Some combination of Martin or Dally to match salaries.
What is Luis Scola's trade value?
EDIT: I mean Josh Smith. LOL
Edited by Rahat Huq, 26 June 2012 - 03:22 PM.
I'm an idiot.
#48
Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:18 PM
#49
Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:22 PM
LOL, thanks.Does Josh Howard actually have any trade value or did you mean Josh Smith?
#50
Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:22 PM
Does Josh Howard actually have any trade value or did you mean Josh Smith?
Seriously? Of course he meant Josh Smith.
#51
Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:31 PM
#52
Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:32 PM
Seriously? Of course he meant Josh Smith.
Do you know that Josh Howard and Dwight Howard weren't childhood friends? it's possible. I figured he meant Smith but who knows. They should also go after Morris. He'd be VERY easy to get.
#53
Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:52 PM
Best center in the league.
Would make our team playoff caliber.
Possibility of signing another star.
Excite fans for one year.
Con's of Dwight:
We get a spoiled Child who isn't mature enough for his fame.
We lose most of our core team and bench.
We miss out on another star because they know Dwight will not sign with Houston next year.
We lose Dwight in one year, have the 24th pick, no nucleus for a team and can't rebuild until the following year.
We have to deal with media BS with Dwight who could fake injury or have a real injury from back.
In a year we become the laughing stock of the league with no star......again.
Players who we thought would be busts in this years draft become decent players. Drummond, Rivers, Henson, Zeller, Waiters, Leonard.
And in the end after one year with Dwight, we end up back where we started before we had Dwight. A poor team just good enough to miss the playoffs and get the 14th pick.....again!
Not seeing the logic with Dwight! Personally if I were a star, I would rather play around the talent we have now than Dwight. Players will know that Dwight will not remain in Houston and therfore decide to sign elsewhere. What other star will say, "I'll sign a long-term max contract with you, knowing that you will lose Dwight and I will be left on a team that can't make a playoff run!"????? Common Sense guys!
#54
Posted 26 June 2012 - 04:02 PM
Con's of Dwight:
We get a spoiled Child who isn't mature enough for his fame.
We lose most of our core team and bench.
We miss out on another star because they know Dwight will not sign with Houston next year.
We lose Dwight in one year, have the 24th pick, no nucleus for a team and can't rebuild until the following year.
We have to deal with media BS with Dwight who could fake injury or have a real injury from back.
In a year we become the laughing stock of the league with no star......again.
Players who we thought would be busts in this years draft become decent players. Drummond, Rivers, Henson, Zeller, Waiters, Leonard.
I think you're missing it, here. On point one: our best CURRENT player is a spoiled pussy.
Losing our core team and bench doesn't frighten me much as these are a collection of players that can't even make the playoffs.
If Dwight does want to leave, we'd be in a position to offer him a much, much larger contract than he could get from another team. Thus, getting something in the form of a sign-and-trade is likely. You wouldn't lose him for nothing.
I'd rather deal with media BS than be a total irrelevant non-story as the Rockets have been for 3 years now.
I'd rather be a laughing stock than a 9th-place team as you're more likely to get a better pick.
No star is even considering coming here without Dwight. Howard makes us relevant and if you're a star, playing with Howard for even one year is far more attractive than Houston without him.
#55
Posted 26 June 2012 - 04:57 PM
Saying you have Dwight 2.0 in a player that may never even be a starter in the league is insane. Hasheem Thabeet, anyone?
Hasheem weighs like 150 pounds and is unathletic, Drummond has a 7-6 wingspan and is a solid 270+ he's a freak athlete. I'm not saying he's as good as Howard right now but he's a similar prospect as Howard was when he came out.Saying you have Dwight 2.0 in a player that may never even be a starter in the league is insane. Hasheem Thabeet, anyone?
#56 Guest_RedStewie_*
Posted 26 June 2012 - 06:29 PM
On the other hand, I agree it might be a problem for free agents looking for a ring and stability to come here cos this will be similar to Lebron's last year in Cleveland- No quality free agent wanted to be the dummy stuck behind once Lebron left town.
#57
Posted 26 June 2012 - 06:35 PM
#58 Guest_RedStewie_*
Posted 26 June 2012 - 06:38 PM
cos there is really nothing out there, i think there might be more activity tomorrow.There's been a lull in any new rumor/information and I don't like it.
Lol unless you wanna bandy around fake rumors but that will just be heartbreaking for those that take it seriously lol
#59
Posted 26 June 2012 - 07:05 PM
I think you're missing it, here. On point one: our best CURRENT player is a spoiled pussy. Losing our core team and bench doesn't frighten me much as these are a collection of players that can't even make the playoffs. If Dwight does want to leave, we'd be in a position to offer him a much, much larger contract than he could get from another team. Thus, getting something in the form of a sign-and-trade is likely. You wouldn't lose him for nothing. I'd rather deal with media BS than be a total irrelevant non-story as the Rockets have been for 3 years now. I'd rather be a laughing stock than a 9th-place team as you're more likely to get a better pick. No star is even considering coming here without Dwight. Howard makes us relevant and if you're a star, playing with Howard for even one year is far more attractive than Houston without him.
What i find funny in your post is that I say Dwights will leave after one year because he doesn't want to play here, You then reply with if Dwights does want to leave, we are in the position to offer him way more money! LOL If he wants to leave because he doesn't want to be here, Money wouldn't matter! Also I am pretty sure he is financially set already, along with the fact other teams will be able to give him the MAX (which is set at a price that you can't go above) contract. Further, you missed my point on no other star wanting to join because even with Dwight, they would choose not to sign a contract because Dwight would be leaving. Yeah!!! Let's trade him before next years deadline! Now we traded everything for a half year of Dwight and nothing to show for it! Our team as it is, with more experience and a full offseason are capable of making a playoff seed. So whats the point of getting Dwight, only to lose in the playoffs, like we could do without him and lose out on building upon the pieces we have. Dwight doesn't make us relevant, Dwight makes us a relevant first round playoff loser!
#60 Guest_RedStewie_*
Posted 26 June 2012 - 07:20 PM
Even if he decides to leave Houston, we can still get something for Dwight from New Jersey in a sign and trade. Dwight would prefer a sign and trade so that he can get all his money and years as opposed to losing a year and 20+ mil.
So even if we rent him for a year, we might still get something back for him.
However i agree with your post about free agents not wanting to sign because they don't know if Dwight will be leaving similar to lebron in Cleveland last year
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users