Fg% can be a very misleading measure of efficiency, and you demonstrated that to perfection.
That's why I put fg% and eFG%
|
Posted 09 August 2013 - 04:31 AM
Fg% can be a very misleading measure of efficiency, and you demonstrated that to perfection.
Posted 09 August 2013 - 04:31 AM
Why so Serious?
Posted 09 August 2013 - 04:34 AM
That's why I put fg% and eFG%
"We're not satisfied with where we're at, but we're optimistic on where things will go from here" - Daryl Morey
Posted 09 August 2013 - 04:38 AM
But you didn't put ts%
Edited by Knickabokkaz, 09 August 2013 - 04:38 AM.
Posted 09 August 2013 - 04:45 AM
I didnt put out alot of stats, I put the ones that are most talked about
"We're not satisfied with where we're at, but we're optimistic on where things will go from here" - Daryl Morey
Posted 09 August 2013 - 05:14 AM
Is that how your 2k13 campaign went?
You didn't say no one in basketball has ever come back from 0-3, you said NO ONE has come back from 0-3. I clearly gave an example in which a professional team went on to win four in a row after falling behind 0-3. Now due to proving my point, you holler semantics to try to the ignore the other fact about how it built momentum causing a easy victory in the next series. Which I then use to form my opinion that the Rockets would have beaten the Memphis Tans given Lin stayed on the bench and let the Rockets win the series with the Thunder.
Posted 16 August 2013 - 08:51 PM
http://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/1ki6w2/iam_the_houston_rockets_gm_ama_offseason_addition/
Edited by 2016Champions, 16 August 2013 - 08:52 PM.
"We're not satisfied with where we're at, but we're optimistic on where things will go from here" - Daryl Morey
Posted 16 August 2013 - 08:54 PM
Posted 16 August 2013 - 11:26 PM
Posted 17 August 2013 - 01:48 AM
Well I guess that ends that. Morey's on our side.
Posted 18 August 2013 - 10:08 PM
Posted 18 August 2013 - 10:31 PM
it's not like the gm of any team is going to bag on any of his players no matter how poorly they play.
"We're not satisfied with where we're at, but we're optimistic on where things will go from here" - Daryl Morey
Posted 18 August 2013 - 10:38 PM
it's not like the gm of any team is going to bag on any of his players no matter how poorly they play.
Can't face the facts friend? It is true, denial is always easier.
Posted 18 August 2013 - 10:40 PM
Why so Serious?
Posted 19 August 2013 - 12:55 AM
Some people truly hate Lin, but most of Lin's detractors point that you are basically paying him 25 M through three years as if it were a rookie deal. If you we are truly believing that his NY play was some sort of ceilling and not the norm, is it worth 25 M?
Don't get me wrong, I do like Lin and I do like him to be our point guarde because he is smart enough (he went to Harvard!) to adapt his game and thrive, what I'm trying to say is that at some point I do understand the detractors (NOT the haters) who feel that he is overpaid and we could somehow relocate that salary in two or three players that could also adapt or even fit better in our roster, giving us a more complete roster.
Right now, I'm all in with him (I'm not a lover either) until he proves he won't be able to excel in his role given the time and effort.
Posted 19 August 2013 - 01:15 AM
What was unfactual about my post?Can't face the facts friend? It is true, denial is always easier.
Posted 19 August 2013 - 01:18 AM
I was not saying he wasnt right but if you're going to sit there and tell me any player is a great player because their own gm says he's good that's just ridiculous. They have a vested interest for all their players to be seen as good.I was waiting for someone to say that. Morey is making stuff up to support his player! Lol.
Posted 19 August 2013 - 01:20 AM
Some people truly hate Lin, but most of Lin's detractors point that you are basically paying him 25 M through three years as if it were a rookie deal. If you we are truly believing that his NY play was some sort of ceilling and not the norm, is it worth 25 M?
Don't get me wrong, I do like Lin and I do like him to be our point guarde because he is smart enough (he went to Harvard!) to adapt his game and thrive, what I'm trying to say is that at some point I do understand the detractors (NOT the haters) who feel that he is overpaid and we could somehow relocate that salary in two or three players that could also adapt or even fit better in our roster, giving us a more complete roster.
Right now, I'm all in with him (I'm not a lover either) until he proves he won't be able to excel in his role given the time and effort.
How much does he worth then, to those detractors?...
LOF here.
Posted 19 August 2013 - 01:43 AM
For whatever it's worth, there are a lot of inferior guards making a similar amount.Some people truly hate Lin, but most of Lin's detractors point that you are basically paying him 25 M through three years as if it were a rookie deal. If you we are truly believing that his NY play was some sort of ceilling and not the norm, is it worth 25 M?
Don't get me wrong, I do like Lin and I do like him to be our point guarde because he is smart enough (he went to Harvard!) to adapt his game and thrive, what I'm trying to say is that at some point I do understand the detractors (NOT the haters) who feel that he is overpaid and we could somehow relocate that salary in two or three players that could also adapt or even fit better in our roster, giving us a more complete roster.
Right now, I'm all in with him (I'm not a lover either) until he proves he won't be able to excel in his role given the time and effort.
"We're not satisfied with where we're at, but we're optimistic on where things will go from here" - Daryl Morey
Posted 19 August 2013 - 01:49 AM
He even told you why Lin is good and why he can't stand Lin haters who make stupid accusations. He wasn't just saying nice things about him, he was saying why he is very valuable to his team and why he supports him but you refuse to acknowledge because you're in denial that he supports Lin.I was not saying he wasnt right but if you're going to sit there and tell me any player is a great player because their own gm says he's good that's just ridiculous. They have a vested interest for all their players to be seen as good.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users