The Rockets Daily – January 23, 2013

USA! USA! - It’s no surprise that Dwight Howard and James Harden have been included in the 28-man pool of names that Team USA will be chosen from for the next three summers.  Howard began his international career back in 2006, but since winning gold in the 2008 Beijing Olympics he has missed the last six years, including his time away for back surgery.  And Harden, whose profile has only risen since he came to Houston, even made the gold medal-winning team at the 2012 London Olympics when he was just a sixth-man for the Oklahoma City Thunder.  The complete list:

Backcourt: Harden, Bradley Beal, Steph Curry, Gordon Hayward, Andre Iguodala, Kyrie Irving, Kyle Korver, Damian Lillard, Chris Paul, Derrick Rose, Klay Thompson, Russell Westbrook and Deron Williams.

Frontcourt: Howard, LaMarcus Aldridge, Carmello Anthony, Tyson Chandler, DeMarcus Cousins, Anthony Davis, Andre Drummond, Kevin Durant, Kenneth Faried, Paul George, Blake Griffin, LeBron James, Kawhi Leonard, David Lee and Kevin Love.

What is surprising though, is one name that was left off the list: Chandler Parsons.  And rather than give any kind of diplomatic coach-speak, Parsons opened up and told us how he really feels.

“I’m not happy about it,” Parsons said. “I’m frustrated. I feel like I definitely belong on that team, can help and be a good piece to the team. I think my versatile game would translate well to that team. I’m upset and frustrated I didn’t make it.”

And (with a heavy dose of bias sprinkled on) I agree with him.  You can make a case for young guys like Beal and Hayward, who provide youth and variety over adding a third Rocket player.  I imagine David Lee got in as something of a lifetime achievement award, although his play does fit the international game even more so than NBA-ball.  Kyle Korver provides something few others in the world can offer, and Kawhi Leonard is probably a wash with Parsons.  But names like Deron Williams and Kenneth Faried seem out of place next to the elite players featured on this list.  Williams, in the few games he manages to suit up, has been a shell of his former self.  Faried has failed to continue his development, and without one of the deepest rosters in the league to run with, may have even regressed.

Parsons has already shown that his game fits perfectly playing next to other stars, and while he may not have made the senior-Olympic team, he definitely deserved a shot to play in the World Cup of basketball in Spain this summer.

Hack-a-Harden - Grantland’s Kirk Goldsberry controls the NBA shot chart game.  And he loves talking Morey-ball.  More specifically, he loves talking James Harden.  This time, it’s about Harden’s innate ability to draw fouls all over the court.

According to data collected by the league, James Harden ranks fourth in shooting fouls drawn, while Howard is fifth. However, Harden is the only guard in the top five, which speaks to his unusual knack of getting to the line…

Despite attempting only 223 shots within eight feet of the hoop this season, Harden has drawn 84 shooting fouls in that zone. In other words, Harden draws 38 shooting fouls per 100 shot attempts close to the basket. The NBA average is 22. Harden has the highest such ratio in the league close to the basket. The only other player who’s close is Kevin Durant, the best scorer on planet Earth, who has drawn 37 shooting fouls per 100 close-range attempts.

While Harden’s free throws per game are down from last year’s astronomical 10.2pg, at 8.9 he still shoots well over 2 free throws per game more than the next highest guard.  And as Goldsberry states in the piece, a two-shot foul for James Harden translates to 1.6 points-per-possession, a number that dwarfs Portland’s league-leading 1.1 ppp.

The Dwight Howard-James Harden Rockets have started taking some flak nationally for the way their games can devolve into whistle-stopping free throw contests (I’m looking at you, Simmons).  But the Rockets style of play is predicated on taking as many of the most efficient shots on the court as possible, and nothing beats free shots from the “opportunity” stripe.  So do your thing, James.

Stats”R”Us - Some interesting numbers came out after last night’s win over the Sacramento Kings.  Via Twitter:

What’s really remarkable about that Beverley number is that against two high-scoring point guards, Damian Lillard and Isaiah Thomas, Beverley was able to maintain such a high plus-minus.  And it’s not like he just benefited from his five-man unit holding down the opposition’s lineup in his time on the court; he was +13 (Kings) and +14 (Blazers) higher than his next closest teammate in either contest.  That means in neither game did the opposition ever get any kind of sustained runs while Beverley was on the floor.  We knew he played D like a wolverine, but that is outstanding.

And as for the second stat, my initial reaction was that Terrence Jones’ run of late, and his propensity for beast mode-ing around the rim, would lead to something like that kind of stat.  But seeing as Jones didn’t play in the last two games (although he did absolutely destroy Milwaukee inside), that can mean only one thing: Dwight Howard is getting it back.  He averaged nearly 70% shooting over that three-game run, and had four offensive rebounds in each contest.  Not to mention the Rockets in general, but especially Omri Casspi, have rebounded their own misses at a high rate (44 total, +8) over that same span.  What it also means is that after going so frigidly, arctic, T1000-in-liquid-nitrogen cold in the second half against the Thunder, the Rockets and their coaching staff have switched gears and are playing a little more inside-out.

So while the Rockets are still mired in a season-long shooting slump from deep, at least fans can take solace that at least the Rockets are still fighting for all those misses.

View this discussion from the forum.

This entry was posted in columns and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
Login to leave a comment.
Total comments: 10
  • Mitchell Felker says 8 months ago

    I really wanted Parsons to make the World Championship roster because of what it would do to his development as a player. Look at the next season of some of the key players on the 2010 WC roster:
    Derrick Rose- MVP
    Kevin Durant- improved overall game
    Russell Westbrook- named 2nd team all-NBA
    Kevin Love- Most Improved Player
    Tyson Chandler- rejuvenated career, key piece to Mavs championship team, named All-Defensive 2nd team

    This is why I believed Harden would do what he did last season after the Olympics and wanted Parsons on the WC roster.

    I never thought of it that way, BSH. That was a point Simmons hammered home after the 2010 world champs a few years ago. Steph Curry was on that team as well. We should ignore the fact that it was probably the last (good) meaningful moment of Lamar Odom and Chauncey Billups careers though. Good for all those young guys, career ending for the oldies

  • Mitchell Felker says 8 months ago

    Steven, good question. Maybe Ill address it in the Daily tonight....

  • Steven says 8 months ago

    I'm in agreement with TTDN. Don't get me wrong--Parsons is great and I want to keep him, but Hayward would be putting up excellent numbers if he were in Parsons' position.

    But wouldn't Parsons' being putting up Hayward numbers if he was the number 1 option in Utah? It's hard to compare how one players numbers would relate when moving from option 1 to 3 unless you have the numbers from when Parsons is the number one option (ppm when without Hardin/ Howard). That was the one stat that made me know Hardin would excel as a number 1 option. He averaged like 35 points / 40 minutes when playing without Durant, his last season with OKC, where can we find the stats to Parsons number without Howard/Hardin on the floor with him?
  • thejohnnygold says 8 months ago

    I'm in agreement with TTDN. Don't get me wrong--Parsons is great and I want to keep him, but Hayward would be putting up excellent numbers if he were in Parsons' position.

  • Buckko says 8 months ago

    Parsons is a better defender, rebounder and has a far more efficient shot selection.

  • timetodienow1234567 says 8 months ago Exactly incubus2803 Hayward is the number one option on a bad team with no one to draw double teams (Parsons has 2) he has no spacing since Favors' jumpshot is still a work in progress and Kanter lol. He also was the defacto PG until Burke got healthy. I don't think either is a clear cut favorite. I'll roll with Parsons since he's a Rocket but maybe it's because I actually watch his games since he's on my fantasy team , that I don't think it's as ridiculous as you guys seem to think. Plus his game is better translated to the international stage.
  • Incubus2803 says 8 months ago Comparing Parsons and Hayward is tough. Who's to say Hayward's efficiently wouldn't pick up playing on a better team.
  • BallSoHarden says 8 months ago

    I really wanted Parsons to make the World Championship roster because of what it would do to his development as a player. Look at the next season of some of the key players on the 2010 WC roster:
    Derrick Rose- MVP
    Kevin Durant- improved overall game
    Russell Westbrook- named 2nd team all-NBA
    Kevin Love- Most Improved Player
    Tyson Chandler- rejuvenated career, key piece to Mavs championship team, named All-Defensive 2nd team

    This is why I believed Harden would do what he did last season after the Olympics and wanted Parsons on the WC roster.

  • feelingsupersonic says 8 months ago Great Daily, thanks Mitchell!
  • Buckko says 8 months ago

    Parsons is far better and more efficient than Hayward. He has also been better than Kwai IMO.