If you haven’t yet, take the time to listen to Bill Simmons’ interview with Daryl Morey from the Sloan Conference. There are some incredibly interesting nuggets. Probably not a surprise as Bill has always been on-point with his interviews.
The two points I wanted to discuss pertained to ‘tanking’ and trades.
1. Hearing that interview, in concert with other public statements made by Morey over the past few months, makes me almost positive that the decree to ‘keep a foot in both doors’ and try to rebuild while remaining competitive came down from Les. Listening to Morey, assessing his tone, I think you’d have to infer that were he to have his choice, he’d take the path of least resistance and sink to the bottom for a quicker rise to the top. He says to Simmons, regarding the ‘dual-approach’, that “it’s actually frankly never been done.” Later, while responding to Simmons’ supposition regarding avoiding the middle path, Daryl says, “we’re adding a degree of difficulty to our turnaround,” though adding “I do think it can be done.”
Before the season began, ESPN NBA Insider David Thorpe gave us five players he thought would explode on the national scene as improved, positive forces for their respective teams—young players who would see statistical spikes in production, an increase in playing time, and just a better overall understanding of how to be consistently successful in the NBA.
One of those players happened to be Houston forward Patrick Patterson, a well-coordinated cinder block of muscle, currently chugging through his second season. Before the season started, the decision to include Patterson was slightly out of left field. Thorpe reasoned his selection on the grounds that Patterson’s playing time would intensify due to the shortened season and its affect on Luis Scola’s aging legs.
Only four years ago, Kevin Garnett and the swirling, almost malevolent defense of his 2008 Boston Celtics helped make Pau Gasol look the part of a child lost in a labyrinth, keenly aware of the snarling beast that awaits at every corner, causing Gasol to tiptoe and over think just about every move until rendered ineffective. In 2012, somehow this image of Gasol remains somewhat branded into the memories of the more casual NBA viewers, those who still use the words “soft” and “European” interchangeably. For the rest of us, though, we’ve seen what the big man can do. We saw the following two Finals in which Gasol looked every bit the part of the Finals MVP, posting ridiculous numbers in both series and even dispatching Garnett himself in 2010’s seven-game bloodbath of a rematch between the Lakers and Celtics. Including his MVP-like start to the 10-11 year, Gasol has given NBA fans plenty of reasons to respect his versatility and toughness since that initial failure in Los Angeles, easily placing himself among the league’s 15 best players; given all of that validation, the Houston Rockets’ fanbase’s reluctance to accept him as a franchise player in proposed trades leaves me wondering, “Why don’t Rockets fans trust Pau Gasol?” [read more…]
Heading into the second half tonight, 34 games in, the two major themes we’re looking at are ‘sustainability’ and ‘trades.’ Sustainability has been a key factor so far this season: Sam Dalembert could not sustain his initial production and became difficult to discern from Jordan Hill. Kyle Lowry initially supplied elite production, leading many to wonder if he was amongst the game’s very best point guards. As he tapered off, it became clear that that clearly is not the case, but we do now have a sufficiently sizable sample size to conclude that he’s All-Star caliber.
The questions now are whether Parsons can sustain his defensive production and whether the team as a whole can sustain its current pace.