The difference between ‘creating’ and ‘slashing with the ball’

[NOTE: This post is intended as a supplement to 'Assessing Ariza.']

Another huge misconception that is fueling the unwarranted expectations lies within the distinction between ‘creating’ and ‘slashing.’

Most fans see instances of ‘slashing’ and either presume that it is the same thing as ‘creating’ or rather that it is indicative of the ability to ‘create’. In the minds of the average fan, it almost seems that there is an assumed ‘Battier-McGrady Dichotomy’ wherein every perimeter player is either completely rooted to the ground or has the full blown ability to create off the dribble.

This couldn’t be further from the truth.

In actuality, the abilities of players to drive with a basketball can be demarcated through a continuum ranging from Battier to McGrady at each extreme.

It’s understandable that Houston Rockets fans hold such a mistaken belief as, until Von Wafer last year, this team really hasn’t had any capable ‘slashers’ since Mario Elie. Every perimeter player has been either a standstill shooter such as Jon Barry or a full blown ‘creator’ such as Mike James, Steve Francis, and McGrady etc. There haven’t really been ‘in-betweens’ up until now.

elie The difference between ‘creating’ and ‘slashing with the ball’
Like Wafer, Trevor lies in that ‘in between’ range which characterizes ‘slashing.’ What this means is that unlike Battier, he can still drive to the basket and score. However, this is not ‘creating’ nor is it indicative of the ability to ‘create.’

When Ariza or Wafer drive to the basket, they are either attacking the defense as it rotates or they are utilizing picks set by their teammates.

There is nothing wrong with this as Trevor’s ‘slashing’ will be a huge boon for the team. However, the distinction between ‘slashing’ and ‘creating’ is not merely a matter of semantics.

It is important to identify this distinction for the purpose of reining in expectations because the same plot unfolded last year with Wafer.

Fans observed his superb slashing ability and complained aloud as to why he was never given the opportunity to create off the dribble to close out games.

A player who ‘creates’ off the dribble does not need special circumstances to weave his way to the basket. Players who merely ‘slash’ are usually using their athleticism and quickness to beat their defender after the latter is out of position.

Players who ‘create’ can face up a defender while in a standstill position and advance past him to the spot of their choice by utilizing an assortment of moves from the spin, the cross-over, to the behind the back dribble etc. In a nutshell, players who ‘create’ can go where they want, whenever they want, and however they want. They are not constrained by the positioning of the defense.

We saw what happened last year when Wafer faced up Vujacic and attempted to shake free from his defense. I hadn’t seen such complete ownage by a perimeter defender since Vernon Maxwell’s 1994 semifinals against Dan Majerle.

maxwell The difference between ‘creating’ and ‘slashing with the ball’
The sentiment is already beginning to rear its head, but I do predict that on the basis of his prolific slashes to the hoop, there will be calls to allow Trevor Ariza to close out games off the dribble. Either when it’s attempted and he proves incapable or when he isn’t even given the chance, there will be general disappointment.

I am not against giving Ariza the chance to succeed, but fans should be cognizant of his limitations and not feel disappointment when their unrealistic expectations are not met.

Posted in addenda | Tagged , , | Leave a comment | Sharethis | Permalink

The Confusion Over ‘Creating’

mcgrady3 The Confusion Over Creating[NOTE: This post is intended as a supplement to 'Assessing Ariza.']

There is a widespread assumption that a player can simply practice over the offseason and develop the ability to ‘create’ off the dribble. More than just misunderstanding the essence of this skill, this really demonstrates an overall lack of appreciation of the extreme talent level of some of the NBA’s elite wings.

This aforementioned phenomenon is most pervasive at draft time. Without fail, one can expect fans and pseudo-experts to point to any particularly raw and athletic perimeter player and apply the mistaken assumption that “he can’t really create his own shot too well off the dribble but that’s ok, he can develop that later.”

It almost never happens as planned. Richard Jefferson and Andre Iguodala are really the only two perimeter players that come to mind that developed the ability to score off the dribble after entering the league.

It is pretty obvious why this is so very rare. The fluidity required to break down an NBA level defender is something most easily attainable at a young age while overall hand-eye coordination is still in a critical period of plasticity.

A person can’t just begin practicing at age 23 and simply expect to cultivate that crucial feel for the ball and total control of his body required to break down an NBA defender.

The one counter-example always presented by subscribers to the assumption of ‘creating ability’ procurement is Houston Rockets guard Tracy McGrady. On the contrary, McGrady entered the league with ball handling as one of his primary strengths. (see 1:56 mark of video) He was starting at point guard for the Raptors by his third year. He didn’t just simply practice over the summer before joining the Magic. T-Mac already had the ability to ‘create’ his own shot but just simply was not given the opportunity to put it on display.

This is not to say that general ball handling cannot be improved. It certainly can and most players do improve in this area. But that is markedly distinct from developing the full blown ability to ‘create’.

I’m not completely ruling out the possibility that Ariza someday comes to develop the ability to ‘create’ off the dribble. There are few absolutes in sports. My point is that fans should not simply expect this ability to come as part of some natural, expected maturation process.

It’s highly, highly unlikely to occur. If it does happen for Ariza, it was something extremely out of the ordinary and should be appreciated as such.

Such a development should not just be a foregone conclusion as has been presented and as seems to be perceived by many fans.

Posted in addenda | Tagged , , | Leave a comment | Sharethis | Permalink

The difference between Tracy McGrady and Trevor Ariza

mcgrady2 The difference between Tracy McGrady and Trevor Ariza[NOTE: This post is intended as a supplement to 'Assessing Ariza.']

The media is largely culpable for the unreasonable expectations surrounding Houston Rockets guard Trevor Ariza.

Without fail, virtually every fluff piece pertaining to the acquisition made some comparison to Tracy McGrady’s emergence with Orlando.

Beyond the surface, there are very few commonalities between the two circumstances.

The premise that Ariza could make a progression similar to that of Tracy McGrady really underestimates the unique talent of the latter. McGrady didn’t just suck in Toronto, practice over the off-season, and blow up the next year. Unfortunately, this seems to be the accepted historical narrative.

McGrady entered the league with a very high skill level but did not get the opportunity to display his talents in the Raptors’ system in Vince Carter’s shadow.

Of course, McGrady did gain strength and improve his shooting and footwork with Orlando. But he already had the elite level ball handling abilities which afforded him a basic framework of capabilities through which he was able to develop a full-fledged offensive arsenal. McGrady simply needed the chance to unleash his talents.

Therein lies the difference with Ariza. Trevor has been in the league for quite some time and has never demonstrated any potential to score off the dribble. If it were ever to happen, we probably would have seen hints of it already, with Trevor now at age 24.

It’s very possible that Trevor expands certain facets of his game (as he has clearly improved his shooting), but he almost undoubtedly will never become an elite overall offensive threat.

Posted in addenda, player evaluation | Tagged , , | Leave a comment | Sharethis | Permalink

Chuck Hayes


Chuck Hayes’ duties as a Rockets co-captain along with Shane Battier have been limited. He had to answer a question about being a captain.

“I’m a captain?” he said. “I didn’t know I was. That’s news to me. Wow. I can’t remember the last time I was a captain. I guess as far as the captain is concerned, I’m more of the Robin to Shane’s Batman.”

-Houston Chronicle


Never before have I witnessed a player so hopelessly overmatched perpetually emerge so thoroughly triumphant.

Watching the Houston Rockets’ Chuck Hayes at his craft, one wonders, in some less cruel world, were he afforded that oft taken-for-granted privilege of full sizedness, wherein would his fate lie? This is a 6’6 stub portraying dominance in a time when power forwards were crafted as some superhuman race.

I should mention that Hayes possesses leaping ability paralleled in futility only by the late Matt Maloney. To consistently smother into submission men towering above him, on the strength of basic positional leveraging and fundamentality is the pinnacle of cerebral excellence. When I watch him completely suffocate an All-Star, or merely hold ground on a routine post-up, I admit that the sight never fails to evoke amazement.

It’s a shame. While he doesn’t garner anywhere near the praise and adulation of his more celebrated teammates, Hayes is undoubtedly the best defender on this team. One must wonder, were his offense not so egregiously dreadful, would the experts finally take note? Will the day come when it is finally discerned that Hayes is in fact, not the same person as Carl Landry (or the infamous “Carl Laundry” for that matter)?

Alas, I can assume he will go on unappreciated, uncredited with the plaudits he so rightfully deserves, even by fans of his own team, his sheer mastery of his craft unnoticed.

So usually goes the stinginess of appreciation of the finer subtleties of life, even if manifested throughout an 82 game season.

Posted in player evaluation | Tagged , | Leave a comment | Sharethis | Permalink

Houston Rockets 108, Golden State Warriors 107

Yes, the apathy has already sunk in. No, not the Rockets’. Don’t expect them to take even a single play off this entire year. We’re talking about my own apathy. Unfortunately, I’m pretty bored already and we’re only two games into the season.

I know I’m not alone. Watching the game last night, I had that “I guess I’ll watch but my heart isn’t exactly racing here over the outcome…wait, do I even want us to win?” feeling going on that I haven’t had since Stromile Swift still had potential.

Nothing against the Houston Rockets. They play a refreshing brand of ball that would put a smile on even Bobby Knight’s mug. I apologize, but it’s just hard to push from my mind the thought that at this time last year, we were in that glorious denial phase about Tracy McGrady’s injury and were still considered a legitimate threat to win the title. My God, what I would give for false hope and delusion right now.

As I said in my Houston Rockets season preview, what makes matters more difficult is that this team doesn’t have any high profile growth prospects. I can’t key in on one guy and tell myself, “okay, we’re going to suck, but this kid is fun to watch and…is going to take us to to the top within 5 years!” as was my in-game ritual from 1999-2002. Okay sorry, I’m ruining the fun for those of you still interested.

As is to be expected, we beat up on the utterly pathetic Warriors. They’re more talented, but they are young, undisciplined, and just overall completely suck. This is the type of team the Houston Rockets will feast on this year on their way to a range of 35-42 wins. This would probably be an appropriate time to admit that I wasn’t exactly upset when Aaron Brooks turned it over late to give the Warriors a chance. Yes, I feel a bit guilty. More on this later.

I should mention that, just two games in, I really, really like David Andersen. Yes, he might not ever become even average defensively but that’s irrelevant. He’s just a solid offensive player who I really think will be huge next year upon Yao’s return. He can shoot from the perimeter and has been showing off a very nice array of moves inside. Again, this is a 7 footer making $3million. Most 7 footers that can walk and chew gum at the same time are making at least twice that amount. I can’t begin to understand why some are actually complaining about his defense. He won’t exactly be asked to guard Dwight Howard when the games actually matter. He gives the team an option it didn’t have in the past when Yao was ineffective. The objective is to assess each part, not on the basis of its own independent merit, but in relation to the whole. The question isn’t whether he can fill Yao’s shoes or guard premiere ‘bigs.’ The question is whether he can be a legit option at the backup center position and be a reliable scoring threat off the bench. So far, it is looking very good. Another solid move by Daryl Morey.

Finally, Trevor Ariza has really been having a hard time holding onto the ball. This actually reached humorous levels last night. I’ll have more on this in-depth at a later time.

Posted in events | Tagged , , | Leave a comment | Sharethis | Permalink

  •  
  •  

  •  
  • All-time Keepers

    A collection of our best from over the years.
  •  
  • Categories

  •