Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  jorgeaam : (01 September 2014 - 04:07 AM) Probably a Parsons and a Beverley on those second rounders :P
@  feelingsuper... : (31 August 2014 - 09:31 PM) I don't mind Terry, it's a low cost gamble. I do like the 2 second rounders Morey acquired.
@  feelingsuper... : (31 August 2014 - 09:30 PM) Harden looked good once he got past the foul trouble and Coach K put the ball in his hands unlike the first half.
@  Willk : (31 August 2014 - 09:15 PM) harden 7 assists 0 TOs
@  Willk : (31 August 2014 - 09:09 PM) FSS - I do not know how to feel about that
@  feelingsuper... : (31 August 2014 - 09:01 PM) Woj reporting Kings working on deal to send Jason Terry to Rockets.
@  Buckko : (30 August 2014 - 08:17 PM) and finally an article on Canaan http://www.ridiculou...-guard#comments
@  feelingsuper... : (30 August 2014 - 03:26 PM) Just a reminder to everyone interested that Team USA plays Finland today at 2:30 central time on ESPN.
@  RollingWave : (28 August 2014 - 07:34 AM) But yeah, I can understand luxury tax / revenue sharing, but the cap's sole purpose is to help the Owner's pockets and also give jobs to all those captologist
@  RollingWave : (28 August 2014 - 07:33 AM) The irony obviously, sports being the one thing where the US is much more socialist than their European counter part ;)
@  thenit : (27 August 2014 - 08:43 PM) Unless Cle wins 2 rings in 4 years I rather have what Mia has now 2 rings and a likely playoff team
@  thenit : (27 August 2014 - 08:43 PM) That's why I don't like American sports, there shouldn't be any salary cap. It should be like Europe. Hating Socialism except for sports where the whole idea of is to compete to be the best. should be capitalistic and a free for all
@  rocketrick : (27 August 2014 - 11:53 AM) Boring...so which situation is better going forward? Miami Heat with practically no salary cap room after winning 2 titles in 3 years or Cleveland with all kinds of cap room? No wonder LeBron and KLove chose Cleveland. Just saying. NBA Salary Cap is quite onerous in the end.
@  thenit : (27 August 2014 - 02:53 AM) I think it's about right where we should be. We are a contender under the radar
@  rocketrick : (27 August 2014 - 12:42 AM) Las Vegas places 16-1 odds for the Rockets chances this season as the eventual NBA Champion. Only the Cavaliers, Bulls, Spurs, Thunder and Clippers rate better odds than the Rockets. Perhaps too much negativity this off-season in H-town???
@  rocketrick : (26 August 2014 - 11:40 PM) Troy Daniels is more of a SG, too with limited, at best, PG skills. I'm with Rolling Wave, I'd rather have Sessions than Ish Smith backing up Beverley
@  RollingWave : (26 August 2014 - 03:23 AM) Session has about 6x the career minutes of those 5 combined, of course you'd rather have him instead of Ish Smith if you could.
@  rockets best... : (26 August 2014 - 02:31 AM) Basketball Insiders is reporting the Rockets are pursuing a sign and trade for Ramon Session. with Ish, Beverly, Canaan, Nick Johnson and Troy Daniels on the roster I don't understand the move unless one of them will be in the deal and it is a larger deal than being currently reported
@  rockets best... : (25 August 2014 - 06:28 PM) so what you're saying is if Morey does this deal he's stupid? I disagree. we have a thread discussing it below. we can continue our conversation there if your wish
@  rocketrick : (25 August 2014 - 12:18 PM) Morey is not stupid so that just is not gonna happen here period so can we FINALLY just move on now? Bledsoe will sign for the agreed $3.5 million amount for this season and become an UFA next season (for his sake, I truly hope he does not blow out another knee).........

Photo

ESPN: Houston Rockets interested in acquiring Eric Gordon


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 Red94

Red94

    Senior Member

  • Administrators
  • 1,137 posts

Posted 15 February 2013 - 02:39 AM

New post: ESPN: Houston Rockets interested in acquiring Eric Gordon
  • 0

#2 Cooper

Cooper

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,178 posts

Posted 15 February 2013 - 03:26 AM

Getting Gordon would be awesome, is wonder what the price for him would be though?
  • 0

#3 Ostrow

Ostrow

    Officer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 15 February 2013 - 03:52 AM

Where would he fit? Off the bench? Harden at the 3? I'm not sure how it would work.
  • 0

#4 rockets best fan

rockets best fan

    glad you're on board, but I been on this boat since it left

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,938 posts
  • Locationhouston

Posted 15 February 2013 - 05:25 AM

I thought the idea of making a comment was so everyone could read it.........sorry but my mandrain is outdated :lol:
  • 0

you can only warn a man that the bridge is out.....if he keeps driving he's on his own B)


#5 phaketrash

phaketrash

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 891 posts
  • LocationHouston, TX

Posted 15 February 2013 - 05:58 AM

It's japanese, not mandarin lol.
  • 0

#6 phaketrash

phaketrash

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 891 posts
  • LocationHouston, TX

Posted 15 February 2013 - 06:42 AM

And I'm also quite unclear on how he'd fit on our roster. Parsons off bench w/ Harden at the 3? We could go super small ball and even have Parsons at the 4 sometimes lol. It sounds like a fun experiment that won't actually work...

We'd have a team that would not be getting great perimeter wing stops, and really just going for a SUPER version of our current offense haha. 130+ pt game averages! :P
  • 0

#7 rockets best fan

rockets best fan

    glad you're on board, but I been on this boat since it left

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,938 posts
  • Locationhouston

Posted 15 February 2013 - 06:59 AM

I like the idea. my only reservation is how much gordon stays hurt. when healthy he is clearly a star, but you can't score from the rehab room. he has not played a complete season since he entered the league. base on that stat I would say no to any deal. while we could be contenders when he's healthy he misses to much time on the court. in addition I am always scary about players who have chronic knee problems. in the nba a players knees take a pounding. if you aren't starting out with a good set chances are you won't be around long.
  • 0

you can only warn a man that the bridge is out.....if he keeps driving he's on his own B)


#8 timetodienow1234567

timetodienow1234567

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,392 posts
  • LocationAlabama

Posted 15 February 2013 - 01:34 PM

Lol. guys. Obviously Parsons is gone if we get Gordon. Come on now.
  • 0

Why so Serious? :D


#9 Steven

Steven

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,761 posts

Posted 15 February 2013 - 01:45 PM

Lol. guys. Obviously Parsons is gone if we get Gordon. Come on now.


Not necessarily, but more then likely. And it won't be till the summer anyways.
  • 0

#10 thejohnnygold

thejohnnygold

    Veteran

  • Moderators
  • 3,435 posts
  • LocationAustin, TX

Posted 15 February 2013 - 03:32 PM

I'm not sold on this at all. Gordon's only full season was the lock-out year....other than that he is injured. Add to that his shooting is Kobe-like in that he uses volume to amass numbers....he is not a good enough finisher at the rim, imo.....if he wanted to be our sixth man off the bench....I might like it, but at $13+ milliion/year I stop liking it.

So to recap: Injured, inefficient, and expensive.

Maybe in our system his numbers increase and it maximizes his skill-set better than before....but that only solves 1 of the 3 problems.

Sacramento tried it. Milwaukee keeps trying it. The Knicks tried it (and got lucky).....what is it? Amassing high volume scoring guards and thinking that is a good idea. It only ever worked once (the knicks) and they got steam-rolled in the finals once a real team showed up. We know what this team needs and it isn't another slash and shoot player.

Look at every NFL team that ignores their O and D Lines for the flashy players at RB, WR, CB, QB, etc. All losers.

Plus, we give up a lot in this trade...don't forget that. No more parsons. No more delfino. No more t. jones/D-mo. Kiss all that good bye to watch eric gordon shoot 40%...that is when he isn't rehabbing his knees.
  • 0

#11 Sir Thursday

Sir Thursday

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,019 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 15 February 2013 - 05:51 PM

As the article says, it's highly unlikely that Gordon gets moved anywhere. And in any case, all Houston have done is make an 'inquiry'. That's something active GMs (which Morey most certainly is) do as a matter of routine and has very little bearing on whether or not it's a trade that is seriously being considered. This could have just been Morey idly asking something like: "So, how's Eric Gordon working out for you?", or somesuch. Not a particularly good indicator of anything other than that Morey is doing his job.

I tend to ignore articles like this unless they actually mention concrete negotiations progressing. Otherwise it's usually just a tidbit of regular NBA business that's been blown up far out of proportion with its significance.

ST
  • 0

#12 rocketrick

rocketrick

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,744 posts

Posted 16 February 2013 - 12:21 AM

I'd rather have Parsons and his flexibility and court savvy than an often injured Gordon that can basically only play the 2, Harden's natural position.
  • 0

#13 feelingsupersonic

feelingsupersonic

    Officer

  • Moderators
  • 2,099 posts
  • LocationHouston, TX

Posted 16 February 2013 - 03:22 PM

I have to second what Sir Thursday writes. If there is one thing we know about Morey is that more often than not he keeps trades under wraps pretty well and we as fans do not get the story till after the trade goes down. The Rockets do a good job of keeping player transaction details in house. I would guess that Morey is just routinely inquiring about Gordon and might be a piece to include in a 3 team trade knowing Morey. That is my best guess.
  • 0

Not all isolation plays are equal.


#14 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 1,491 posts

Posted 16 February 2013 - 05:23 PM

It'd be hard to not be excited about having a player like Gordon on the team, at least until the first time he misses an extended amount of time due to injury. About his injury issues though, I feel he drags his recovery out based on not wanting to play for his current team. The guy hasn't played on a good team his entire career. He was a Clipper when they were struggling to win easy games, and now a Hornet while they're awful. As an NBA Player in 5 seasons, Eric Gordon's teams have accumulated only 120 wins, and never made the playoffs. If I were him I wouldn't be in any hurry to get back on the court either.

Overall, I think our team could make it work, but with that small of a front court, I'd like to see an upgrade at the 4 still prior to acquiring Gordon. Unless you can lock down the paint, I don't see how you can consistently win. It would be fun as hell to watch though.
  • 0

#15 ale11

ale11

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 673 posts
  • LocationMontevideo, Uruguay

Posted 16 February 2013 - 11:10 PM

Overall, I think our team could make it work, but with that small of a front court, I'd like to see an upgrade at the 4 still prior to acquiring Gordon.


Precisely. We have other priorities right now....I mean, having two All-Star caliber (talentwise) shooting guards but no real back-up at center, or not having a reliable rebounder at power forward or a composed point guard to play back-up....It would be cool to see him here, We would be making about 372 points per game ( :P) but that's not exactly an upgrade from what we have now, we are already scoring more points than most teams, we need to fill in the blanks to get better, not superimpose talent at the same position.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users