Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  slick shoes : (28 April 2017 - 04:53 PM) Wow, Larry Bird steps down as president of the Pacers. What a dumpster fire that organization is.
@  thejohnnygold : (27 April 2017 - 08:50 PM) I think Steph Curry and Kevin Durant would both say, "yes". That is largely how they got their MVP's
@  rocketrick : (27 April 2017 - 02:48 PM) So should MVP consideration also be based on Efficiency and not just DD's and TD's?
@  rocketrick : (27 April 2017 - 02:47 PM) Looking Forward to Round 2, Western Conf Semi-Finals, Most Likely vs. Spurs.
@  thejohnnygold : (23 April 2017 - 10:20 PM) "Pheeeeew!" --(Every Rockets fan today)
@  rocketrick : (20 April 2017 - 04:28 PM) Incredible Atmosphere at Toyota Center last night! Rockets are for Real people.....
@  thejohnnygold : (17 April 2017 - 12:47 PM) The defense was there too. All in all, a good win.
@  Mario Peña : (17 April 2017 - 04:08 AM) I like that effort on the boards tonight and second chance points tonight. I hope they can finish OKC in 5 or less.
@  DenverRocket : (05 April 2017 - 07:15 PM) Give me a shout and if I'm around, I'll be happy to honor my commitment!
@  slick shoes : (05 April 2017 - 06:34 PM) I'll be in Denver Memorial Day weekend and Labor Day weekend ;)
@  DenverRocket : (05 April 2017 - 04:52 PM) Oh and congrats to @SlickShoes on winning the bracket challenge handily :) If I ever meet you, I'll buy you a beer!
@  DenverRocket : (04 April 2017 - 06:23 PM) Worth a read, Who's The Best Bargain in the NBA: http://www.espn.com/...nd-best-bargain
@  thejohnnygold : (31 March 2017 - 04:19 PM) Probably...mine's toast.
@  slick shoes : (31 March 2017 - 02:12 PM) Is it safe to assume I have taken the bracket challenge??
@  thejohnnygold : (15 March 2017 - 12:58 PM) I'm in!
@  DenverRocket : (15 March 2017 - 02:12 AM) You can join my not knowing anything club! :-)
@  slick shoes : (15 March 2017 - 01:34 AM) I filled one out. I don't know anything about college ball so everything was gut feel. wish me luck!
@  DenverRocket : (15 March 2017 - 12:06 AM) If anyone is interested in joining a Red94 bracket challenge, I've set one up here: http://games.espn.co...groupID=1517203
@  slick shoes : (14 March 2017 - 02:48 PM) As much fun as it is to watch the Warriors lose, I'm gonna need them to go ahead and take 1st place again so that we can potentially avoid them until the WCF.
@  SadLakerFan : (13 March 2017 - 02:24 PM) My Lakers coming into town. Hope Bev can cover our SG of the future David Nwaba. He's lighting it up.

Photo

Danny Granger?


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1 timetodienow1234567

timetodienow1234567

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,598 posts
  • LocationAlabama

Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:22 PM

It seems like the Rockets are having talks with the Pacers about acquiring Granger. They would have to give up quite a few guys to get the salaries to match. What do you guys think? Having a starting 5 of Lin/Harden/Granger/PPat/Asik would be an upgrade but we'd lose some depth.
  • 0

Why so Serious? :D


#2 Rahat Huq

Rahat Huq

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 1,597 posts

Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:07 PM

link?
  • 0

#3 sircharles

sircharles

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 283 posts
  • LocationAustin Tx

Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:18 PM

http://www.foxsports...721&feedID=3725

thats the only link i found, and that was via hoopshype.


since the rockets are well below the salary cap they wouldnt HAVE to give up the equivelant to granger as far as salary goes, they can afford to take on a big contract and give up less.
  • 0

#4 thejohnnygold

thejohnnygold

    Veteran

  • Moderators
  • 4,810 posts
  • LocationAustin, TX

Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:28 PM

It really depends on who we part with....we don't know how his knee is going to be moving forward. Will he be as mobile? He's 29 with a bum knee....I would need to feel really good about that first. If the knee is bad he is just a spot-up 3-pt shooter that would be way-overpaid. We already have a good one in Delfino for $3 million.
  • 0

#5 sircharles

sircharles

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 283 posts
  • LocationAustin Tx

Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:51 PM

im with jonnygold. i like granger but if he cant stay healthy he is no good to us. IF he is healthy id gladly take him, he would make us a lot better. His fg% has been dropping yearly but its still pretty high and he can score from anywhere. He also isnt very good on the defensive end so that would be a con. Decent rebounder. i dunno, i still like him and that would make it so he couldnt torch the rockets anymore(which he always does)
  • 0

#6 Red94

Red94

    Senior Member

  • Administrators
  • 1,547 posts

Posted 05 February 2013 - 02:57 AM

New post: On the Danny Granger report
  • 0

#7 thejohnnygold

thejohnnygold

    Veteran

  • Moderators
  • 4,810 posts
  • LocationAustin, TX

Posted 05 February 2013 - 03:42 AM

Rahat, your point is well stated that acquiring Granger wouldn't cost much (Morey wouldn't do it if it did) and times out well for future free agency flexibility. Yet, I am very apprehensive as Granger plays SF--a position we are fairly comfortable with at the moment. Parsons obviously is entrenched as the starter for the foreseeable future. Delfino is more efficient as a 3-pt. threat and comfortable with his role as the back-up/specialist.

Granger's numbers have steadily declined over the past few seasons and now he carries the burden of a surgically repaired knee. Personally, I do not see the advantage of acquiring him unless we can sneak Ian Mahinmi into the deal....He is buried behind Hibbert on the depth chart, but at 6' 11" and 230 lbs that lithe frame could serve as an excellent weakside defender at the PF and receiver of easy lob pass dunks when Harden/Lin drive as well as an upgrade at back-up center over Aldrich. He has 4 years left on his contract in the $4 million range--not bad at all if he ends up being useful.
  • 0

#8 rockets best fan

rockets best fan

    glad you're on board, but I been on this boat since it left

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,299 posts
  • Locationhouston

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:25 AM

danny granger...............NOOOOOOOOOOO! even though granger has had the reputation of a star for the last few years he has never appeared dominant to me(especially playing in the east aka least comf.). he (IMO) is not enough of an upgrade over parson for us to pursue him. he shoots a little better, but his defense is a couple of levels below parsons. unless we can get him for royce white I would pass. he simply doesn't bring enough to the table (IMO).
  • 0

My new years resolution.....drink that special bottle of wine, take your son on that fishing trip, live each day as if it were my last because everyday of LIFE is special B)


#9 phaketrash

phaketrash

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 891 posts
  • LocationHouston, TX

Posted 05 February 2013 - 01:45 PM

I've always liked the rental idea as much as (maybe more than?) the staying pat w/ salary cap idea, and both those ideas beat out giving up our 2014/2015 flexibility for JSmoove or the like. This fits in the Pau strategy, as Rahat mentioned, but seems to bring a little less to our team (for a little less $).

Would Parsons be our 6th man off the bench? If the season weren't already over half done, he'd give Crawford and co. a run for best 6th man money :P Would he spend some time at the 4 and bulk up? Both?

Not as hot on this trade now since I see it do what a move for Pau would, but for much less. SF is great already, Granger doesn't add anything to our team but $$$. At least Pau added a post game and upgrade at the 4. Of course, Pau would not be a cheap trade. If we got Granger for Delfino, 2Pat/MM, +expiring, would you do it? How about if we threw in one of TJones/DMo?
  • 0

#10 timetodienow1234567

timetodienow1234567

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,598 posts
  • LocationAlabama

Posted 05 February 2013 - 02:05 PM

Granger > Parsons. I know Parsons is great dollar for dollar, but don't kid yourself that he's as good as Granger. He's getting better, though. But for this season and probably next season, Granger is a better player than Parsons. I like Parsons a lot and hope that we keep him, but I think you're overvaluing him a tad.
  • 0

Why so Serious? :D


#11 Alituro

Alituro

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 549 posts

Posted 05 February 2013 - 02:11 PM

2 or 3 years ago I would have jumped on an opportunity to get Granger. Now, with Harden on board and the emergence of Asik, and the surprise, outstanding development of Parsons, I'd pass, even if just for a rental. I don't buy into, well, we have it, might as well spend it. Granger would handicap us defensively too much IMO, where we're already in the bottom of the league anyway. The choices here are a 29 year old former all star on the decline or a second year guy continually on the up and up. With the current situation we're in I'm taking the latter, if we were trying to win it all this year, then the former.
  • 0

#12 Mario Peña

Mario Peña

    Officer

  • Moderators
  • 2,379 posts
  • LocationHouston, TX

Posted 05 February 2013 - 02:12 PM

You are right timetodie in these parts Parsons gets a little overvalued and Granger is definitely better than Parsons for now. Saying all that within the context of the situation I am not convinced adding Granger is in the teams best interest long term. Sure in a vacuum Granger is better than Parsons and it's not even close but in reality Parsons is the better fit for this team in the short term and long term, just my two cents.
  • 0

#13 timetodienow1234567

timetodienow1234567

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,598 posts
  • LocationAlabama

Posted 05 February 2013 - 02:24 PM

I agree feelingsupersonic, it's a risk with Granger's injuries. But we need to cash in on Parsons soon unless you think he can get good enough to shut down KD/LBJ/Melo? He's not a bad player and he could be a good role player on a championship team, but I just don't see superstar potential there. I think he can grow into a 2 or 3-time all star down the road if he continues to improve. I just don't see him as one of the core guys to win a championship. I do think Pau could really help us, but with his price tag of 19 mil it's not worth it to give up so much in assets for him. Granger would help us, but I don't think he makes us a championship contender, so it's probably better to stay put. But we SHOULD make at least a few moves. We have several expiring contracts, Cole Aldrich, Toney Douglas, Delfino(although I hope we keep him). We could get back a decent player for teams doing a salary dump since we also have several million in cap space.
  • 0

Why so Serious? :D


#14 Rahat Huq

Rahat Huq

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 1,597 posts

Posted 05 February 2013 - 02:27 PM

phaketrash: I agree in preferring Pau. But not sure that is feasible.
  • 0

#15 thejohnnygold

thejohnnygold

    Veteran

  • Moderators
  • 4,810 posts
  • LocationAustin, TX

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:12 PM

Also, remember this: if we bring in a veteran at SF or PF it will stunt the growth and evaluation of the players we are developing. To me that is a high cost for little gain. Very few players come into the league and just start lighting it up. Year 3 is when you really know what you've got and most of the roster is under that benchmark.
  • 0

#16 sircharles

sircharles

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 283 posts
  • LocationAustin Tx

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:32 PM

then what should we use our cap space to upgrade? if we dont want to stunt the growth of our 3 and 4.....
  • 0

#17 thejohnnygold

thejohnnygold

    Veteran

  • Moderators
  • 4,810 posts
  • LocationAustin, TX

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:43 PM

Well, I like the idea of a strong defensive SG a la Courtney Lee. I am not sold on any of our back-up PG's yet. We also don't have a great back-up center. There are a lot of young, athletic bigs out there right now on mediocre teams....one of them might be willing to ship one out if they don't fit their philosophy/scheme.
  • 0

#18 rockets best fan

rockets best fan

    glad you're on board, but I been on this boat since it left

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,299 posts
  • Locationhouston

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:56 PM

then what should we use our cap space to upgrade? if we dont want to stunt the growth of our 3 and 4.....

just because we have cap space doesn't mean we should be in a rush to spend it. nothing that is available right now is enough of an upgrade for us to lock ourselfs in for the next couple of years. both j smith or milsap can be had at seasons end without giving up any assets. if I was going to pursue someone I would go after bledsoe from the clippers. we need help at point guard. since it appears the clippers may listen to offers for him he would be an upgrade at a position we need and fitts in with our long term growth. I am against bringing in any old past their prime washed up vets for short term help. I don't want a bandaid. we need to continue the youth movement.
  • 0

My new years resolution.....drink that special bottle of wine, take your son on that fishing trip, live each day as if it were my last because everyday of LIFE is special B)


#19 Mario Peña

Mario Peña

    Officer

  • Moderators
  • 2,379 posts
  • LocationHouston, TX

Posted 05 February 2013 - 05:09 PM

I kind of share some similar views to you rockets best fan though I wouldn't call Gasol a washed up veteran. Although like Rahat already stated I don't believe a Gasol trade is feasible. I would love to get Bledsoe in a Rockets uniform and can only imagine what some Harden/Bledsoe versus Durant/Westbrook matchups would be like.

Back to the original point of this topic, I don't think most of us like Granger for the Rockets and in reality this trade probably won't happen right. I think another team will give up more than Morey is willing to part with.
  • 0

#20 thejohnnygold

thejohnnygold

    Veteran

  • Moderators
  • 4,810 posts
  • LocationAustin, TX

Posted 05 February 2013 - 05:13 PM

then what should we use our cap space to upgrade? if we dont want to stunt the growth of our 3 and 4.....

Well, I like the idea of a strong defensive SG a la Courtney Lee. I am not sold on any of our back-up PG's yet. We also don't have a great back-up center. There are a lot of young, athletic bigs out there right now on mediocre teams....one of them might be willing to ship one out if they don't fit their philosophy/scheme.


a list of young centers I would like to pry from other teams:
Larry Sanders
Andre Drummond
Greg monroe
Ian Mahinmi
Trey Thompkins
JJ Hickson

We can pick up a veteran PG to back up the starter once we get closer to contention--presuming we haven't developed one from within.

James Anderson is not going to be a defensive star at the 2 for us...I still like him as an offensive threat assuming he figures it out, but would also like to get a 2 that can play alongside Lin/Harden and shut down his guy for 5-10 minutes at a time. Not sure who that is....Royal Ivey (ex-longhorn) has made a career out of that specialty.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users