Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  RollingWave : (28 August 2014 - 07:34 AM) But yeah, I can understand luxury tax / revenue sharing, but the cap's sole purpose is to help the Owner's pockets and also give jobs to all those captologist
@  RollingWave : (28 August 2014 - 07:33 AM) The irony obviously, sports being the one thing where the US is much more socialist than their European counter part ;)
@  thenit : (27 August 2014 - 08:43 PM) Unless Cle wins 2 rings in 4 years I rather have what Mia has now 2 rings and a likely playoff team
@  thenit : (27 August 2014 - 08:43 PM) That's why I don't like American sports, there shouldn't be any salary cap. It should be like Europe. Hating Socialism except for sports where the whole idea of is to compete to be the best. should be capitalistic and a free for all
@  rocketrick : (27 August 2014 - 11:53 AM) Boring...so which situation is better going forward? Miami Heat with practically no salary cap room after winning 2 titles in 3 years or Cleveland with all kinds of cap room? No wonder LeBron and KLove chose Cleveland. Just saying. NBA Salary Cap is quite onerous in the end.
@  thenit : (27 August 2014 - 02:53 AM) I think it's about right where we should be. We are a contender under the radar
@  rocketrick : (27 August 2014 - 12:42 AM) Las Vegas places 16-1 odds for the Rockets chances this season as the eventual NBA Champion. Only the Cavaliers, Bulls, Spurs, Thunder and Clippers rate better odds than the Rockets. Perhaps too much negativity this off-season in H-town???
@  rocketrick : (26 August 2014 - 11:40 PM) Troy Daniels is more of a SG, too with limited, at best, PG skills. I'm with Rolling Wave, I'd rather have Sessions than Ish Smith backing up Beverley
@  RollingWave : (26 August 2014 - 03:23 AM) Session has about 6x the career minutes of those 5 combined, of course you'd rather have him instead of Ish Smith if you could.
@  rockets best... : (26 August 2014 - 02:31 AM) Basketball Insiders is reporting the Rockets are pursuing a sign and trade for Ramon Session. with Ish, Beverly, Canaan, Nick Johnson and Troy Daniels on the roster I don't understand the move unless one of them will be in the deal and it is a larger deal than being currently reported
@  rockets best... : (25 August 2014 - 06:28 PM) so what you're saying is if Morey does this deal he's stupid? I disagree. we have a thread discussing it below. we can continue our conversation there if your wish
@  rocketrick : (25 August 2014 - 12:18 PM) Morey is not stupid so that just is not gonna happen here period so can we FINALLY just move on now? Bledsoe will sign for the agreed $3.5 million amount for this season and become an UFA next season (for his sake, I truly hope he does not blow out another knee).........
@  rocketrick : (25 August 2014 - 12:16 PM) This is quite frustrating as an avid NBA fan......Bledsoe CLEARLY wants a Max Deal whether that be with Phoenix (impossible in my opinion) or one of the other teams.
@  2016Champions : (25 August 2014 - 12:30 AM) According to Cyberx, Morey wants Bledsoe on a 2 year deal but Bledsoe wants more stability than that.
@  Buckko : (22 August 2014 - 03:31 AM) A logical article from B/R http://bleacherrepor...ext-year/page/6 I'm shocked.
@  Johnny Rocket : (21 August 2014 - 03:20 AM) Thanks for the great links, Buckko!
@  txtdo1411 : (20 August 2014 - 10:13 PM) Bledsoe scares me because of the injuries... that being said it is still probably the right move.
@  jorgeaam : (20 August 2014 - 10:09 PM) Let's go Morey!
@  jorgeaam : (20 August 2014 - 10:09 PM) The Suns are now discussing trade possibilities for restricted free agent Eric Bledsoe, according to Jude LaCava of FOX Phoenix.
@  thejohnnygold : (20 August 2014 - 04:52 AM) That article is a nice change of pace :)

Photo

Can the Rockets afford to be picky?


  • Please log in to reply
61 replies to this topic

#1 Red94

Red94

    Senior Member

  • Administrators
  • 1,137 posts

Posted 08 January 2013 - 05:27 AM

New post: Can the Rockets afford to be picky?
  • 0

#2 tombrokeoff

tombrokeoff

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 590 posts
  • LocationHouston

Posted 08 January 2013 - 05:48 AM

I'd be picky for at least a year. Morey has worked had to clear the roster of dead cap space and finally land 1 star. I don't want him to haphazardly wreck what he's worked so hard to achieve. I guess nothing is a sure bet, but I'd prefer less risk. Then again Morey has gotten himself out of bad contracts like Ariza, so idk.
  • 0

#3 Furters

Furters

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 08 January 2013 - 06:00 AM

I think that we have built such a good unit that it would be a little silly now to destroy everything now to get someone who MIGHT work out. Cousins (for example) might be great, but he could be poison too. For someone like him, I can see the Rockets having to give up at least 2 of Asik, Parsons and Patterson/Morris. For me, free agency would be a much more viable first option.
  • 0

#4 el35

el35

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 08 January 2013 - 06:54 AM

I think what Morey meant is that, so long as the player is categorised a foundational in his book, then he is going to go get him no matter what position he plays. I very much doubt Josh Smith is in that class. Cousins, probably, and I think Morey will get after him if the Kings ever puts him on the market.
  • 0

#5 goRockets

goRockets

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 30 posts

Posted 08 January 2013 - 08:14 AM

If this is really a rebuilding year and the young Rockets are already doing quite well, I'd say let this core develop and see what they can become. Yes signing another superstar on paper will help you, but on the other hand it could be bringing in another ego into the mix that you'll have to deal with, and that super star may or may not be a good fit (skills wise and personality wise) with the team you already have. If I'm Morey I'd be very careful signing another player to a max contract, don't do it just because you have the cap room, because once it's done, you're stuck with it. Just look at Knicks, their big 3 contract for Melo, Amare and Tyson literally handcuffed their ability to sign or keep other young talents, like Lin. Another thing is I'm pretty sure if Asik and Lin continue to play better, their market value after 3 years will be much higher than what Rockets are paying them now, so Morey better leave enough cap to chase these players if he wants to keep them in Houston for the long term, and build a dynasty like the Spurs. I know that's long ways ahead, but 3 years goes by very quickly, he should also think about where he sees the team going in the long term also, and strategize not just based on short term return, especially when the West is so competitive, you really cannot afford to make too many mistakes signing ineffective personnel.
  • 1

#6 redfaithful

redfaithful

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 160 posts
  • LocationIsrael

Posted 08 January 2013 - 08:59 AM

Parsons' best-value-for-money in-league deal expires the same time as Lin and Asik's, making that summer even more of a challenge. On the other hand, the new CBA will be in full impact, so I presume all teams will be more hesitant to sign large deals with anyone not at the superstar level.
  • 0

#7 rockets best fan

rockets best fan

    glad you're on board, but I been on this boat since it left

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,938 posts
  • Locationhouston

Posted 08 January 2013 - 09:24 AM

picky.......yeah we have put ourselfs in a position to be picky. the players we want must be be a superstar. josh smith just doesn't do it for me, neither does milsap, or big al. we need a player who other teams game plan for. only 2 players available fit the bill (IMO). rudy gay and cousins. rudy's contract is the problem in his case. cousins on the other hand is still in his rookie contract. yeah we can be picky just make sure we pick the right one. either (IMO) can take the rockets to the next level.
  • 0

you can only warn a man that the bridge is out.....if he keeps driving he's on his own B)


#8 amacbrooks12

amacbrooks12

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 161 posts
  • LocationBronx, New York

Posted 08 January 2013 - 12:43 PM

v
  • 0

#9 amacbrooks12

amacbrooks12

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 161 posts
  • LocationBronx, New York

Posted 08 January 2013 - 12:45 PM

There's no point in going after Rudy Gay when we already have a superstar that has the ball in his hands 90% of the time. Not to mention we have Jeremy Lin who needs the ball as well to even be effective. I just don't see how Rudy Gay can help us when he'll barely touch the ball on this team. Our focus should be a game changing PF that knows he'll be the second option running pick and rolls with Harden and Lin.
  • 0

#10 Rahat Huq

Rahat Huq

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 1,540 posts

Posted 08 January 2013 - 12:56 PM

regarding rudy gay: that's dumpster diving, the complete opposite of being picky. that would be a huge mistake to commit 15mill to gay when the team already has enough problems getting jeremy lin enough touches.
  • 0

#11 timetodienow1234567

timetodienow1234567

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,392 posts
  • LocationAlabama

Posted 08 January 2013 - 02:01 PM

Why don't they just improve bit by bit? I'd like them to trade for Jimmer Fredette. While not great, he would fit this offense and we need a backup PG/SG with no real person to play behind Harden/Lin. The Kings have a plethora of guards so he might be cheap. What do you all think?
  • 0

Why so Serious? :D


#12 Alituro

Alituro

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 434 posts

Posted 08 January 2013 - 02:10 PM

I think the key question on this issue is: Who is Harden tight with? After a season playing here, establishing himself as a superstar, and the Rockets proving they've got an exciting young core, what kind of talent can Harden convince to come over? This seems to have worked on BOS, MIA, NYK, and LAL in the past, why not Rockets? Did OKC extend Ibaka's contract? Who, on the Olympic squad could potentially be available? As stated below, there's always the fear of a clash of egos if another star is brought here, why not build on an already established camaraderie? Except for Cousins who is still just a maybe, IMO, everyone else mentioned on this thread, I would consider NOs.
  • 0

#13 timetodienow1234567

timetodienow1234567

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,392 posts
  • LocationAlabama

Posted 08 January 2013 - 02:13 PM

I think the key question on this issue is: Who is Harden tight with? After a season playing here, establishing himself as a superstar, and the Rockets proving they've got an exciting young core, what kind of talent can Harden convince to come over? This seems to have worked on BOS, MIA, NYK, and LAL in the past, why not Rockets? Did OKC extend Ibaka's contract? Who, on the Olympic squad could potentially be available? As stated below, there's always the fear of a clash of egos if another star is brought here, why not build on an already established camaraderie? Except for Cousins who is still just a maybe, IMO, everyone else mentioned on this thread, I would consider NOs.


What do you think of Fredette as a backup role player? They probably would only have to give up a 2nd round pick or someone of that calibre.
  • 0

Why so Serious? :D


#14 amacbrooks12

amacbrooks12

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 161 posts
  • LocationBronx, New York

Posted 08 January 2013 - 02:29 PM

v
  • 0

#15 amacbrooks12

amacbrooks12

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 161 posts
  • LocationBronx, New York

Posted 08 January 2013 - 02:35 PM

If were going to improve bit by bit, we should take baby steps and start with the bench. Espn rumors have JJ Reddick on the block and IMO he can produce more than Jimmer can. He can score points in a hurry, has a lethal 3 point shot, and can even put the ball on the floor to create another shot. Reddick would be a perfect fit for this up tempo team that likes to run fast breaks all day and jack up threes .. he would be more than a decent backup for Harden.
  • 0

#16 timetodienow1234567

timetodienow1234567

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,392 posts
  • LocationAlabama

Posted 08 January 2013 - 02:41 PM

If were going to improve bit by bit, we should take baby steps and start with the bench. Espn rumors have JJ Reddick on the block and IMO he can produce more than Jimmer can. He can score points in a hurry, has a lethal 3 point shot, and can even put the ball on the floor to create another shot. Reddick would be a perfect fit for this up tempo team that likes to run fast breaks all day and jack up threes .. he would be more than a decent backup for Harden.


I agree, but Reddick makes quite a bit more than Jimmer and will command quite a bit more when he becomes a free agent. Since he's a GREAT role player and an expiring contract at 6 mil his price tag will be enormous. Jimmer's won't be as high plus he's young and is under contract for the next few years. But I would love Reddick but don't think he's available without giving up Parsons or some 1st round picks. He's definitely not worth that for this team.
  • 0

Why so Serious? :D


#17 cdhthegreat

cdhthegreat

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 14 posts

Posted 08 January 2013 - 02:41 PM

I believe you can be picky to an extent. You can look at fit and price instead of making a mad dash at any "superstar" to hit the market. You don't have to throw max money at Smith for example (poor fit) but I'd consider throwing a large amount at Big Al (great fit next to Asik), Howard, and CP3. If you wait a year, signing Lebron becomes possible (which would be amazing).

No need to compromise what you've built to make a splash signing (or trade for that matter). I'm sure Morey's assessment has changed a ton since the season has started to take shape.
  • 0

#18 Kade

Kade

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 223 posts

Posted 08 January 2013 - 03:15 PM

I think the key question on this issue is: Who is Harden tight with? After a season playing here, establishing himself as a superstar, and the Rockets proving they've got an exciting young core, what kind of talent can Harden convince to come over? This seems to have worked on BOS, MIA, NYK, and LAL in the past, why not Rockets? Did OKC extend Ibaka's contract? Who, on the Olympic squad could potentially be available? As stated below, there's always the fear of a clash of egos if another star is brought here, why not build on an already established camaraderie? Except for Cousins who is still just a maybe, IMO, everyone else mentioned on this thread, I would consider NOs.


No superstar is ever going to bypass BOS/MIA/NYC/LA and play for Houston, would you?
  • 0

#19 Alituro

Alituro

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 434 posts

Posted 08 January 2013 - 03:38 PM

No superstar is ever going to bypass BOS/MIA/NYC/LA and play for Houston, would you?

Maybe not, but there are plenty of stars on teams in cities way less desirable than Houston at the same time, and they may not be getting looks form those cities.. It's not like we're the Bobcats, Hornets or Kings. The opportunity to play with guys like Harden, Asik and Lin would be the allure more than the city.

I don't think role players are what we're talking about. Anyway what does Fredette bring that Douglas doesn't? Nothing IMO.
  • 0

#20 hubeijames

hubeijames

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts

Posted 08 January 2013 - 03:40 PM

"We can't afford to be picky" was said back when smart money was that this would still be a .500 or under team, even after the Harden trade. A lot has changed since then.

I think with the success we're seeing Morey is less likely to take big risks than before. There is no reason to throw away assets or spoil the team's chemistry with a big trade when we're poised to make the play-offs and enter the off-season with max cap space. We'll make a play for a big free agent then (Morey seems to be good at that); trading will still be around if we can't get anyone.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users