The Emerging Chandler Parsons
Posted 21 December 2012 - 05:58 PM
OTOH,anyone would have 100 out of a 100 times traded for a player you KNEW was going to be a star vs a player you HOPED might become one.
More and more I'm becoming convinces Parsons' comparable is not an improved Battier,but a taller Robert Reid. For those who are too young to know/remember Bobby Jo,he was a SF/SG who was never quite a star,but could do almost everything well-just not great. He defended,scored,rebounded,was a good enough passer that he was used as the PG at times,ran the court and was a team leader.
Posted 22 December 2012 - 10:52 AM
Posted 24 December 2012 - 06:41 AM
My new years resolution.....drink that special bottle of wine, take your son on that fishing trip, live each day as if it were my last because everyday of LIFE is special
Posted 02 January 2013 - 09:41 PM
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:13 PM
But wouldn't that sort of limit us to small ball? I know that seems to be sort of getting "in" these days in the NBA, and seems conducive to our fast pace...and our numbers are a lot better w/ Parsons at the '4'...yet I still have my hesitations. I guess it depends on what pieces we keep so we'll know what sort of flexibility we may have in our rotations lol.
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:27 PM
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:35 PM
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:38 PM
I think Chandler at the 4 is a great option in stretches, as the numbers show, but they will still need a long-term 4.
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:57 PM
I've heard of having Iggy at the 3 and Parsons at the 4 before, which sounded interesting (he's an FA in 2014 I believe)...though I remain skeptical that a Lin/Harden/Iguodala/Parsons/Asik core can be a true NBA contender.
Posted 03 January 2013 - 12:32 AM
3. Chandler Parsons, Rockets
Parsons gets the award for the most unlikely guy to appear so high on this list. For three years at Florida, he mostly slept-walked through games relative to his talent. But winning player of the year in the SEC as a senior proved to him that he could excel in a league of athletes, and he has not slowed down since. Parsons had an impressive rookie campaign, and he is better basically everywhere on the floor now for the fast-paced Rockets. Parsons often plays like a shutdown wing defender, but he is not yet strong enough to do it nightly. His ability and size allows him to excel often as a power forward and his improved free throw shooting, willingness to move the ball and good ball-handling for someone so tall makes him a real plus on the offensive end. These skills and physical talents combine into a long-time NBA starter.
Posted 03 January 2013 - 03:07 AM
Given these positions, Rockets could go for the likes of a '3-point Rebounder', 'Scoring Rebounder', or 'Scoring Paint Protector' a la Ersan Ilyasova ('07-'08 Troy Murphy would be nice), Paul Millsap, or our favorite Cousins, respectively. However, I don't mind playing wait and see for what Jones and Motiejunas could bring to the table given minutes like Morris did this year. Then again, we only have a 3ish year window and don't want to mess up championship aspirations this time around.
Posted 03 January 2013 - 05:00 AM
As the case in tonight's game, putting Patterson at the 5 and taking Asik out (who it should be noted tied a career high 21-points), was a situational decision--McHale needed someone who could close out on Jason Smith/Ryan Anderson's shooting. The plus-minus for Patterson playing center over those minutes is ridiculously good, but it was dependent on him being able to abuse the matchup.
Putting that in the context of Chandler's 54 as a PF, I would say it is probably as much the result of McHale exploiting the matchup on the floor in any particular game as it is the result of Parsons' individual skillset.
Posted 03 January 2013 - 05:47 AM
It's a little crazy, but I like it for every team involved.
This is based on Parsons' ability to play the 3 & the 4 while developing the PF's we keep.
Posted 03 January 2013 - 02:53 PM
Posted 03 January 2013 - 03:22 PM
Parsons has that intuition. Morris may have it but the sample size is still a little small. Someone posted a link to a blog a few weeks backed highlighting Greg Smith's production and on the same page had a list of players that have the most negative impact on their teams. Patterson was on the list. I wonder if the signing of James Anderson is an omen of things to come at the PF position. Anderson being able to play either wing spot and has the potential to be a starter in this league. D-Mo is an excellent offensive player too, and from what I've seen can grab some rebounds, I'd like to see him getting some burn. He's also a much better shooter than either Morris or Patterson. Going big with D-mo and Asik holding down the post will be fun to watch one day.
Posted 03 January 2013 - 03:25 PM
thejohnnygold: Do you really see Boston trading Rondo right now? Really? I don´t mind letting PPat and Delfino go, but I´m not Smith´s biggest fan anyway...
I do. He is a volatile player and presence in the organization. I think If you can turn him into a near equally efffective PG AND a stud center you do it. I think Kevin Garnett is one of the few people in this league that Cousins would respect and listen to. It gives Boston a huge leg up in the East.
I see your point and I do agree that if anyone kills this deal it's Boston. But it's still the NBA and rule #1 for them is you can't coach size. Look at every year's draft and you will see they still think this way.
Posted 03 January 2013 - 03:34 PM
Don't get me wrong....I like our team and would like to see them stay together, grow, and succeed. I was just having a bit of fun with the trade machine in response to a post I read about Parsons' success at the 4 and updating the 3 position instead. In regards to that, I like the trade and really, we are only giving up T. Jones' potential, C. Delfino, and PPat which we all seem to agree is not the best of the bunch--just a solid reserve. It may be a blockbuster trade for the other teams, but for us I think it's just a little refining...or a finishing touch. We give up the least in the deal.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users