Toggle shoutbox
Shoutbox
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retrospective: Were Morey's failed deals blessings in disguise?
#1
Posted 13 December 2012 - 04:16 PM
My thoughts are no, we'd probably have a similar win total at this point, but the future would be more bleak. On the former situation, well, Gasol is injured and, IMO, Asik has proved to be as good or better than Nene. On the latter, Dwight Howard hasn't impressed me as a Laker, and I fear he would even less so as a Rocket if unhappy to be here. We would have had to blow up our future by giving up promising rookies and sophomores and draft picks to get him leaving us, at this point in the season with a skeleton crew of a supporting cast for Howard.
Although we knew OKC probably wouldn't be holding onto Harden, we couldn't foresee them trading him within the same conference so early on in the season. That trade worked out well for both teams. I think Harden has a longer and more promising future than either of the stars we pursued in his stead. i think Asik will be one of the best centers in the league in a couple years and we all know the potential Lin has if he were to just get more consistent. Parsons and Patterson are both developing quite nicely too.
I like where we are now with the rising stars and the cap room and trade flexibility to still be able to pursue another star to add to the mix. I don't think our future would have looked quite as promising had either trade went down.
#2
Posted 13 December 2012 - 04:43 PM
So since the current Rockets situation seems like a move in the right direction I wonder what all the Morey detractors are thinking. I have always thought that Morey has been good at what he does.
The 2013 Red94 Fantasy Basketball League Champion
#3
Posted 13 December 2012 - 05:40 PM
It goes to show that when our roster was blown up and Tmac and Yao were of no use any more, us diehard fans wanted something back and desperately! Anything! Patience prevailed.
#4
Posted 13 December 2012 - 05:56 PM
Of all the deals sans Harden I really think that the Lowry, Nene, and Gasol trio would have been an excellent team. Lowry and Lee hitting threes and playing D with Nene and Gasol on the block would have been a serious contender. But we would be talking about who will be Gasol's replacement right now, just one year after the trade. And that is a scary thought.
#5
Posted 13 December 2012 - 05:59 PM
The 2013 Red94 Fantasy Basketball League Champion
#6
Posted 13 December 2012 - 06:47 PM
I think the jury is still out on Howard and he probably won't be back to his top form till next year. Back injury takes a long time to recover from. Also from a lot of commentators and former players you generally hear good things about his work ethic in the gym and he seems to have improved his game offensively over the years especially after the off season he trained with Olajuwon. I believe the court of public opinion is a bit hasty these days and once Howard gets his championship fans will come to their senses.
I agree with this. Because the Lakers have not started well, Howard is being unfairly judged. And the Lakers have not started well because of injuries and unfamiliarity, both of which will improve over time. Remember when the Heat started out 8-9 back in 2010? Same deal here, as far as I'm concerned, and once that rights itself the narrative on Howard will improve (especially as he continues to recouperate after his surgery).
The thing about that, though, that he would only have had one year in Houston to decide whether he liked it here. And if that season is clouded by recovering from surgery, then he would have been less likely to remember it fondly enough to sign a new contract here. The public are judging Howard too early at the moment, but were he in Houston any judging at this stage would probably be justified given there's a good chance he would be out of here by the trade deadline.
ST
#7
Posted 13 December 2012 - 07:15 PM
#8
Posted 13 December 2012 - 07:57 PM
The 2013 Red94 Fantasy Basketball League Champion
#9
Posted 13 December 2012 - 08:14 PM
I agree with Sir Thursday: you can't judge Howard too harshly now. As somebody who lives in S. CA and watches the Lakers a lot, I see the same problems that the Rockets are having--poor rotations, guys missing assignments, etc. The Lakers are essentially a new team, and thanks to injuries they have no defense at point guard, power forward, or coming off the bench. A great defensive center can only be great if the team has a strong system in place--just ask Omer Asik!
#10
Posted 13 December 2012 - 09:16 PM
The 2013 Red94 Fantasy Basketball League Champion
#11
Posted 14 December 2012 - 02:05 AM
On the Howard deal, I'm a little torn. Howard is clearly better than anyone on our roster when he's healthy and motivated. But wiill he ever be completely healthy again? Probably, but that's a big question mark. Will he ever be motivated? That's an even bigger question mark.
I haven't seen the data that Daryl Morey sees, so maybe he would see this differently, but when I factor in age, character and production Howard only very narrowly edges out Harden. When I look at the other guys Morey was able to bring in around Harden that he might not have been able to acquire with Howard, I feel like he made the best of all potential deals.
The only deals that I would like better than what happened this summer would have to involve the following names: LeBron, Chris Paul, Kevin Durant, Anthony Davis, and Healthy Derrick Rose. Maybe Kevin Love or Blake Griffin, but I want to see better D out of my bigs.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Morey, Dwight Howard, Nene, Pau Gasol
Forums →
Houston Rockets and NBA Basketball →
Should the Rockets try to trade for Demarcus Cousins?Started by Paradise, 16 Dec 2012 |
|
|
||
Forums →
Houston Rockets and NBA Basketball →
What is Morey Job description? Economics or Win?Started by Guest_RedStewie_* , 26 Apr 2012 |
|
|
||
Forums →
Houston Rockets and NBA Basketball →
Poll Blame GameStarted by RocketMan, 23 Apr 2012 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













