Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  slick shoes : (23 November 2015 - 07:15 PM) I think that is the worst part about our season thus far. We fired a guy who had little to do with the problem instead of addressing the real issue of team chemistry which is becoming more and more apparent. I don't think anyone is on the same page as anyone else.
@  cointurtlemoose : (21 November 2015 - 06:39 AM) McHale might not have been a great coach, but he definitely was NOT the problem with this team...
@  majik19 : (21 November 2015 - 02:31 AM) our team is just embarassing
@  cointurtlemoose : (19 November 2015 - 07:11 AM) That was the most Corey Brewer thing I have ever seen
@  majik19 : (19 November 2015 - 04:20 AM) how the hell did that happen? maybe just switching from McHale to JB will change our bad luck...
@  Willk : (19 November 2015 - 03:58 AM) in my face
@  bboley24 : (19 November 2015 - 03:55 AM) So that just happened
@  Cooper : (19 November 2015 - 03:53 AM) got the win
@  Willk : (19 November 2015 - 02:06 AM) fire McHale! playing like crap again
@  SadLakerFan : (18 November 2015 - 06:21 PM) It's unfair, but it's the right move because it's the only move major move they had available to them. But, it seems just a tad premature - I wonder what was really said in the player meeting.
@  majik19 : (18 November 2015 - 06:03 PM) So much for building off continuity now that the core is in place... It's probably about time for another "Morey's Plan" article from Rahat.
@  txtdo1411 : (18 November 2015 - 05:26 PM) No problem. He definitely made it clear that changes will continue to be made until we are winning again.
@  cointurtlemoose : (18 November 2015 - 05:19 PM) Thanks for the link, txtdo; good words from Morey, I thought
@  cointurtlemoose : (18 November 2015 - 05:14 PM) Wow, I expected this 6 or 7 games from now if things didn't change... This seems a tad early. And they better have a replacement actually in mind and ready to hire, otherwise this seems like a misguided move
@  txtdo1411 : (18 November 2015 - 05:13 PM) Its going on right now.
@  txtdo1411 : (18 November 2015 - 05:13 PM) http://api.viglink.c...9&title=Rockets Press Conference 11am - ClutchFans&txt=http://www.khou.com/videos/news/loca...7/29/12651418/
@  slick shoes : (18 November 2015 - 05:12 PM) Anyone know where to listen in to the DM press conference?
@  DenverRocket : (18 November 2015 - 04:50 PM) Shocked too, but then again not. Something had to give. I can't see JB being given the reins f/t. Surely they have a contingency? Thibs?
@  txtdo1411 : (18 November 2015 - 04:48 PM) I wonder if the plan is to find a replacement fairly quickly, or to give JB a shot. I'm trying to understand how things would change, since JB has been in the locker room all year. The players are going to give him effort now just because McHale is gone?
@  majik19 : (18 November 2015 - 04:22 PM) just shocked. I feel like this is now a lost season. We were struggling under McHale, but do we really think J.B. can lead us to a championship?


Recap: San Antonio Spurs 134, Houston Rockets 126.

  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Red94


    Senior Member

  • Administrators
  • 1,429 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 04:27 AM

New post: Recap: San Antonio Spurs 134, Houston Rockets 126.
  • 0

#2 Bigtkirk



  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 88 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 12:09 PM

This was a highly entertaining game and a good example of why this Rockets team is the most fun to watch in years.

You're correct that with the coaching staff apparently unwilling to continue giving Morris time to develop as a wing, this team is woefully thin at that position. Although I think you're point is correct about Parsons, Asik, and Patterson being reasonably good defenders, Lin and Douglas are only average defenders and Delfino is considerably below-average as a wing defender. Delfino's ineffectiveness in playing over 38 minutes was a major factor in the Rockets losing this game.

Finally, my sense is that Lin and Harden will eventually be fine together. These things take time -- they still have had less than 20 games together. Lin seems like the type of PG who will figure out a way to make the combo work. Plus, Lin's jumper falling like it was last night has a way of expediting any tandem's effectiveness.
  • 0

#3 Rahat Huq

Rahat Huq


  • Administrators
  • 1,547 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 12:29 PM

I didn't watch this game. (I actually have an exam in about 2 hours.) But I think this puts to bed the notion that Linsanity was a fluke and that the guy is a scrub. You just simply cannot have this many dominant performances by chance.

It just reaffirms the notion that perhaps Lin and Harden aren't the best fit together (hence the premise by myself before that Dragic would've been the better fit next to Harden.)

Both players are clearly legit. It's up to the coaching staff now to somehow make it happen and get these guys to thrive together. And after last night, I now think that's what this year should be about: getting through that growing pain. No more benching Lin in 4th quarters for Douglas for the sake of short term gains. That does us nothing going forward. They have to figure it out, even if it means more losses.
  • 0

#4 Jeby


    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 208 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 05:53 PM

I think Lin and Harden need to both be ready to be option A on any given night, depending on the matchup. Right now Lin always defers to Harden because he's the better player. Lin, Harden and the coaches need to do a better job of recognizing when Lin should take control. This might also get easier when the Beard gets tired of playing 40 minutes per night.
  • 0

#5 thejohnnygold



  • Moderators
  • 4,193 posts
  • LocationAustin, TX

Posted 11 December 2012 - 06:08 PM

Thanks for the recap. Agree with most, but I think Marcus Morris is improving lots. His box scores more often than not show efficiency. This is impressive given his limited touches--he has a similar quality that Harden displayed in OKC coming off the bench for instant offense. He also showed the ability to score out of an iso--something the Rockets need while they decide if they are a pick
  • 0

#6 thejohnnygold



  • Moderators
  • 4,193 posts
  • LocationAustin, TX

Posted 11 December 2012 - 06:12 PM

I should have read the other comments first. Totally agree that Morris needs more playing time and Delfino made me think there was another point shaving scandal in the NBA--horrible play last night.
  • 0




  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 06:35 PM

  • 0

#8 Cooper


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,297 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 10:55 PM

Delfino is pretty bad I'd assume he is only get playing time so they could potentially flip him at the deadline. We don't have much wing depth but they could find a dleague guy as good or better than him at this point.
  • 0

#9 Sir Thursday

Sir Thursday

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,201 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:22 PM

It seems I'm in the minority, but I didn't think Delfino had an awful game last night, at least not for the first three quarters. From where I was sitting, he was one of the main reasons the Spurs bigs were stymied offensively - whenever Duncan or Splitter was setting up in the post Delfino would be there with the hard double team - I remember him disrupting quite a few plays that way. Early on he was also able to deflect quite a few passes - he tends to be pretty good at that. I don't recall seeing him out of position because he gambled for the steal, which is what happens with bad gamblers. If it was possible to count the number of Spurs turnovers he was responsible for causing, I suspect it would be reasonably high. Obviously his shot wasn't falling, and I would agree that he made a couple of dubious decisions in transition down the stretch (in general, the Rockets seemed unusually reticent to push the transition game), but I don't think that completely erases his good work in the early going.

One thing that I've noticed is that Chandler Parsons is getting into a lot of trouble playing off his man on the perimeter. Especially when matched up with quicker guys he gives them a lot of room in order to cut off the drive, but in the last couple of games that has just let his assignment hit a three pointer in his face (see Mayo, OJ and Neal, Gary). Perhaps his shoulder is making him reticent about bodying up his man quite so much? Hopefully the coaching staff will point this out to him and get him to run players off the three point line a bit more. It certainly would have been preferable last night for him to have been forcing Neal to beat him off the dribble. We like to think of him as our stopper, but it's worth mentioning that he's still not quite there yet.

I did like that he was a lot more assertive behind the three point line tonight. Despite his shot not falling in the early going he stuck with it and eventually they started dropping - I don't recall anywhere near the number of open shots being passed up that there have been in previous games, so that's good.

Also great to see Asik back providing a bit of offence again. When the coaches can't trust Asik to provide a modicum of competency when he's passed the ball, the team's offence really struggles. Tonight he was putting up points from his touches (whether via the free throw line, putbacks, or that jaw dropping bank shot late in regulation) and the whole team flowed better as a result. Would like to see Patterson get back into the groove again - we could really use a bit more from him if Harden is going to be out for any length of time.


EDIT: said majority when I meant minority. Doh!

Edited by Sir Thursday, 12 December 2012 - 10:49 AM.

  • 0

#10 Johnny Rocket

Johnny Rocket

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 215 posts

Posted 12 December 2012 - 01:29 AM

"Someone who is far more intelligent about basketball than I am needs to explain our defense, because at this point I have no idea what’s going on. Douglas, Lin, Parsons, Asik, and Patterson. All five are guys who have at least good reputation at defense, and no one on the squad has a reputation of being a particularly bad or a Kevin Martin level defender."

I totally agree with Paul's sentiments and I hope Rahat and the rest of the staff at Red94 will follow up. I'm shocked how good our offense is, and equally shocked how bad our defense is. Perhaps its the lack of time together as a team--good individual defenders not working together is problematic. I also think we are too passive on defensive--we need to more aggressively trap and double-team to get teams out of their comfort zone.
  • 0

#11 ale11


    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 719 posts
  • LocationMontevideo, Uruguay

Posted 12 December 2012 - 01:03 PM

Our troubles in defense might have to do with time to know each other, but obviously, being the team with the highest rate of turnovers has everything to do with that. We usually get killed in fastbrake score and that's probably because Asik is not fast enough to get to defense if we are turning the ball THAT much....first thing to do to improve the defense? KEEP THE TURNOVERS DOWN!
  • 0

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users