Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  bboley24 : (20 May 2013 - 03:04 PM) b.) No one has mentioned the hoopsworld rumor that DH is intrigued with the possibility of yours truely
@  bboley24 : (20 May 2013 - 03:04 PM) a.) Royce has screwed up any chance of someone with pyschological disorders to get signed.  So much for being a Pioneer
@  2016Champions : (20 May 2013 - 11:12 AM) The question remains, how do you rank them? By "who dominated their era more" or do you use the "time machine" argument?
@  2016Champions : (20 May 2013 - 11:10 AM) That's pretty much what pioneer means.
@  rocketrick : (20 May 2013 - 07:44 AM) If it weren't for the "pioneers", the NBA wouldn't be what it is today. Royce White will probably make more money in his limited "career" than some of the big name players from past eras who made the game what it is today.
@  2016Champions : (20 May 2013 - 02:45 AM) How do you rank someone like that?
@  2016Champions : (20 May 2013 - 02:44 AM) I mean, Bill Russell is the GOAT if you're talking about who dominated his era the most, but in today's game he might just be a rich man's Ben Wallace.
@  2016Champions : (20 May 2013 - 02:42 AM) I think pioneers should be on a completely different list all together, but that's probably just me.
@  rocketrick : (19 May 2013 - 11:46 PM) Although most on this forum never saw them play, I think it's difficult at best to keep Bob Cousy and Oscar Robertson off this list.
@  timetodienow... : (19 May 2013 - 10:59 PM) Top 5 point guards of all time 1)Magic, 2)Stockton, 3)Nash, 4)Thomas, 5)Kidd IMO
@  Richards : (19 May 2013 - 10:39 PM) Hate to see a player like him going out now. Time has come for sure though.
@  2016Champions : (19 May 2013 - 06:23 PM) Time to retire. Do you think he could become a coach one day?
@  Richards : (19 May 2013 - 03:27 PM) Jason Kidd 10 straight games, and total of 25 games for this season with zero points.
@  feelingsuper... : (18 May 2013 - 01:01 AM) I had no problem this evening.
@  thejohnnygold : (17 May 2013 - 11:20 PM) it's working for me
@  2016Champions : (17 May 2013 - 10:20 PM) Does anyone else have trouble accessing page 4 of the James Harden thread?
@  Sir Thursday : (16 May 2013 - 04:10 PM) @BenQueens: Probability of that happening is 4.5%. Still, didn't cost them in the end...
@  BenQueens : (16 May 2013 - 04:30 AM) Randolph 1/4FT in the last minute. Career 76.5% - Wow.
@  BenQueens : (16 May 2013 - 04:20 AM) Bad time for the Thunder to lose track of Tony Allen.
@  BenQueens : (15 May 2013 - 03:38 AM) Is SAS-GS Game 5 an object lesson in the danger of relying on jumpshots?

Photo

Outlining a plan of attack


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 MichaelPina

MichaelPina

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31 posts

Posted 10 August 2012 - 07:13 PM

Here's my latest piece that gets into the specifics of why the Rockets, as an organization, should be looking forward to the next few years: http://www.red94.net...an-attack/9938/

#2 tombrokeoff

tombrokeoff

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 446 posts
  • LocationHouston

Posted 10 August 2012 - 07:21 PM

nice. i like it!

#3 ale11

ale11

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 488 posts
  • LocationMontevideo, Uruguay

Posted 11 August 2012 - 01:54 AM

Really nice piece....I never noticed all those things, all combined are awesome! Specially the part of salary cap, we could really go for two or three superstars (I'm not saying Morey will pull it, but it's easier to get two superstars at the same time instead of only one with our roster. It's likely that "superstar buddies" might want to play together and we could provide that environment salary-wise)

#4 blakecouey

blakecouey

    Red94 Chief of Police

  • Moderators
  • 978 posts

Posted 11 August 2012 - 01:53 PM

Really nice piece....I never noticed all those things, all combined are awesome! Specially the part of salary cap, we could really go for two or three superstars (I'm not saying Morey will pull it, but it's easier to get two superstars at the same time instead of only one with our roster. It's likely that "superstar buddies" might want to play together and we could provide that environment salary-wise)

Definitely true, out of those FA's listed though I don't see any other than Bynum that have expressed any interest in Houston. That doesn't mean we have zero chance at them, we can obviously try sign and trades to get them their extra year/cash and as said pursue adding two superstars.

Ty Lawson(RFA) and Devin Harris(I know other's opinion of him aren't high, but I like his play) are also available next summer.
Have a Twitter? Post your info here and have it added to gain more followers and faster Rockets and Red94 news.
http://www.red94.net...ic/310-twitter/

#5 rockets best fan

rockets best fan

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,442 posts
  • Locationhouston

Posted 11 August 2012 - 02:51 PM

nice artical outlining our position. it's also a fact okc and the lakers will be top seeds in the west over the next couple of years. I wasn't on board at the beginning of the rebuilding process, but have warmed up to the idea. sometimes if you can't trade for a superstar you have to grow one. looking forward to watching this young talent develope

#6 Sir Thursday

Sir Thursday

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 578 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 11 August 2012 - 04:34 PM

As I see it, the current Championship arms race between the Lakers, OKC and the Heat is such that at least for the next couple of years no other teams are really going to stand a chance. So this is actually the best time to be bottoming out - gathering ourselves while the dynasties at the top run their course. And then in 3-4 years, when LeBron is starting to get old, the Lakers are starting to rebuild around Howard and the Thunder have seen a lot of their role players leave to get paid elsewhere, then we'll be there, and in a position to compete.

Or at least that's the theory. But rebuilding is far from a sure thing. It's a painful process, and there's no guarantee that we get out of it quickly. 3 years is really the minimum we can expect before being in a state ready to compete.

ST

#7 DaDakota

DaDakota

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 162 posts
  • LocationAustin

Posted 13 August 2012 - 03:42 PM

Nice read ! I suggest the following.

Posted Image

#8 rocketrick

rocketrick

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 396 posts

Posted 14 August 2012 - 07:24 AM

As I see it, the current Championship arms race between the Lakers, OKC and the Heat is such that at least for the next couple of years no other teams are really going to stand a chance. So this is actually the best time to be bottoming out - gathering ourselves while the dynasties at the top run their course. And then in 3-4 years, when LeBron is starting to get old, the Lakers are starting to rebuild around Howard and the Thunder have seen a lot of their role players leave to get paid elsewhere, then we'll be there, and in a position to compete.

Or at least that's the theory. But rebuilding is far from a sure thing. It's a painful process, and there's no guarantee that we get out of it quickly. 3 years is really the minimum we can expect before being in a state ready to compete.

ST


I think Sir Thursday is on to a good strategy. The only thing I would add is let's see if we can become more competitive quicker so that 2-3 years from now we're at least scaring the shit out of the top seeds in the playoffs. Then perhaps at that time finally finding the right 1-2 franchise players to add to our scrappy squad will get us over the hump to become a true NBA championship contender. That's what all of this is about, to contend for the Title and win Championships!!!




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users