Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  slick shoes : (17 March 2016 - 02:54 AM) are you surprised? this is the same team that we've seen all season. so much talk from the locker room about improvement and change. the grizz win was a fluke.
@  Cooper : (17 March 2016 - 02:52 AM) on pace to give up 144 at half, pathetic effort.
@  RocketMan : (15 March 2016 - 11:34 PM) Per the references, yes.
@  slick shoes : (15 March 2016 - 12:51 PM) Is Terrence Jones even on the team any more?
@  majik19 : (12 March 2016 - 06:15 AM) didn't watch the whole game, but we actually looked solid on both ends. the defense was rotating appropriately. i can hardly believe it.
@  DenverRocket : (11 March 2016 - 08:51 PM) Great interview with DM: http://espn.go.com/e...lay?id=14951528
@  majik19 : (10 March 2016 - 02:20 AM) pathetic how close this game is...
@  thejohnnygold : (06 March 2016 - 12:48 AM) Those are some sweet socks. Have fun!
@  bboley24 : (05 March 2016 - 06:38 PM) Im going to the game tonight in Chicago. Ill be in the bright rockets sweater. Wearing my socks as usual. Then off to the Cleveland game in a few weeks as well! My wife is an amazing woman.
@  thejohnnygold : (05 March 2016 - 05:52 PM) Dekker and Harell looking pretty good down in RGV...especially Harell. LINK
@  majik19 : (03 March 2016 - 04:53 PM) the Rockets are so desperate they signed Michael Beasley to a 1+ year contract...
@  thejohnnygold : (03 March 2016 - 01:59 AM) Gotta admit, I like what I'm seeing so far...4 minutes left in 1st half and the entire team looks good...now if we can just get some of these 3's to fall...
@  slick shoes : (02 March 2016 - 09:10 PM) I wonder what happens to his share of the team now?
@  slick shoes : (02 March 2016 - 09:09 PM) "The Oklahoma City Police Department said he was traveling at a high speed and "pretty much drove straight into the wall.""
@  thejohnnygold : (02 March 2016 - 08:57 PM) Sounds more like suicide...
@  slick shoes : (02 March 2016 - 08:14 PM) So the minority owner of the Thunder died in a one car accident one day after being indicted for antitrust.... Coincidence?
@  slick shoes : (01 March 2016 - 10:56 PM) That's the one, JG. Smooth as eggs.
@  majik19 : (01 March 2016 - 08:49 PM) Milwaukee averages 99.1 pts per game. We gave up 128. What more proof do we need that our defensive scheme is nonexistent?
@  Sir Thursday : (01 March 2016 - 07:50 PM) So, Ty Lawson is gone. Let's see if the team can keep their unbeaten record going when he's not in uniform (currently 7-0!)
@  thejohnnygold : (01 March 2016 - 07:28 PM) You mean this pass? :)

Photo

What Do the Rockets Need from the Power Forward Position?


  • Please log in to reply
60 replies to this topic

#1 Red94

Red94

    Senior Member

  • Administrators
  • 1,493 posts

    Posted 21 October 2013 - 04:17 PM

    New post: What Do the Rockets Need from the Power Forward Position?
    By: Forrest Walker

    We know what the power forward does. He’s the scoring big man, the play next to the center who helps corral rebounds and scores the ball in and around the paint. He’s big, powerful, methodical and hopefully plays some defense. He can probably shoot a bit better than the small forward, and sometimes might even have a three point shot. That’s what you get out of the power forward, isn’t it?

    We all know better, too. Positions mean less and less each season, and different teams have deeply different needs and rosters. The traditional, plodding big man ideal of the power forward is being interred as we speak, and the Rockets are happy to throw dirt on the grave. The Houston Rockets don’t have a traditional power forward because they don’t need or even want a traditional power forward. What they do need from that position is complicated and nontraditional, much like the Rockets themselves.

    First and foremost, the Rockets need shooting. They need shooting from the point guard, the shooting guard, the small forward and even the power forward. If Houston’s offense is to work, every player except the center needs to be able to camp out at the three point line and set some screens if need be. Shooting keeps defenses honest, and honest defenses can’t pack the paint. Without a packed paint, Dwight Howard and James Harden can use their pick and roll prowess to sow chaos and reap piles of points. All of this goes back to being a credible three point threat, a skill which Houston spends time and effort finding.

    The next most important ability the second-tallest player needs to accomplish is simple in concept: Defense. If a power forward can’t guard the opposing power forward, a defensive hole arises. Like water coming through a levee, opposing offenses will quickly attack that spot until the entire structure collapses. While a small ball style lineup with a Chandler Parsons at the four may excel on offense, the defensive liabilities add up. Larger players will simply back down any wings who might be masquerading as bigs. The curious thing about this need is that it’s possible to spread it across the five players on the floor, unlike something like shooting. If Garcia, for example, is able to defend effectively at the perimeter, Dwight Howard or Ömer Aşık can prioritize sticking to the largest post threat. As long as a player on the floor is able to cope with each defensive assignment, those assignments need not align with the positions as we understand them.

    The last function the power forward spot will have this year for Houston is as an overflow valve for the center position. Dwight Howard and Ömer Aşık both command starter’s minutes. In order to reach the maximum number of minutes for Aşık, the Rockets will have to slide him in next to Dwight Howard at times. It may be a disaster on offense, but that situation features brutal interior defense. This means that the power forward spot won’t have as many minutes free for the starter and bench player, which on another team may have caused a problem on its own. In Houston, a group of young, unproven players make up that rotation. Unproven, role player type players are the lowest maintenance in that regard, as their minutes demands are liable to be much lower.

    When all of this is looked at holistically, a pattern emerges. This type of shooting, defensively versatile, undemanding player is perfect for a small ball lineup. A particularly large three can fulfill these requirements, which begins to make Terrence Jones and Donatas Motiejunas expendable. Chandler Parsons, Omri Casspi or Francisco Garcia suddenly look like not only options at the the four, but as viable starters. Any of them can shoot, all three are big enough to passably defend most opposing bigs, and the ability to slide them to the small forward positions allows Aşık to absorb as many minutes per night as they care to let him. The Houston Rockets don’t need a normal bruiser down low. They need the stretch four of the future, and there’s a decent chance the future is already in Houston.


    • 0

    #2 Mason Khamvilay

    Mason Khamvilay

      Veteran

    • Members
    • PipPipPipPipPipPip
    • 3,216 posts
    • LocationVirginia, USA.

    Posted 21 October 2013 - 07:53 PM

    Our offense was deadly when Delfino was at the 4 last season, but we also gave up a lot of defense, so I guess the ideal 4 would be someone who can give us the good of Delfino without the bad. Personally I think Casspi is a step in the right direction, it's not the huge leap we would have with someone like Ilyasova but for the league minimum we're definitely getting our money's worth. Just think, Rashard Lewis got a $180 million contract for basically doing what Casspi can do at the 4 (Casspi shoots 44% on corner 3's).


    Edited by 2016Champions, 21 October 2013 - 07:56 PM.

    • 0

    #3 thejohnnygold

    thejohnnygold

      Veteran

    • Moderators
    • 4,387 posts
    • LocationAustin, TX

    Posted 21 October 2013 - 08:17 PM

    Our offense was deadly when Delfino was at the 4 last season, but we also gave up a lot of defense, so I guess the ideal 4 would be someone who can give us the good of Delfino without the bad. Personally I think Casspi is a step in the right direction, it's not the huge leap we would have with someone like Ilyasova but for the league minimum we're definitely getting our money's worth. Just think, Rashard Lewis got a $180 million contract for basically doing what Casspi can do at the 4 (Casspi shoots 44% on corner 3's).

    When you put it that way Lewis' contract sounds awful (and it mostly was)....His game dropped off considerably once he got paid and went to Orlando.  Check out Basketball Reference's page on him--especially the last 3 years in Seattle.  They've added a new stat called "3 pt. attempt rate"  it's the percentage of shots he takes behind the arc in reference to his total shots taken.  Once he got to Orlando it went up 40-50% from where it was.

     

    I'm really excited about Casspi too.  I agree, getting him for the league minimum may prove to be the best steal of the off-season (Dwight excluded).


    • 0

    #4 rockets best fan

    rockets best fan

      glad you're on board, but I been on this boat since it left

    • Members
    • PipPipPipPipPipPip
    • 4,211 posts
    • Locationhouston

    Posted 21 October 2013 - 08:22 PM

    I waited for a bit before responding to this post because I'm still sorting out how I feel about the points being raised within this post. I see the advantage of running small ball against some teams and I can see the point raised that Asik can be bought in against bigger teams. however I am not so quick to cast aside the benefit I think T-Jones and D-Mo can provide. within the first unit whoever plays PF isn't going to need to score that much. they only need to be a efficient scorer so as to keep opposing defenses honest. what's much more critical is defense and rebounding. I am not sure that our small ball crew can produce that result regularly. I'm more a fan of bringing Casspi in from the bench to help balance the scoring load within the second unit. there is no doubt at that the position will be handled by committee for awhile, but this Asik Howard pairing is still the biggest linchpin in seeking a true direction at the position


    Edited by rockets best fan, 21 October 2013 - 08:23 PM.

    • 0

    My new years resolution.....drink that special bottle of wine, take your son on that fishing trip, live each day as if it were my last because everyday of LIFE is special B)


    #5 John P

    John P

      Junior Member

    • Members
    • PipPipPip
    • 112 posts

      Posted 21 October 2013 - 09:29 PM



      who is the best 3pt shooting 4 that has good D? Does that person exist. I know it isn't LMA. Is it Love or Bosh? My guess is Bosh is decent at D, having had to buy into LeBron's committment to win but who knows. It usually seems that great D players end up not being great defenders.


      • 0

      #6 Losthief

      Losthief

        Junior Member

      • Members
      • PipPipPip
      • 478 posts
      • LocationHouston

      Posted 21 October 2013 - 09:38 PM

      its DIrk imho. Dirk is a average to plus rebounder, average defender, +shooter, + range

       

      Bosh is a average rebounder, a plus defender (he's great on help d), + shooter, average range

       

      Love is a plus rebounder, not a plus defender, + shooter, + range

       

      Aldridge is average defender, minus rebounder, + shooter, average range.

       

      If channing fyre could play d or rebound he'd be worth getting...but alas if wishes were true....

       

      yeah....rangy stretch 4's with good defense who can anchor the defense when howard isn't in there (assuming we have to give up asik in a trade, we need someone who can do replace that at least marginally), are just not in abundance.

       

      I like bosh and aldridge for there ability to (at least to a small degree) anchor the defense better than the others if we lose omer. Ideally a 3 team trade involving a back-up defensive anchor (a la bogut, robin lopez, etc etc) and a solid defending stretch four would be ideal, which is why im sure we haven't jumped the gun yet on omer.


      Edited by Losthief, 21 October 2013 - 09:44 PM.

      • 0

      LoSTHieF

      I'd Rather Be Lucky Than Skilled


      #7 Mason Khamvilay

      Mason Khamvilay

        Veteran

      • Members
      • PipPipPipPipPipPip
      • 3,216 posts
      • LocationVirginia, USA.

      Posted 21 October 2013 - 10:55 PM

      its DIrk imho. Dirk is a average to plus rebounder, average defender, +shooter, + range

       

      Bosh is a average rebounder, a plus defender (he's great on help d), + shooter, average range

       

      Love is a plus rebounder, not a plus defender, + shooter, + range

       

      Aldridge is average defender, minus rebounder, + shooter, average range.

       

      If channing fyre could play d or rebound he'd be worth getting...but alas if wishes were true....

       

      yeah....rangy stretch 4's with good defense who can anchor the defense when howard isn't in there (assuming we have to give up asik in a trade, we need someone who can do replace that at least marginally), are just not in abundance.

       

      I like bosh and aldridge for there ability to (at least to a small degree) anchor the defense better than the others if we lose omer. Ideally a 3 team trade involving a back-up defensive anchor (a la bogut, robin lopez, etc etc) and a solid defending stretch four would be ideal, which is why im sure we haven't jumped the gun yet on omer.

      Why is there no mention for Ilyasova here? He's a pretty decent defender, not elite but definitely above average, and he's an absolute sniper from 3.


      • 0

      #8 Rahat Huq

      Rahat Huq

        Administrator

      • Administrators
      • 1,556 posts

        Posted 22 October 2013 - 12:01 AM

        Ilyasova needs to be a target and is an under the radar guy.  

         

        I think I'd actually prefer someone who can shoot and also sort of handle the rock (like Chandler) while realizing that player would give up size.  Hell, to that end, what about just playing Chandler at the 4 and trading for an All-Star level small forward?  If all 4 of your perimeter players can handle the ball, you can run alot of interesting misdirection pick and rolls...and I think you make up what you lose on the other end.  


        • 0

        #9 rockets best fan

        rockets best fan

          glad you're on board, but I been on this boat since it left

        • Members
        • PipPipPipPipPipPip
        • 4,211 posts
        • Locationhouston

        Posted 22 October 2013 - 12:22 AM

        I really like Ilyasova..........a lot, but can he play backup center? NO.........so how is he that much of an upgrade. we already have players who can perform Ilyasova's strengths so why would we give up Asik to duplicate skillsets. if it comes down to moving Asik we should be looking to add new skillsets rather than duplicating ones that already exist within the team. I would much rather (if we go with the small ball lineup as the bread and butter lineup) put Casspi there and use Asik to add a new wrinkle. if we are not trading for a star player at the 4 spot I would rather ride it out with Asik whether he's happy or not. the defensive gains from Asik outweigh bringing in more PF's to help further clog the position if not receiving a star player there. also I don't think we can overlook this point. with Camby's unsettled status, whatever player we bring in needs to be able to play center in a pinch. that will give us greater balance and more options to play with


        • 0

        My new years resolution.....drink that special bottle of wine, take your son on that fishing trip, live each day as if it were my last because everyday of LIFE is special B)


        #10 timetodienow1234567

        timetodienow1234567

          Veteran

        • Members
        • PipPipPipPipPipPip
        • 2,598 posts
        • LocationAlabama

        Posted 22 October 2013 - 12:39 AM

        1) On ball defense
        2) 18 foot jumper
        3) Help defense
        4) 3 point shot
        5) Rebounding
        6) Ability to play C for short stretches
        7) PnR
        8) Cutting
        9) Passing
        10) Toughness
        • 0

        Why so Serious? :D


        #11 Losthief

        Losthief

          Junior Member

        • Members
        • PipPipPip
        • 478 posts
        • LocationHouston

        Posted 22 October 2013 - 12:49 AM

        Why is there no mention for Ilyasova here? He's a pretty decent defender, not elite but definitely above average, and he's an absolute sniper from 3.

         

        honestly i forgot him lol.

         

        I'd rate him minus rebounder, average defender, +shooter, +range


        • 0

        LoSTHieF

        I'd Rather Be Lucky Than Skilled


        #12 ale11

        ale11

          Advanced Member

        • Members
        • PipPipPipPip
        • 740 posts
        • LocationMontevideo, Uruguay

        Posted 22 October 2013 - 02:04 AM

        Milwaukee have already commited themselves on Sanders, so I'm not sure they are interested in acquiring Asik....


        Edited by ale11, 22 October 2013 - 02:05 AM.

        • 0

        #13 rocketrick

        rocketrick

          Senior Member

        • Members
        • PipPipPipPipPip
        • 1,865 posts

          Posted 22 October 2013 - 08:56 AM

          After seeing the Rockets play earlier tonight, I am more comfortable with our roster in terms of the PF position. It should be renamed the Stretch 4 position, though, as that is what this position has evolved into over the past few years in the NBA with only a couple of exceptions league wide.

          I believe Casspi can handle a heavy workload at the PF spot, at least in the early part of the season, until one of our sophomores steps up to become a reliable starter. Even in stating this, it seems possible to me that one of the sophomores may be inserted in the starting lineup for a few minutes in both opening halves. I think Casspi is going to be more effective for us coming off the bench and can handle some time on the floor with Francisco Garcia, D12 or Asik, and 2 of our guards, be it Harden, Lin or Beverly, which would give Parsons time for a breather. I really like the 8-man rotation, plus one, that I think the Rockets are headed for to begin this season.

          It would be helpful if the Rockets could find one more dependable swingman to cover for inevitable injuries that will come during the season. Brewer may be worth hanging onto for his defensive prowess. He made one excellent steal in his limited time on the floor in tonight's game and was a whisker away from a second steal. I'm not certain if Reggie is going to make the roster, he may have missed too much of the pre-season already and didn't show much in tonight's game I his limited playing time.

          In my mind, the ideal trade for Asik may now be for a more dependable 3 who can fill in, hit 3's, play stellar defense and just be consistent along with either a stretch 4 or a solid (and cheaper) backup for D12. If Camby can come back and give the Rockets some steady backup C minutes, then that should allow the Rockets to have more flexibility going forward with Asik.
          • 0

          #14 It's Dee Way Ferrell

          It's Dee Way Ferrell

            Newbie

          • Members
          • Pip
          • 20 posts
          • LocationHouston

          Posted 22 October 2013 - 11:02 AM

          That's injury to insult.
          My fondest memory of the 1st championship year. That team featured Thorpe & the Dream, two low post players remind you. A defensive minded 3 pt shooting wing, a crafty 2, double edged pg rotation.
          But the most exhilarating time of that year for 18 straight games I seen Mad Max, The Jet, & E.T. all 3 punched it in every time on a break. Man as a bright kid understanding the effects with which a dunks mean. We ended up 17-1 during that run. But it also meant 'we mean business', played hard, ran hard, true we ran out of steam before the season ended, traded for the Kiss of Death, & finished how we started. Soon as we got in the playoffs, now including the K.O.D. with Mad Max, The Jet, & E.T., brought back the Punch Brothers on the breaks during the playoffs. The rest is history. That wa$ a mentality. That wa$ when clutch wa$ born. That wa$ when BELIEVE wa$ born, & WE BELIEVE was reincarnated.

          Ye of little faith said Jesus to his disciples why are you so faithless.

          I myself am ashamed. That you consider all these other alleys, & hadn't yet seen the fruits of our harvest. I have more love for the Rox than I do the texans, but if Rox fans act like Tex fans, we don't deserve championships. We're so eager to turn our backs on them because they get paid hundred thousands to multi-millions, but in reality we chose not 2 be in their shoes, we chose safer routes in life, they chose money, fame &/or championships. Keep Asik & Lin & we'll win rings
          • 0
          I'm so Ferrell!

          #15 rocketrick

          rocketrick

            Senior Member

          • Members
          • PipPipPipPipPip
          • 1,865 posts

            Posted 22 October 2013 - 12:57 PM

            D. Ferrell----------Welcome to the best Rockets forum in the universe!

            I am speechless and breathless after your post, yet, keep in mind the game has changed from when the Rockets won back to back championships to the current day. Stretch 4 back in the 1990's wasn't even a thought, much less reality with any of the teams of that time.

            I clearly remember the back to back championships and your post brought back wonderful memories.
            • 0

            #16 Mason Khamvilay

            Mason Khamvilay

              Veteran

            • Members
            • PipPipPipPipPipPip
            • 3,216 posts
            • LocationVirginia, USA.

            Posted 22 October 2013 - 02:46 PM

            I really hate the term "stretch 4". It just helps to have a PF who can stretch the floor to 23 feet, but for some reason the term stretch 4 is associated with SF's who play the 4 so guys like Robert Horry supposedly isn't a stretch 4.. what a pointless term lol


            • 0

            #17 rockets best fan

            rockets best fan

              glad you're on board, but I been on this boat since it left

            • Members
            • PipPipPipPipPipPip
            • 4,211 posts
            • Locationhouston

            Posted 22 October 2013 - 02:54 PM

            D. Ferrell----------Welcome to the best Rockets forum in the universe!

            I am speechless and breathless after your post, yet, keep in mind the game has changed from when the Rockets won back to back championships to the current day. Stretch 4 back in the 1990's wasn't even a thought, much less reality with any of the teams of that time.

            I clearly remember the back to back championships and your post brought back wonderful memories.

            I disagree. the stretch four was born here in clutch city. during the second championship who was our PF? if you said anything other than Robert Horry you are mistaken, because that's who played the position while Elie held down the SF position


            • 0

            My new years resolution.....drink that special bottle of wine, take your son on that fishing trip, live each day as if it were my last because everyday of LIFE is special B)


            #18 Buckko

            Buckko

              Senior Member

            • Members
            • PipPipPipPipPip
            • 1,636 posts

              Posted 23 October 2013 - 03:19 AM

              Casspi is a bench player, an effective bench player and not a starter. He wouldn't due too good against starting caliber PFs. He doesn't have Delfino's build.


              • 0

              #19 Smoothgrandmama

              Smoothgrandmama

                Newbie

              • Members
              • Pip
              • 4 posts

                Posted 23 October 2013 - 03:43 AM

                Sounds like most of you want Carl Landry......
                • 0

                #20 NorEastern

                NorEastern

                  Junior Member

                • Members
                • PipPipPip
                • 378 posts

                  Posted 23 October 2013 - 04:30 AM

                  The Rockets need little from their PF. Below average defense. Below average rebounding. Hitting the three at a 32% clip. Defending the likes of West and Zach who would make road kill out of Casspi or Parsons. But what is much more interesting is what the Rockets do not need from their PF. Shots. There are not enough of those to go around. The Rockets offense is dominated by players who can score. Every shot taken by the PF is one less shot for Harden, Howard, Parsons ... Only one ball and one basket.

                  The other thing the Rockets need from the PF position is cheap.
                  • 0




                  0 user(s) are reading this topic

                  0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users