Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  slick shoes : (21 June 2019 - 01:20 AM) ....and the new uniforms are trash.
@  thejohnnygold : (15 June 2019 - 02:05 PM) Agreed. Although, the injury narrative will probably keep them chirping.
@  slick shoes : (14 June 2019 - 02:40 PM) SO glad all of the Warriors fanboys can crawl back into their respective holes for an entire year. Good for Toronto/Canada as well.
@  thejohnnygold : (05 June 2019 - 07:33 PM) I think so.
@  slick shoes : (04 June 2019 - 07:20 PM) Dame and CJ #2 I assume?
@  thejohnnygold : (30 May 2019 - 05:42 PM) 3rd best backcourt in the NBA!!!
@  slick shoes : (29 May 2019 - 09:04 PM) im sure hed be great alongside jrue holiday and no one else. 100% iso ball all the time.
@  thejohnnygold : (29 May 2019 - 06:46 PM) Anthony Davis + the #1 pick?
@  slick shoes : (29 May 2019 - 05:39 PM) shopping the entire team including james. what is the point if you trade our best player away? what could we possibly get in return that is equal value of james harden?
@  slick shoes : (11 May 2019 - 02:07 AM) turnovers and missed free throws the theme of the game thus far. throwing away endless points.
@  thejohnnygold : (09 May 2019 - 01:35 PM) I wish we had found a way to steal that game...it was there for the taking.
@  Mario Peña : (01 May 2019 - 04:09 AM) Is it me or does Capela look in over his head? Why is this happening now?
@  Mario Peña : (26 April 2019 - 09:14 PM) Imagine how much it ticks off Beverly, Harrell and Williams.
@  slick shoes : (25 April 2019 - 09:58 PM) Power move by the Rockets. We travel to Oakland ahead of their next game with the assumption that GSW wins. This gives LAC bulletin board material for the game.
@  thejohnnygold : (24 April 2019 - 01:47 PM) We needed to dust off Nene either way...I think that's the way to go.
@  Mario Peña : (23 April 2019 - 09:48 PM) I wonder if kicking the tires on Nene would be beneficial. Some Nene PNR and board crashing in short stints could help against Gobert/Favors.
@  slick shoes : (23 April 2019 - 09:26 PM) Going to have to dig deep tomorrow night with Clint limited. Will be curious to see how the coaching staff adjusts to their new formula. Perhaps driving in to Gobert and getting him in early foul trouble.
@  Mario Peña : (18 April 2019 - 03:41 PM) I agree slick.
@  slick shoes : (17 April 2019 - 01:02 PM) Boogie was their answer to our run in the WCF last year. When we cover all of their shooters they can dump it to Cousins who has a physical advantage over Clint and can also shoot the 3 which pulls him from the rim. They still have Bogut but this takes them back to the W's of last year which our team has shown to match up well against with full strength.
@  Mario Peña : (16 April 2019 - 08:50 PM) I think in a general sense you are correct Johnny. Getting specific to the Rockets though I think we have the personnel to wear Curry down defensively and offensively so for the Rockets could the exit of Cousins be a good thing? To me Cousins also presented a possible matchup wrinkle the Rockets have had to figure out, maybe?

Photo

Dwight Howard Free Agency Watch


  • Please log in to reply
574 replies to this topic

#21 rockets best fan

rockets best fan

    glad you're on board, but I been on this boat since it left

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,299 posts
  • Locationhouston

Posted 03 June 2013 - 04:44 AM

I think most of you know how I feel about j-lin :lol: I have been trying to argue his value verse contract for awhile.....I'm not going to bash him, but now it makes even more since for the rockets to move him. his contract not only frees enough room to sign D-12, but also makes it possible without loosing other pieces. the rockets might be able to hold on to either brooks or delfino.....likely brooks with lin gone. whatever we get in return is a gift just as long as it doesn't land on the salary cap. you all know I don't view him as a core piece to this team. he is the one player we can loose and not be greatly affected whose contract will get the job done.......what do you think?


  • 0

My new years resolution.....drink that special bottle of wine, take your son on that fishing trip, live each day as if it were my last because everyday of LIFE is special B)


#22 Mason Khamvilay

Mason Khamvilay

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,216 posts
  • LocationVirginia, USA.

Posted 03 June 2013 - 05:14 AM

I think you've voiced your perspective on Jeremy Lin about 236 times on several different threads, give or take. 


  • 0

#23 rockets best fan

rockets best fan

    glad you're on board, but I been on this boat since it left

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,299 posts
  • Locationhouston

Posted 03 June 2013 - 05:53 AM

I think you've voiced your perspective on Jeremy Lin about 236 times on several different threads, give or take. 

you sure.........I thought it was only 235 :lol:


  • 0

My new years resolution.....drink that special bottle of wine, take your son on that fishing trip, live each day as if it were my last because everyday of LIFE is special B)


#24 RollingWave

RollingWave

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 506 posts

Posted 03 June 2013 - 07:35 AM

Interesting, if the cap doesn't move then this makes getting Howard a little more difficult then I first thought that's for sure. we'll see how Morey maneuver this, it's well within the realm of plausibility but certainly it adds to the difficulties a bit.

 

I'm highly doubtful that we'll get Greg Smith go, as noted even if you do let him go you'll still have a cap hold on the minimum, his contract is very close to the minimum anyway and your unlikely to get a similar caliber replacement at that money.


  • 0

#25 Mason Khamvilay

Mason Khamvilay

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,216 posts
  • LocationVirginia, USA.

Posted 03 June 2013 - 07:41 AM

I like Greg Smith too, but I highly doubt Morey is going to say no to signing Dwight just because he doesn't want to get rid of Greg Smith. 


  • 0

#26 RollingWave

RollingWave

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 506 posts

Posted 03 June 2013 - 10:00 AM

yeah, but Greg Smith will also make only 400k more than the minimum cap hold next year, I'm fairly sure we won't be 400k off between getting and not getting Howard. 

 

(and also, we could just waive him and resign him immediately for the same money afterwards right? because he essentially makes the minimum for 3rd year next year. of course this hinge on no one offering him more.)


  • 0

#27 RollingWave

RollingWave

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 506 posts

Posted 03 June 2013 - 10:42 AM

I closed the other thread to start this one as quite a few developments have occurred in these past few weeks.

.
.
Finally, an interesting peripheral aspect to this whole thing is the debate as to what should be done with Asik once it is time for that bridge to be crossed. I am of the opinion that the two cannot play together, but I am also of the opinion that he is more valuable than Josh Smith who will soon begin to decline. Keeping Asik, even as a backup, allows for 48 minutes of elite paint protection and insurance against a Howard injury. However, Asik's trade value will never be higher, and it is probably not the best asset/value allocation to allot $8million into a 20 minute backup player.



I think the final part is important, in the 62% of the time that Asik was on the floor this year, we were a +7 team which is about the same as the Clippers / Spurs, in the 38% of the time he was off the floor, we were close to a -2 team which put us closer to the Raptors and Wolfs. no one else had nearly as much of an impact as Asik in terms of pure on and off result (the team was actually marginally better with most of the other starters off, but that's more of a reflection of garbage time.), and because he was off a rather significant portions of the time this is very important, I can't see us really going to places if we're going to play like a lottery team 40% of the time a game. Dwight Howard, limited by his back, should not be expected to play 40 too often either.

The margin to improve on the former is fairly limited, even the best team is only like a +9 to +10, and I think we'll improve there even with no personnel change if only due to growth and chemistry, however, the later part demonstrate how much have a high caliber C on the floor all the time means.

Between Howard's back and Asik's Endurance, keeping them both from playing that much more than 30 on a daily basis is probably ideal. and if that means we're a +7-8 all the time or more , that only means we're like a top 3 seed team even in this super brutal conference.

I think people need to remember that most back up C really REALLY suck, Greg Smith was actually one of the better this year in the entire league and he was brutal enough defensively that it negated most of his offensive advantages. Almost all of them are very one dimensional players (think Hasheem Thabeet.) or not very good at either

So if there's one backup spot that's almost certainly worth overpaying for , it's backup C. it's super important, and there's a huge lack of actual qualified players.
  • 1

#28 Mason Khamvilay

Mason Khamvilay

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,216 posts
  • LocationVirginia, USA.

Posted 03 June 2013 - 11:36 AM

yeah, but Greg Smith will also make only 400k more than the minimum cap hold next year, I'm fairly sure we won't be 400k off between getting and not getting Howard. 

 

(and also, we could just waive him and resign him immediately for the same money afterwards right? because he essentially makes the minimum for 3rd year next year. of course this hinge on no one offering him more.)

Here's the math in exact numbers:

  1.  8,374,646 Omer Asik 
  2.  8,374,646 Jeremy Lin
  3. 13,668,750 James Harden
  4.  1,551,840 Terrence Jones
  5.  1,422,720 Donatas Motiejunas
  6.   926,500 Chandler Parsons
  7.   788,872 Patrick Beverley
  8.  490,180 minimum
  9.  490,180 minimum
  10.  490,180 minimum
  11.  490,180 minimum
  12.  490, 180 minimum
Total = $38,787,814 + Dwight = 58,058,514

 

So maybe you're right, we might be able to just squeeze Greg Smith in. But I'm not the guy CBA "experts" bow down to, Larry Coon is, and here are his exact words:

 

A team would have to get $20.5 million below the cap to afford Dwight (assuming he’s not offering any discounts). If Houston lets go of most of their non-guaranteed or team option salary (Anderson, Brooks, Delfino, Garcia, Ohlbrecht, Smith), and they find a taker for Thomas Robinson with no salary coming back, then they’d have about $19.6 million in cap room (assuming a $58.5 million cap).

http://www.hoopsworl...arry-coon-53113

 

According to his calculations I'm off by roughly 100,000 which would be the difference between whether or not we can afford Greg Smith in this scenario. Lets hope I'm right and Coon is wrong, but I wouldn't bet on it. 


  • 0

#29 Cooper

Cooper

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,328 posts

Posted 03 June 2013 - 12:11 PM

In reality if Dwight does want to come here I don't think a 100k is going to be the reason he doesn't.
  • 0

#30 LashtonBryth

LashtonBryth

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 28 posts

Posted 03 June 2013 - 01:04 PM

Here's the math in exact numbers:

  1.  8,374,646 Omer Asik 
  2.  8,374,646 Jeremy Lin
  3. 13,668,750 James Harden
  4.  1,551,840 Terrence Jones
  5.  1,422,720 Donatas Motiejunas
  6.   926,500 Chandler Parsons
  7.   788,872 Patrick Beverley
  8.  490,180 minimum
  9.  490,180 minimum
  10.  490,180 minimum
  11.  490,180 minimum
  12.  490, 180 minimum
Total = $38,787,814 + Dwight = 58,058,514

 

So maybe you're right, we might be able to just squeeze Greg Smith in. But I'm not the guy CBA "experts" bow down to, Larry Coon is, and here are his exact words:

 

http://www.hoopsworl...arry-coon-53113

 

According to his calculations I'm off by roughly 100,000 which would be the difference between whether or not we can afford Greg Smith in this scenario. Lets hope I'm right and Coon is wrong, but I wouldn't bet on it. 

 

38,787,814 + 20,500,000 = 59,287,814, so the Rockets would be over the cap by almost 800k.  They will have to trade another of their forwards (unless they could somehow trade Royce White).


  • 0

#31 Mario Peña

Mario Peña

    Officer

  • Moderators
  • 2,440 posts
  • LocationBuffalo, NY

Posted 03 June 2013 - 01:43 PM

Any reason why Les Alexander won't just pick up the tab on that $800,000 for one year and deal with it later?
  • 0

#32 manmythlegend

manmythlegend

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 185 posts

Posted 03 June 2013 - 02:09 PM

Not sure this article was cited during the discussions about Houston's cap situation, but it goes over several scenarios whereby Houston can accomodate Howard:

 

http://espn.go.com/b...d-dwight-howard


  • 0

#33 LashtonBryth

LashtonBryth

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 28 posts

Posted 03 June 2013 - 02:34 PM

Any reason why Les Alexander won't just pick up the tab on that $800,000 for one year and deal with it later?

 

Houston can only go over the cap signing their own players.  They can't sign a free agent that puts them over the cap.


  • 0

#34 thejohnnygold

thejohnnygold

    Veteran

  • Moderators
  • 5,150 posts
  • LocationAustin, TX

Posted 03 June 2013 - 02:37 PM

I know lots of people think Dwight is going to force a max contract, but isn't it feasible that after his experience in LA (presuming he is leaving) that he would see the value in shaving $2-$3M off that contract so that Houston can afford to put good players around him and actually build a championship team?

 

I will be disappointed if we sign Dwight to the full max.  Not because I don't think he will be worth it, but because it makes surrounding him and Harden with quality talent that much harder.  Yes, I know Morey can find talent at a flea market, but doesn't it make sense to work collectively towards a goal?  If Morey is as good as most here believe then imagine what he could do with an extra $2-$3M per year.  I hope Dwight realizes this and is willing to take a 10% pay cut.  He can earn that back in playoff stipends every year. :)


  • 0

#35 Mario Peña

Mario Peña

    Officer

  • Moderators
  • 2,440 posts
  • LocationBuffalo, NY

Posted 03 June 2013 - 03:29 PM

Thanks LashtonBryth, and I guess the new CBA also prohibits going over through a sign and trade as well. I think I remember that as well.

I thought about that scenario as well johnnygold. Especially after LeBron took less to go to Miami maybe they can spin it to be a positive PR move for Howard. I think whatever Morey cooks up chances are it will be innovative and/or sneaky good.
  • 0

#36 timetodienow1234567

timetodienow1234567

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,598 posts
  • LocationAlabama

Posted 03 June 2013 - 03:43 PM

Agree with you FSS, except for giving Asik/Howard court time together. That's a recipe for disaster.
  • 0

Why so Serious? :D


#37 manmythlegend

manmythlegend

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 185 posts

Posted 03 June 2013 - 04:20 PM

I know lots of people think Dwight is going to force a max contract, but isn't it feasible that after his experience in LA (presuming he is leaving) that he would see the value in shaving $2-$3M off that contract so that Houston can afford to put good players around him and actually build a championship team?

 

I will be disappointed if we sign Dwight to the full max.  Not because I don't think he will be worth it, but because it makes surrounding him and Harden with quality talent that much harder.  Yes, I know Morey can find talent at a flea market, but doesn't it make sense to work collectively towards a goal?  If Morey is as good as most here believe then imagine what he could do with an extra $2-$3M per year.  I hope Dwight realizes this and is willing to take a 10% pay cut.  He can earn that back in playoff stipends every year. :)

 

The only scenario I can see this happening is if he and CP3 decide that they want to join forces, and each would be willing to take a discount. If either is going to give a discount, it's with the existing knowledge that the discount is guaranteed to bring in another elite player.


  • 0

#38 Richards

Richards

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 393 posts

Posted 03 June 2013 - 06:03 PM

We must move Asik if we signed Dwight because -

 

- we can't have 8mil guy as a back up (although we love him so much)

- they might be able to play together but having two poor FT and jump shooters on court is liability during playoff

- we need money for quality backups


  • 0

#39 Rahat Huq

Rahat Huq

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 1,605 posts

Posted 03 June 2013 - 06:05 PM

JohnnyGold: I think you will only see that sort of sacrifice from players at the very end of the line.  Even if Dwight takes less, theoretically, there's still no lock that they'd win the title, so it just doesn't make sense for him.  If there wasn't such an equalizer in terms of the finances (due to the tax issue), I don't think Houston would even be at the table, despite how much more attractive this situation is.  


  • 0

#40 manmythlegend

manmythlegend

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 185 posts

Posted 03 June 2013 - 07:54 PM

If there wasn't such an equalizer in terms of the finances (due to the tax issue), I don't think Houston would even be at the table, despite how much more attractive this situation is.  

 

I think the tax savings thing, while real, is a tad overblown.  However, it might work on someone as fragile-minded as Howard.


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users