≡ Menu

Breaking down Houston’s collapse

Dry salt lies fresh in Houston’s open wound, and what I’d like to do right now— place the NBA’s postseason on its rightful pedestal—could sting a bit. The playoffs are an accomplishment and should be treated as such. This is about advancing to a second season, solidifying yourself among the league’s top half, and guaranteeing a chance at winning a championship. Opening yourself up to a different level of good will, competition, and public exposure, both on an individual level as players, and as a franchise, in my opinion, outweighs everything.

For just a second, try to ignore the connection between merit and losing that exists in today’s NBA. Ignore any good that comes by virtue of tanking. Ignore draft picks, renovation, and hope. What I want to do is forget about the future, and analyze what just happened. Before their loss in New Orleans on Thursday night, I said on Twitter all week that I believed the Rockets were mortal locks to make the postseason. The idea was unpopular, but after watching almost every game this team played all year, it seemed more than likely. These guys weren’t a typical annual feel good story line; pawns straggling along in some hopeless underdog narrative. Yes, they faced tons of adversity, and defied almost every conceivable odd in doing so, but regardless this team was good. They played hard, they played together, and they played with more talent than they’ll probably ever be recognized for. 

It got me thinking about the type of things 29 fan bases collectively ponder at the end of every season. Questions like, “Why did my team have to lose?” Except in Houston’s case, what I’m interested in learning is how they managed to collapse the way they did. On an all encompassing, cerebral level, it’s a question that has no one answer and no indisputable truth. For example, the Rockets were terrible in the third quarter in almost all of those games, yet not even Kevin McHale could explain with 100% certainty why this was.

What follows can best be described as my difficult attempt at scratching the surface in explaining what the hell happened to this basketball team. We’ll start the analysis on April 2; 10 games ago. The Rockets had just come back to defeat a tough, uber-territorial Bulls squad  and were on the cusp of a sudden four game win streak that would memorably be aided three nights later by Andrew Bynum’s unmellowed attitude towards their bench.

At the time they were 29-25, and feeling good about where things were headed. Then on April 11, their playoffs before the playoffs began. Over the next week the Rockets played five games against four teams that were all fighting for three playoff spots. The situation was dense, but far from uncomfortable. Houston had been playing well despite seeing various key members of their team drop like flies throughout the season, and it appeared they were well adjusted to the personnel they had. Here are some of the most noticeable extremes that happened in those last 10 games.

1) They didn’t get to the free-throw line. With no consistent presence on the interior apart from Luis Scola (who in my opinion remains underrated), the Rockets were never confused with an elite team that gets to the free-throw line. Speedy Goran Dragic has the ability to draw contact better than almost every player in the league, but he’s human, and the toll his relatively small frame took dancing in the lane simply wasn’t sustainable. The Rockets lived and died on jump shots and threes.

They ranked 27th over the last 10 games in free-throw rate, meaning their free-throws attempted relative to their field goals attempted was flat out awful. In games like this, where possession after possession becomes more and more important, the free-throw line is THE place to live. Throughout the season this was a problem for the team (they’re currently ranked right after Dallas at 28th) and as I mentioned earlier, personnel is clearly an issue…but come on. The fact of the matter is that these games were physical battles, and if it took guys expanding upon their own comfort levels to get wins, then that’s what needed to be done. Obviously, that didn’t happen.

2) They didn’t turn the ball over: This makes explaining their losses quite difficult. The Rockets were the second best team in the entire league over the course of these last 10 games when it came to hanging onto the ball, a crucial component in deciding who wins and who loses. It was something they were below average at during the year (they now rank 17th, and that takes into account those last 10 games of super careful play), so for them to lose six straight while improving on an underlying weakness just adds insult to injury.

Of course, holding onto the ball is great, but the name of the game is putting it through the hoop, and the Rockets posted a true shooting percentage of 51.9% which placed them just above the Wizards and Nets for 22nd in the league. Also, despite their great security, they somehow managed to give up 15.3 fast break points per game; a stat that suggests some things just aren’t meant to be.

3) Their defense was awful: The offense averaged 1.03 PPP, putting them ahead of Miami, and just behind Oklahoma City and Boston in terms of efficiency, but the defense was another story. With teams who were capable of going with small lineups to keep Dalembert on the bench (i.e. Denver) the defense suffered mightily. In the 10 games they ranked 20th in points allowed per 100 possessions and were a general mess, especially in the paint, where they surrendered 45.1 points, the third highest in the league.

4) They played at their pace: The Rockets are generally one of the faster teams in the league. They have youth, speed, and no ball-dominating isolation players; restricting the first two characteristics wouldn’t make any sense. They run, they gun. Over their last 10 games, the only thing that changed was they got a little faster. This might attribute to their inability to get to the free-throw line a bit, but overall it should be seen as a positive that they didn’t deviate from their style during the season’s most important stretch of action.

So what does this all say about the team’s collapse? They either picked a really bad time to revert to who they really are, or a bad time to play below what they showed throughout the season to be their potential. Either way, bad timing is bad timing. Say what you want about draft picks, and how now we don’t have to give our first rounder to Brooklyn, but a gigantic opportunity was missed here. Making the playoffs and winning a couple games (who knows, maybe even a series, and then anything can happen) is a positive experience that lasts inside each and every player—most of these guys are young, and getting them to play together in games of upgraded significance is an unquantifiable step in the right direction.

Everyone will have their own explanation for why this Rockets team didn’t qualify for an honest to goodness up-for-grabs tournament to the championship (I didn’t even mention Marcus Camby’s health which was undeniably significant) but one thing  is for sure: in an undivided culture filled with people who’d rather look forward to a hopeful tomorrow than enjoy a fruitful today, this one really hurts.

 

Twitter: @ShakyAnkles






in essays
wtflife
wtflife 5pts

I think blaming Lowry is lazy. The Rockets played hard every night this season. Or at least the majority of games I watched. I think what we saw is that they were at their ceiling while the other teams could play harder and had more talent. This implies Morey hasn't done a great job. However I would argue he has had no opportunity to do so and continues to do the best he can with the rules his owner has set. I imagine the off season will be exciting again with lots of wheeling.

Joshua
Joshua 5pts

Good aticle, but one thing wasn't mentioned that I thought played a big part in our collapse and that is McHale for some reason fell in love with playing a small lineup late in games and not going with Dalembert or Camby in the 4th qtr. to protect thr rim and get boards. We lost the New Orleans game because we got murdered on the offensive boards as McHale continued to go with Patterson at the five. We also just lost to the Heat in the same fashion. I have had a big prlbem with McHale's 4th qtr. lineups recently. The small lineup never worked late in games, and don't tel me that he kept Camby and Sammy D out of the 4th qtr. for offensive reasons cuz Camby has been doing a god job of keeping our offense flowing early in games because he's a good passer at the high post and top of the key and can hit that jumper as well. Camby could;ve also prevented our offense from going cold turkey in the 4th qtr. At least Sammy D wouldn't have let us get outrebounded so badly either. I did hear that Camby had a sore back late in the NOLA game, but Sammy D wasnt on the injury report at all for the NOLA game an didn't play a minute. That's inexcusable on mcHale's part considering we're playing for our playoff lives. I just don't understand why McHale continued to play a small lineup in the 4th qtr. of many of these games when it simply never worked. Any thoughts on this analysis from a very frustrated diehart Rockets fan???

Stephen
Stephen 5pts

One of the great things about the Play-Offs is they expose a team's weaknesses.

This stretch to get in brutally exposed the Rocket's weaknesses.

 

1)Other than Scola the team has zero inside game. Other teams can double Scola at will and the other Rocket bigs don't make them pay. When Scola goes to the bench the offense is entirely perimeter oriented and that leads to...

2)They don't have a wing scorer-someone who can get a shot at any time,and who will take it. None of the Rocket wings will take it hard to the rim,thus they draw no fouls. They're taking little runners,flips,etc. W/defenses not having to worry about an inside game or penetration they can crowd Rocket wings.

3) The C position. Camby beating out Dalembert is horrifying. Dalembert has decomposed before or eyes and Camby is extremely fragile. We may b**** about Scola at the C,but what other option does McHale have?

4) Dragic is a good PG,but a great one,no. He is not capable of taking over games late and putting the team on his back.

5)Nagging injuries. Lee seems to have lost quite a bit of his lift on his jumpers since his injury against the Lakers and his 3pt consistency has especially taken a hit. McHale commented that they probably brought Lowry back too soon. That may refer to conditioning,or his groin injury hasn't fully healed. As to ruining chemistry,it didn't ruin chemistry his first two games back which the Rockets won.

gregwlsn
gregwlsn 5pts

Cosign on the return of Kyle Lowry wrecking the chemistry.  Kyle Lowry's their best player, and Dragic's fantastic week (Goran-sanity) probably accelerated his return, lest he end up traded to Golden State because GS will do anything.  The code is a starter never loses his spot due to injury, so Coach had to make that work during a playoff run.  That plus Camby's decline sealed it.

 

Is it time to evaluate Morey's tenure?  I say he gets another year of collecting dimes and nickels, hoping to get a quarter.  The Rockets are a upper-echelon franchise, i suspect there's a rarely spoken reason free agents don't want to come here, and that may be the front office.   Getting traded is always a possibility in the NBA, but Morey's "anyone can go" rep appears to hang over the players more w/the Rockets' organization.  I don't know, just a hunch.

 

Amnesty's the easy option for Kevin Martin but I'd like to see us get something for him.  The relationship is wrecked; he can put some points on the board, just not here.

rahathuq
rahathuq moderator 5pts

 @gregwlsn i doubt his trade value is that low that you'd need to amnesty him.  worst case, i think you can work some sort of three-way to send him to chicago where he'd fit perfectly.

Frogs07
Frogs07 5pts

I'm curious what Morey thinks Budinger's cieling is exactly. He is a sharp shooter, but we haven't seen much progress in the evolution of his offensive production for the Rockets.

 

I can not see him being able to contribute much more than 9-10 points in this league. Does the front office and coaching staff expect him to hit the15-18 points per game average? While he has improved defensively, I don't see him committing strongly enough to that end of the floor to warrant additional playing time to ultimately get the extra points we need to win. Particularly on a McHale coached squad... 

RedNationReport
RedNationReport 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

Great artical. It'll give you gray hairs to try and explain this anomoly. Could the return of Kyle Lowry be the reason for the collapse? Did it mess up a certain chemistry or change a rotation that was working very nicely? Who the hell knows. All we do know is that when it came down to crunch-time, when the Rockets earned the right to control their playoff destiny, they crumbled and caved. The team was just not as good as a lot of ppl thought. Morey gave it a shot with this group and failed. I wouldn't be surprised if there was a complete overhaul of the roster. Question is, would a package of 1st rd pks and assets be enough for a team to take on Martin's contract?

mikepina
mikepina 5pts

 @RedNationReport Thanks and great question about Martin. I don't know what it'd take, but I just can't imagine him in a Rockets uniform next season. 

Trackbacks

  1. […] Pina of Red 94, the Houston Rockets ESPN TrueHoop Affiliate blog, wrote an interesting piece on the Rockets’ recent collapse, here’s an excerpt: “With no consistent presence on the interior apart from Luis Scola (who in […]

Follow Red94 for all new post updates and occasional rants.

×